Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot/Wescots chasing Natwest OD debt - already paying by CCJ/CO to shoes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3083 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

 

my wife has been receiving letters from Wescots, chasing an old Natwest Overdraft.

 

 

It was from a joint account that was closed by Natwest in 2007.

 

 

While we were a bit daft, we had been paying it off through a company called Apex.

After finding this group back in 2014, and realising we were being 'cash cowed', we stopped payments.

Although this was a joint account we were both chased for the full amount of the overdraft.

 

 

The whole amount of the overdraft was combined with a personal loan I had, and this has been dealt with in the county court.

I have a charge on my property, and am making payment through Shoesmiths.

 

 

My question is, has this overdraft debt been dealt with ?.

If not, how do I proceed with Wescot, who seem to have the same address as Cabot.

And I've heard Wescots are not beyond contacting your neighbours,to get information about you.

 

Regards... Dave G

Edited by bubblenskweak
Wrong Company namr
Link to post
Share on other sites

who merged the od with the loan?

 

 

did you not defend the claim at all?

 

 

if you've proof you are already paying it

then send that to wetcloths or simply ignore them.

 

 

bit more of the story please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx, It was Natwest who combined the debts.

I didn't defend at all, as I was unaware of this group then, and didn't think there was any other option.

I am unsure what proof would be, I have never had any statements from Shoesmiths. All I get from them, is constant letters asking me to fill in income/expediture forms. Obviously trying to get more money out of me, I ignore these, and they point out they could take further legal action.

I'll see if I can find the judgement letter, that could possibly be proof.

Regards...Dave G

Link to post
Share on other sites

You pay who is listed on the CCJ Judgement and you pay the instalment amount that is also listed on your judgement.

 

Unless you receive paperwork from the Courts notifying you of a variation in the payee, then continue to pay as you have always done.

 

Write a letter to Cabot informing that unless you receive a payee variation order from the Court then you will continue paying Shoesmiths.

 

Stigman

  • Haha 1

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You pay who is listed on the CCJ Judgement and you pay the instalment amount that is also listed on your judgement.

 

Unless you receive paperwork from the Courts notifying you of a variation in the payee, then continue to pay as you have always done.

 

Write a letter to Cabot informing that unless you receive a payee variation order from the Court then you will continue paying Shoesmiths.

 

Stigman

 

:thumb:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...