Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap
    • Evening all looking for bit of advice again , currently doing my own debt management , but think may have burgered up on 1 of the creditors (creation loan) had got sold to Intrum around nov 23 and havent paid anything to it since then , it never went to default ( I thought it did  , now checking credit file , intrum is there and says 1 missed payment and doesnt say account defaulted can i let that go and intrum will default it? hope that makes sense what i have said
    • Hi. You've left the PCN number on the 22nd March letter and your name on the one below that. It's best to cover those up please. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can I Re-mortgage with Welcome Finance Charge on Property???


harvey2103
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have contacted the Land Registry and there is a charge on my property so the loan is secured.

 

I was having another look through last night and still there is nothing about cancellation or a notice of cancellation.

 

Along with this they have valued you the house at completely the wrong value, they have added a good £25,000 onto the value (which is quite a lot for where i live), they havent checked with the mortgage company about the value/equity etc otherwise they would have known there was no equity.

 

Another thing that suprised me is their credit check, I now have details of all the loans my parents and sisters have taken out over the years, along with my ex partners parents and brothers details and monthly payments! It amazes me that they would need to check all this!

 

Also i found the "missing records" its just one piece of paper with a long list of unanswered phone calls over the two years. They have noted the times I have written to them about a payment plan but no action has been taken on it.

 

i'll keep reading!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back again guys!

 

Can anyone tell me how to calcutate the total charge/interest due on your loan please? Ive tried many ways myself but cant seem to come up with the figures they have.

 

My loan was 13,000 plus 235 acceptance fee and APR is 25.90, this is over ten years. Im getting myself in a muddle trying to work it out!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back again guys!

 

Can anyone tell me how to calcutate the total charge/interest due on your loan please? Ive tried many ways myself but cant seem to come up with the figures they have.

 

My loan was 13,000 plus 235 acceptance fee and APR is 25.90, this is over ten years. Im getting myself in a muddle trying to work it out!

 

Thanks

 

There isn't a quick and easy explanation, but a financial calculator helps.

 

In order to arrive at the APR 25.90% APR These are the numbers I used:

 

Total Financed - 13,235.00

Total Charge for Credit - 20,965.00

Total Amount Payable - 34,200.00

Monthly Rate - 1.94%

120 payments of 285.00

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Im still confused as when i look at it again, there is two interest rates. Its laid out as follows:

 

Total amount of credit - 13,000

Monthly payments - 279.72

No of months - 120

APR (Variable) - 25.90

 

Total charge for credit - 20,566.03

acceptance fee - 235

Interest Charge - 20,331.03

Rate of interest per annum - 25.20

 

Whats with the two interest charges? Nothing these guys do seems to make sense to me!!!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Im still confused as when i look at it again, there is two interest rates. Its laid out as follows:

 

Total amount of credit - 13,000

Monthly payments - 279.72

No of months - 120

APR (Variable) - 25.90

 

Total charge for credit - 20,566.03

acceptance fee - 235

Interest Charge - 20,331.03

Rate of interest per annum - 25.20

 

Whats with the two interest charges? Nothing these guys do seems to make sense to me!!!

 

Thanks

 

One rate is called the nominal rate (25.20) which is the monthly nominal/flat rate. If your annual is showing at 25.20, then your monthly should be 2.1%

 

The other rate (25.90) is the APR and this reflects the compounded interest including all fees etc.

 

The APR is usually used by the consumer to compare loan offers. The APR is kind of like a price tag. The actual interest applied each month is based on the nominal monthly rate, which in your case should be 2.1% or 25.20 per annum.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers! So based on the 25.2% they're pretty much spot on, that must be a first!

 

Its starting to look like they maybe havent made many mistakes on this loan, other than no notice of cancellation/cooing off period and the fact they've valued the property incorrectly. (although i find it hard to believe they could get it so right!!)

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the Welcome agreements I have seen do calculate the interest correctly. The lack of advance copy and no notice of cancellation will benefit far more than anything else they may have messed up.

 

So is there no PPI or other insurance? No Mortgage indemnity fee?

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok it doesnt feel so bad that they got it right then!

 

Im not sure i understand the rules for the cancellation notice etc,

ive been trying to read the appropriate sections of the act today at work,

but my heads starting to feel like a burst balloon with it all.

 

 

To me, it seems they have to issue with a cancellation notice

BUT if they dont, there should be a cooling off period of 14 days from signing of the agreement??

 

 

I keep reading different things on this, some say seven days, some say fourteen

and it seems to depend on whether their was face to face business or whether it was done by post.

 

As for charges, you may find this hard to believe...but no PPI, MID, zilch!!!

All ive had in charges since 2005 are the acceptance fee along with £60 worth of charges.

 

 

Which seems strange cause ive had letters, house visits etc,

but then again their making their money on the fact theyve added £300 a month interest onto the balance

when i started missing payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, that makes sense now. as it was secured I had no cancellation rights.

 

I know I didnt receive an advanced copy as I kept everything on file myself and there is no no record/copy of it in the SAR but I cant see how I would even prove this, would they not just say it was sent ie my word agains theirs???

Link to post
Share on other sites

dbabylon has summed things up pretty good for you.

 

Proof of evidence (in a legal sense) is often times nothing more than your statement of how things transpired. As dbabylon, the judgment would be based on the balance of probabilities. In other words, given all the evidence available, is it more probable that you were given an advance notice, or not. I,f for arguments sake, it was conceded that some sort of advance copy was given, then was the time required for the notice prior to signing allowed? The lender must not contact you at all during the consideration period.

 

The thing is, in order for any of this to be of use to you, you will need to go through the court. At the moment, many would argue that its not wise to bring an action as a claimant as the courts are more and more ruling in favour of the lenders. It may well be that if you do go via court, you may not win without appealing. The lower courts rule against you, you know you are right and need to appeal as this is where the law will be properly applied. The higher courts will not set a precedent that in essence reverse legislation. Saying that to say, you may be in for a a bit of a fight.

 

If you have the time, resources and patience, I'd say get good counsel and go for it, otherwise, it may be worth thinking about. Perhaps you can try to negotiate a settlement that you are happy with, without the need to go to court. In my experience though, Welcome are not to keen to negotiate, even when they know they are in the wrong.

 

I too did not have an advance copy or cancellation notice. Despite all of the numerous things wrong with my loan, my barrister is of the opinion that the lack of the advance copy is fatal to Welcome and their defense of my claim. This is grounds for an improperly executed and unenforceable agreement. Granted each situation and facts of each case are different, and you need to give them some thought. Have you thought of getting a few opinions from some consumer credit lawyers?

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, was without a computer there for a few days.

 

I really dont think I would have the time and money to fight this all the way through the courts, Im currently working two jobs at maximum hours to pay off my debt!! My ex left me in this mess so im determined to get it all paid off myself.

 

I guess I was just looking for something to bring the balance down a bit, I mean for a 13,000 loan, Ive paid £5,000 approx yet its currently sitting at £16,000 - it just seems ridiculous that they can get away with that!!!

 

Why are welcome so against settlements when they are apprently in financial difficulty, you would think they would take what they can from people????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

Does anyone know if you can still make payments to WF via the automated payment service. I had a link to it previously but its now not available.

 

I dont want to set up a direct debit with them and refuse to speak to them on the phone. I have written to them several times requesting there bank details so i can make payments via online banking but im getting no response (as usual!!)

 

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi all,

 

I am looking for some advice on whether I can re-mortgage my property when I have a second charge on the property.

 

The short story is, I stupidly took out a Welcome Finance Loan about 10 years ago now and it was secured on my flat. After separating from my partner, I ended up not being able to afford the monthly payments, the loan has been passed onto various debt agencies but it now with Lowell, I pay an agreed sum each month and have been doing so for around 4/5 years now.

 

I am currently trying to remortgage my flat as myself and my partner had a baby, we cant afford to move to a bigger property but are hoping to convert the loft into a second bedroom. The remortgage would just allow us to do the conversion but there wouldn't be enough to pay off the WF loan. As I will be adding value to the property, my intension would be to sell the property a few years down the line and pay the WF loan off at that time.

 

I have been accepted for a new mortgage by Halifax, they are aware of the second charge on the property and said they would write to WF and request that the charge be postponed, which sounds quite straight forward to me but I'm fully aware nothing with WF is straight forward!!

 

What are the chances of WF postponing the charge when the debt has been sold on? and what are the chances of Halifax approving the mortgage, if the second charge is now with a debt recovery agent?

 

I am thinking that I shouldn't be getting my hopes up and its unlikely Halifax will approve the re-mortgage, but any advice would be appreciated, I might save myself some fees if I knew in advance what the likely outcome is?

 

Any advice would be fantastic.

 

Thanks,

 

 

HVY

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much did you take out?

How much to go?how much are their insurance s and the mif

Bet they owe you after everything is reclaimed

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Numerous threads merged

Now gonna go read the history

 

Brb

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx,

 

I have no idea how I managed to merge those threads but it gives you an idea of the history and that I have already requested sar.

 

I took out 13k initially and my current balance is just over 13k now. I only pay 50 a month to the dca and have done for years. I never get any phone calls or bother from wf or whichever dca is handling it at the time.

 

If wf have sold the debt on, Should they have removed the charge or does it not work like this?

 

I got the loan directly from wf as they had an office local to me.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did it:lol:

 

I never got around to looking

been a bit busy.

I review things today if I can

safe to say you've been royally cash cowed I bet

hence the balance today.

 

theeres no compulsion to remove a charge upon sale

though i'm surprised it has not been removed

as many were years ago under some kind of deal with I think the FCA etc.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't look like many holes to me.

 

 

any chance you can scan up all the statements and the org agreement you have please?

pop EVERY PAGE to JPG

redact them

and put each page into a multipage word doc

and file save as .pdf

 

 

if not email them to me

if I give you an email

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol ok, I was confused!

 

Yeah Ive been reading about the charges being removed on other people's wf loan but can't seem to find out much about it. That would solve all my problems as Halifax wouldn't have an issue if the charge was removed.

 

I can scan and email them to you, won't be until Tuesday when I'm back at work as I've no scanner at home. There's a lot of info too, they had a fair file on me!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...