Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Audi dealership mis led me about availability of a car. Mis sold new car a8


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3007 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

Thank you for looking at this post.

 

NOTE: only 121 audi a8 edition 21 are made for the UK. AvailbLe to order from July 2015. I am a chauffeur and wanted the a8 edition 21 because of my own personal liking to this model

 

In the last week of August 2015 I decided that I want to purchase a new A8 LWB Edition 21. I was dealing with wimbledon audi. I have enquired about the a8 edition 21.

 

I was told that the a8 edition 21 LWB was not available to order and also they could not configure the car on the audi website which meant audi does not make it in LWB verson (a a8 edition 21 SWB was available on the website). I have said serveral times if the a8 edition 21 model was available to order. I was told no and the salesman have confirmed it with a manager.

 

So I decided on a8 LWB which was in stock. Which I decided to buy because based on the salesman telling me the edition 21 LWB was not available and audi did not make it.

 

5 months down the line I visited the west london audi and couldn't believe my eyes and saw an a8 LWB edition 21. I enquired to the sales team and asked when the edition 21 LWB was available to order and they confirmed it was July 2015.

 

My question is that based on the salesman at Wimbledon audi telling me that the edition 21 is not available in the LWB and audi did not make it in the LWB version which made me to buy the normal a8 lwb .Have I been missold the vehicle I have purchased?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't be called – mis-selling. It would be called misrepresentation.

 

A contractual misrepresentation is an untrue statement which causes you to enter into a contract.

 

If you have evidence that these incorrect statements were made to you then you may be able to consider some kind of action.

 

I think we would have to discuss what your actual losses were. You probably need to explain why it was important to you to have the addition 21 rather than the model which you bought

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Thank you for looking at this post.

 

NOTE: only 121 audi a8 edition 21 are made for the UK. AvailbLe to order from July 2015. I am a chauffeur and wanted the a8 edition 21 because of my own personal liking to this model

 

In the last week of August 2015 I decided that I want to purchase a new A8 LWB Edition 21. I was dealing with wimbledon audi. I have enquired about the a8 edition 21.

 

I was told that the a8 edition 21 LWB was not available to order and also they could not configure the car on the audi website which meant audi does not make it in LWB verson (a a8 edition 21 SWB was available on the website). I have said serveral times if the a8 edition 21 model was available to order. I was told no and the salesman have confirmed it with a manager.

 

So I decided on a8 LWB which was in stock. Which I decided to buy because based on the salesman telling me the edition 21 LWB was not available and audi did not make it.

 

5 months down the line I visited the west london audi and couldn't believe my eyes and saw an a8 LWB edition 21. I enquired to the sales team and asked when the edition 21 LWB was available to order and they confirmed it was July 2015.

 

My question is that based on the salesman at Wimbledon audi telling me that the edition 21 is not available in the LWB and audi did not make it in the LWB version which made me to buy the normal a8 lwb .Have I been missold the vehicle I have purchased?

 

Potentially, but you have accepted the car you bought and used it for 5 months ..... making it unlikely that you can void the initial contract.

 

So, what are your actual losses?. You might have a case to reclaim your actual losses (factoring in that you may have paid less for the normal a8 lwb than for an equivalent edition 21 a8 LWB).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Potentially, but you have accepted the car you bought and used it for 5 months ..... making it unlikely that you can void the initial contract.

 

So, what are your actual losses?. You might have a case to reclaim your actual losses (factoring in that you may have paid less for the normal a8 lwb than for an equivalent edition 21 a8 LWB).

 

Thank you bank fodder and BAZZAS for you reply.

 

Yes know looking into the difference of mis sold and mis representation. I have bee involved in mis representation.

 

The contract was in use for the past 5 months by me still believing that the edition 21 LWB was not available. Only now it's been revealed that it was available to order at that time and if I have been given this option I would have chosen to buy the edition 21.

 

As I am already in the 5 months of the contract. If this goes to court the judge can award damages which in my case would be not even worth talking about. Or void the contract and put me in the position before I signed the contract. The judge can't award both but what's best for the claimant.

 

My basis on me being involved in mis representation sale are the following.

 

After confirming a8 edition 21 is not available.

 

I decided to buy a a8 sports Lwb

 

- was told interior was black

- on the day of viewing the iterator was light grey not black and audi offered to put a protection in the interior to protect from "all stains".

-my leather and carpet got stained from dye transfer. Dye is not covered by the protection. Was never told what's not protected.if I knew it doesn't cover against dye I would have never purchase it and I have clients with jeans every day.

 

-received an email of the specification of the exterior. Had sports bumper which the previous a8 sports didn't have. (I don't know what the a8 sports bumpers look like at that time).

-I found out this week after enquiring to audi what the sports bumpers are and have been told that they are the same ones as the edition 21. When I seen the car for the first time I taught the bumpers were the sports as I have never seen it before. So I went with it. Now realising that the bumpers I have aren't the sport bumpers just the plain a8 bumpers.

 

-I was told that the a8 edition 21 lwb was not available from audi only the short wheel base was based on that the sales didn't have the option to configure the car in audi configuration site. I made him confirm this many times and he confirmed it after speaking to the manager. There were 2 prices which I was told the following the edition 21 SWB £73k and the other price of £76k was the editor 21 v8 swb

- other audi dealerships confirmed that the edition 21 a8 lwb was available to order from July 2015. And stated in the audi news.

 

I have found 2 audi dealerships who still have the a8 edition 21 lwb in stock. I still want the a8 edition 21 as it is still available.

 

What do you think chaps

 

-

 

 

 

-

Edited by jason9874
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you bank fodder and BAZZAS for you reply.

 

Yes know looking into the difference of mis sold and mis representation. I have bee involved in mis representation.

 

The contract was in use for the past 5 months by me still believing that the edition 21 LWB was not available. Only now it's been revealed that it was available to order at that time and if I have been given this option I would have chosen to buy the edition 21.

 

As I am already in the 5 months of the contract. If this goes to court the judge can award damages which in my case would be not even worth talking about. Or void the contract and put me in the position before I signed the contract. The judge can't award both but what's best for the claimant.

 

My basis on me being involved in mis representation sale are the following.

 

After confirming a8 edition 21 is not available.

 

I decided to buy a a8 sports Lwb

 

- was told interior was black

- on the day of viewing the iterator was light grey not black and audi offered to put a protection in the interior to protect from "all stains".

-my leather and carpet got stained from dye transfer. Dye is not covered by the protection. Was never told what's not protected.if I knew it doesn't cover against dye I would have never purchase it and I have clients with jeans every day.

 

-received an email of the specification of the exterior. Had sports bumper which the previous a8 sports didn't have. (I don't know what the a8 sports bumpers look like at that time).

-I found out this week after enquiring to audi what the sports bumpers are and have been told that they are the same ones as the edition 21. When I seen the car for the first time I taught the bumpers were the sports as I have never seen it before. So I went with it. Now realising that the bumpers I have aren't the sport bumpers just the plain a8 bumpers.

 

-I was told that the a8 edition 21 lwb was not available from audi only the short wheel base was based on that the sales didn't have the option to configure the car in audi configuration site. I made him confirm this many times and he confirmed it after speaking to the manager. There were 2 prices which I was told the following the edition 21 SWB £73k and the other price of £76k was the editor 21 v8 swb

- other audi dealerships confirmed that the edition 21 a8 lwb was available to order from July 2015. And stated in the audi news.

 

I have found 2 audi dealerships who still have the a8 edition 21 lwb in stock. I still want the a8 edition 21 as it is still available.

 

What do you think chaps

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Sadly, I still have to ask the same question as before: what are your losses?

 

I think you may be able to claim for your losses. I doubt you will have the contract voided from the start (rescission), given the 5 months use of the car you have had, (and, that as a result, you can't give that car back in brand new condition due to the 5 months use).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...