Hfo CCJ/CO now sold to LInk

[vjohn82]

Isn't there some case law for taking action just prior to the SB date without all of the required paperwork for filing the claim? This case looks like speculative action. A Notice to Admit Facts is going to be useful here, especially regarding the DN issue. If we get HFO to actually admit to certain facts which can be proven not to tally with legislation then they'll discontinue I suspect as they have done with others.

 

They do not like admitting to elements of their claim being flawed ;-)

[broken arrow]

Isn't there some case law for taking action just prior to the SB date without all of the required paperwork for filing the claim? This case looks like speculative action. A Notice to Admit Facts is going to be useful here, especially regarding the DN issue. If we get HFO to actually admit to certain facts which can be proven not to tally with legislation then they'll discontinue I suspect as they have done with others.

 

They do not like admitting to elements of their claim being flawed ;-)

 

The hearing is next week VJ, so not much time.

[DonkeyB]

Elmes v Hygrade for a start..

 

It’s here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?281886-Just-before-going-statute-barred-court-claims&p=3178316&viewfull=1

[dadofholly]

Is it possible to add that to his WS?

[coledog]

This one is getting better and better

[DonkeyB]

BA, will be sending you some thoughts. Remember, you only need to sow enough doubt to make the summary judgment go away, ie. prove there is a case to answer. No point revealing a full defence at this stage.

[coledog]

Have also send some thoughts

 

Have a look at tony_c's thread, amasing

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?281377-Hfo-capital-limited

[DonkeyB]

Tony got his set aside on the back of a dodgy NoA like you have!

[riolto10]

Tony got his set aside on the back of a dodgy NoA like you have!

thanks for all your comments and advice I have read all of them and am about to print of W/S I will need you all in the comming week many thanks again

[coledog]

Just ask

[riolto10]

Just ask

 

Will do and I will keep you informed of any updates

[riolto10]

Witness statement submitted to court will check out all posts and e-mails and e-mail you with questions thanks

[dadofholly]

no problems - dont forget to keep us updated.

[broken arrow]

They might try a supplementary WS, to cover their story and try and couner what you have put in yours.

 

I will send you some more stuff over the next few days, with an explanation of what they are.

 

If they had any sense they would discontinue.

[riolto10]

They might try a supplementary WS, to cover their story and try and couner what you have put in yours.

 

I will send you some more stuff over the next few days, with an explanation of what they are.

 

If they had any sense they would discontinue.

 

they can try but with little time left for me to receive and answer then I too hope they discontinue, thanks broken arrow look forward to your help

[DonkeyB]

But a supplementary WS would imply that their first WS was actually a fib, and the statement of truth would rather mess it up for them.

[broken arrow]

But a supplementary WS would imply that their first WS was actually a fib, and the statement of truth would rather mess it up for them.

 

They have done this a couple of times before donkey, they don,t like it when you counter all their arguments on their WS, so they move the goalposts, if you get my drift........

[riolto10]

They have done this a couple of times before donkey, they don,t like it when you counter all their arguments on their WS, so they move the goalposts, if you get my drift........

their application for this hearing next week from the court states I have to have my witness statement in seven days before the hearing so it must be the same for them they have not got mine yet posted it to them today recorded delivery so they should get it tomorrow, if they read it and take note of all the untruths in their witness statement there is only one thing they can do and thats discontinue.

[broken arrow]

their application for this hearing next week from the court states I

Have we missed a bit?

[riolto10]

Have we missed a bit?

 

pushed wrong button edited now sorry for that your to quick for me

[riolto10]

As promised a update in court tomorrow broken arrow was right they have sent me a further witness statement I will up load now will have tro type out 3 on first page of statement unable to read it properly

[DonkeyB]

In which case we’ll get you another WS to fax tonight! Either that or you ask the court to disbar their late WS, as it is out of time.

[riolto10]

http://i1142.photobucket.com/albums/n604/riolto/scan0034.jpg

 

3..furthermore, the notice of assignment sent to the defendant informs him that all correspondence and payments must be sent to the claimants agent. HFO services .'

Barclaycard inadvertently wrote Roxburhe as the owners of the defendants account when in fact HFO services are the party the defendant is to contact regarding queries and payments on his assigned account

Edited February 16, 2011 by riolto10

[DonkeyB]

I bet they have included a certain agreement of 1 January 2010... but this won’t get them over the dodgy NoA, I’m afraid.

[riolto10]

page 2

http://i1142.photobucket.com/albums/n604/riolto/scan0035.jpg