Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

SLL Capital - Enforecment Department [DCA] - old stayed claim?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3161 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Safeloans like to do court, they are just across the road from Croydon Court so there are minimal charges for them for using court. The charges and interest need looking at.

 

I would also add that the description of the account is inaccurate - it is NOT a drawdown, it is a PAYDAY LOAN repayable 30 days after the money has reached the account, and, as such, already carries a high rate of interest. That should be your first rebuttal of their claim against you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would take a read of the following thread Mat...and adapt/edit/add to the defence used in this thread.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?416737-Help-please-court-claim-1st-Stop-PayDay-***Claim-Discontinued***/page2

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

how about this?

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.THE CLAIMANT PROVIDED THE DEFENDANT AN AGREED CREDIT LIMIT UNDER A RUNNING ACCOUNT AGREEMENT DATED 04 JANUARY 2012 (SHORT TERM LENDING), TO THE SUM OF 300.00.

 

2.THE ACCOUNT HAS NO FIXED DURATION, ENABLING APPROVED SUMS TO BE DRAWN DOWN UP TO THE CREDIT LIMIT.

EACH DRAWDOWN AMOUNT PLUS INTEREST WILL BE REPAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM DRAW DOWN DATE.

 

3.THE REPAYMENT DATE WAS 07/02/2012. THE DEFENDANT HAS NOT GIVEN ANY NOTICE TO PAY THE CLAIMANT EARLY OR IN PART AND THE ACCOUNT IS STILL OUTSTANDING TO THE SUM OF £465.56

 

4.THE CLAIMANT IS ALSO ENTITLED TO INTEREST AT THE RATE STATED IN THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT. THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO REPAY THE ACCOUNT.

 

THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS:

1. THE AMOUNT £175.00 - LOAN AMOUNT.

2. LOAN CHARGES / INTEREST £290.56.

3. THE CLAIMANT TOTAL CLAIM IS £465.56.

4. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS STATUTORY INTEREST AT 8% UP UNTIL THE DATE OF JUDGMENT OR SETTLEMENT, UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE county courticon ACT 1984.

DATE: 05 JULY 2012.

 

 

1. It is accepted that I did approach the Claimant with a view to borrowing a short term loan. It was my understanding that this amount was due to be repaid 30 days later, including 30 days interest.

 

2. It is accepted that repayment was to be made 30 days later, unfortunately due to a change in my financial circumstances beyond my control this was not possible.

 

3. It is denied that I have failed to meet the repayment terms and conditions. It is denied that the claimant has made many attempts to resolve this, I have written to the claimant many times regarding this matter, offering and asking for a repayment plan, all letters and emails have been ignored.

 

4. It is denied that I am in debt to the value claimed and the claimant is put to strict proof to:-

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for.

© show how the breach occurred and how they attempted any resolution.

 

5. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay lets add your particulars and see if it corresponds to the claimants pleadings.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks ok to me.......PDL claims never get past the defence stage and usually leave it stayed or discontinue so its difficult to advise on how they may challenge your defence.

 

I suppose the first question that may be asked .....If the proceed

 

" Was you aware and did you agree that the total loan would equate to £300? "

 

And what the court will think when they see the following particulars....

 

1. THE AMOUNT £175.00 - LOAN AMOUNT.

2. LOAN CHARGES / INTEREST £290.56.

3. THE CLAIMANT TOTAL CLAIM IS £465.56.

 

:!:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And are they in default of a CCA request?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't sent one, I'm thinking if they look into the file, they may see that they don't have a CCJ like they think they do and then apply for default judgement, while I'm waiting for the CCA to come back.

 

Having sadi that they have ignored every email I have sent them in the past

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mmm that's a shame...it was have added weight and safeguarded....never mind just submit the above and see what response you get.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence submitted by email. Should I post it to the court?

 

Yes

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The normal procedure within the process...acknowledge claim......14 days submit defence......claimant has 28 days to decide if they wish to to proceed to allocation...or the claim is stayed.

 

Yours has been stayed since they submitted the claim ...not requested default judgment ...not done anything.

 

Now that you have submitted a defence ...as the claimant does not appear interested....the court will not prompt them and leave it stayed.(6 month rule)

 

So in effect nothing in reality as changed except...because you have submitted a defence...they can not proceed to judgment.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

great, so now I could make them aware they don't have a CCJ and get them to start giving me details about the debt.

 

Why ? you know they dont have a judgment......dont prod the bear...unless its necessary.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It seems odd to send a WS when you haven't even had any notice from the court about the claim proceeding, allocation questionnaire, directions, etc.

 

Any chance you could scan them and post them up - minus any identifiable data?

 

It sounds like it's a stab in the dark and hoping it scares you into paying them something rather than proceed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Matt. I've had a skim over it but will look again later to see what anomalies I can spot. Andyorch will be your friend on this and he should be able to give you a quite quick assessment of the state of play.

 

Assuming this proceeds, my first point of focus would be to make them show how the claimed balance was arrived at. There's a few iffy looking charges within the terms and then interest on top. Also, was a default notice ever given to you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do these muppets even have a clue about court procedure.

 

 

Is the unsealed "Reference only" claim form identical to the original.

 

 

If the claim was issued 09/07/12 and they never bothered to obtain judgment in default,

I don't think any Judge is going to be impressed by their correspondence dated 07/08/12

where they are clearly trying to mislead you into thinking you already have a CCJ

and the [naughty word] about enforcement action and AoE order will be requested at your local court on 21/08/12 if it's not paid!

 

 

The claim has been stayed since Jan 13 because of their stupidity of failing to obtain default judgment

- which they are now unable to since you got in first with a defence.

 

 

The [naughty word] about not obtaing judgment sooner because they wanted to be lenient with you just shows what clueless muppets they are.

 

 

WTF is their witness statement all about anyway.

If they think your claim is vexatious and want the judge to throw out your defence

they should go through the proper channel and submit an app for summary judgement.

 

 

I don't think I would be losing too much sleep over these numpties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's weird

 

 

it cant all be fake?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...