Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
    • Greetings, I'm writing to seek assistance with an ongoing issue I'm having with Manchester Council.  I parked my car in a residential area behind Wilmslow Road to go purchase some food, not realizing it was a no-parking zone. I later received a letter stating I had failed to make the required payment, and the penalty had increased. I appealed the fine, explaining that I had parked there but never received the original Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), so I was unaware of the need to pay. However, the council's reply did not address my initial concern. Is there anything I can do in this situation? I admit to parking there, and I was willing to pay the original fine, but I don't think it's fair for them to demand a doubled amount when they failed to send me the initial PCN.  Any advice or guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your assistance.   MK Document.pdf
    • If you look at some of the other debt related threads will see that one of the first things which will be asked will be for you to list out your debts in a brief chronological order, including date of debt, amount, creditor, amount outstanding, defaulted – yes/no – date of default, date of last payment made, have you acknowledged the debt at all to the creditors. That lot at least. I expect that my colleague @dx100uk will be along but will meet to know at least that information
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Euro Car Parks - Illegal tickets??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4953 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 190
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Your charging a "FINE" oh dear its you committing a criminal act, by claiming it’s a FINE or a PENALTY

 

You have no right in LAW to Charge a FINE or Issue a Penalty

 

What you are issuing is "an Unenforceable Invoice" on the pretence they may have entered into a civil contract, and as you allow free parking there is no loss you can claim legally

 

Take legal advice, you may need it

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

You obviously do not understand the law. It is private land, the signs are clear and the court does enforce it. I could charge for parking in the first place but allow free parking as a consideration to many nice people who appreciate the consideration, however there will always be a [EDIT] who spoils it for everone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Have you ever thought that the car park owners have to pay for the maintenence of these car parks and provide them for their customers. Car parking is at a premium these days and people abuse them and then try to [problem] to get out of paying. I own six spaces outside my shop, people use them all the time to go off for several hours and not use my business, why should I pay for someone to have a free ride. Be fair we all have to make a living, how would you feel if I came and parked on your driveway and went off shopping for a couple of hours. Same thing.

 

You dont get it do you

 

These people are running a [problem]

 

You dont work for Euro car parks do you lol:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a [EDIT]. Just object to shelling out cash for a situation that is not my fault. And bvy the way, people regularly park over my drive and obstruct it. I could try slapping a 50 quid fine on them but I suspect that they would just laugh at me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

crawl back under your stone Perky

 

and just what Court would enforce parking on private Land and what Law of the Land would apply

 

your correct the dont understand the law of planet perky , because its all in your head and does not apply to the Planet earth

 

time for good byes, 10 9 8 7 6 .....................

 

has he gone yet :D

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you own the land they are parked on then put up the correct signage and you can. If they are on the highway and your driveway is legal then call the police and get them moved. It is an offence for them to obstruct it. Euro car parks are not [problematic] they are doing a service for the poor people like me struggling to make an honest living despite the [problematic]

Link to post
Share on other sites

crawl back under your stone Perky

 

and just what Court would enforce parking on private Land and what Law of the Land would apply

 

your correct the dont understand the law of planet perky , because its all in your head and does not apply to the Planet earth

 

time for good byes, 10 9 8 7 6 .....................

 

has he gone yet :D

I cant argue with you if you talk rubbish, make it a reasonable educated discussion

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooo its a euro Fan!!!

ECP are definate [problematic] and a bunch of idiots

 

I phoned them up, they claimed on the phone to take everyone who doesnt pay to court

 

They dont.!

 

Now where can i find a free car parking space....

Link to post
Share on other sites

what, ?? now just who is talking rubbish

 

list your 3 answers as follows

 

1) what law of the land allows you or your agent to fine someone on private land

 

2) what law of the land would the court use in your favour

 

3) perky why are you such a stupid twit you will never win on here

 

4) list the cases where the [problematic] have won

 

answer the 3 above , pen and paper are not allowed , answers must be in a post on this thread

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that you are trying to make an honest living Fairplayforall and I don't mean to offend. I think that the point of this thread is that the large parking companies do not give a flying f*** about anything except making a fast buck. People expect to be treated with decency and (just perhaps) a little flexibility and understanding. How else are people to react when confronted with some of the situations on this (and other) threads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are all very silly people who just resort to stupid talk to try to justify your behaviour. Why can you not have a reasonable sensible discussion based on right and wrong and admit that you are not interested in anyone but yourselves, be fair to others think about someone else and do unto others as you would have them do to you.

I dont have to worry about which laws that is why I employ Euro car parks to monitor my car parking for me. They deal with all that side and the courts for me. As I have said already i give free parking and allow plenty of time for my customers. It is only the inconsiderate ones which blatently break the rules that pay the penalty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that you are trying to make an honest living Fairplayforall and I don't mean to offend. I think that the point of this thread is that the large parking companies do not give a flying f*** about anything except making a fast buck. People expect to be treated with decency and (just perhaps) a little flexibility and understanding. How else are people to react when confronted with some of the situations on this (and other) threads.

you only have to read the majority of these threads to see that most of them have blatenly broken the rules and then are looking for your help to get out of it. Even the big boys have problems with parking, most of them are in busy areas and people just want to park for free, some go away on the train for a week and park in the supermarkets. Be Fair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the bad news when someone takes your agents to court for [causing problems] you are also libel , go and read the LAW before spouting rubbish

 

you would be surprised just how many users on CAG are infact from a legal background, and are giving the correct advice

 

not the crap that these [problematic] /Parking companies tell their customers what the can and will do , then crap babble on about the road traffic act and imply it applies to private property, which it does not

 

take note PPC's do not do COURT anymore , they loose 99.999999999% cases that are defended

 

RULES what rules , they do not allow / or your agents to [problem] jo public, and RULES are not LAW

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that we will have to agree to disagree. I may be a silly person, but I have never blatantly tried for a free ride. I try and be fair and honest, but ECP do not!

nobody has ever been given a ticket in my car park that had not broken the rules. I do not [problem] and I make nothing from the tickets, the proceeds of the ticket go to the company to recover the court costs etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4953 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...