Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would suggest that you stop trying to rely on legal theory – as you understand it. Firstly, because we are dealing with practical/pragmatic situations and at a low value level where these arguments tend not to work. Secondly, because you clearly have misunderstood the assessment of quantum where there are breaches of obligations. The formula that you have cited above is the method of loss calculation in torts. In contract it is entirely different. The law of obligations generally attempts to remedy the breach. This means that in tort, damages seek to put you into the position you would have been in had the breach not occurred. In other words it returns you to your starting position – point zero. Contract damages attend put you into the position that you would have been had the breach not occurred but this is not your starting position, contract damages assume that the agreement in dispute had actually been carried out. This puts you into your final position. You sold an item for £XXX. Your expectation was that you your item would be correctly delivered and that you would be the beneficiary of £XXX. Your expectation loss is the amount that you sold the item for and that is all you are entitled to recover. If you want, you can try to sue for the larger sum – and we will help you. But if they ask for evidence of the value of the item as it was sold then I can almost guarantee that either you will be obliged to settle for the lesser sum – or else a judge will give you judgement but for the lesser sum. This will put you to the position that you would have been had there been no breach of contract. I understand from you now that when you dispatch the item you declared the retail cost to you and not your expected benefit of £XXX. To claim for the retail value in the circumstances would offend the rules relating to betterment. If you want to do it then we will help you – but don't be surprised if you take a tumble.  
    • I was caught speeding 3 times in the same week, on the same road. All times were 8-12mph higher than the limit. I was offered the course for the first offense and I now need to accept the other 2 offenses. I just want to be ready for what might come. Will I get the £100 fine and 3 points for each of them or do I face something more severe?  These are my only offenses in 8 years of driving.
    • I'll get my letter drafted this evening. Its an item I sold, which I'm also concerned about, as whilst I don't have my original purchase receipt (the best I have is my credit card statement showing a purchase from Car Audio Centre), I do unfortunately have the eBay listing where I sold it for much less. But as I said before this is now a question of compensation: true compensation would seek to put me back into the position I was in before the loss ie: that title would remain with me until my buyer has accepted this, and so compensation should be that which would be needed to replace the lost item. But in the world of instant electronic payment, it could be argued that as I had already been paid, the title to the goods had already transferred, and I was required to refund the buyer after the loss. And so, despite my declared value being the retail price - that which is needed to return me to my pre-sales position, the compensatory value should be the value I sold it for, which being a second-hand item from a private seller is lower. I still believe that I should be claiming for the item's full value, rather than how much I sold it for, as this is the same for insurance: we don't insure the value we paid, but rather the value of the item to put us back into the position we would be in if we ever needed to claim. Its for the loss adjuster to argue the toss
    • amusing that 'bad economic judgement on behalf of prior party ISN'T a major reason to wingers to move to deform yet immigration is, where record levels of such has been driven by the right wings terrible brexit and the later incompetent dog whistle 'proposals largely driven to whistle to the right wingnuts Just seems to confirm the are clueless numpties 'wetting their own shoes   Has farage bought a property in Clacton yet?   yet concern for the NHS is listed as a major issue even by those saying they are moving to deform  
    • Also, have you told us how much you paid for this vehicle? Are there any other expenses you have incurred – insurance, inspections et cetera? How far away from the dealership do you live?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Subcontractor taking photographs inside my home


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3359 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all!

 

 

Is it illegal for a subcontractor to take photos inside my house and send them to the landlord?

 

 

For a bit of background/detail - I am finally (after five years of waiting) getting a new kitchen in my Housing Association home. Today one of the subcontractors took a photograph of my cat litter tray and sent it to my landlord claiming that there was a smell of cat urine and faeces which made it intolerable for them to work in my property.

 

 

I have several issues with this - firstly I was totally unaware that this had happened, I was not asked permission by the subcontractor for him to take any photographs, nor was I aware that this had even happened until I received a telephone call from my landlord regarding same.

 

 

Secondly, the cat litter tray was in the downstairs cloakroom - separated from the kitchen in which they were supposed to be working by a utility room and a closed door. The smell from the tray is minimal and was not even detectable from the kitchen, which was the only place I was aware they were in. I did not give them permission to use the toilet, nor did they ask.

 

 

Thirdly, because I was totally unaware that any photographs were taken, I have no idea how many were taken, and of which parts of the house and/or my personal property.

 

 

Is what they did legal? and if not is there anything I can do about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chayton

 

Did the Sub Contractor at any time during them being in your property raise the issue and ask you to move the litter trays?

 

Did the Housing Association come out to inspect the issue raised (or was it a just a phone call only)?

 

During the Housing association phone call exactly what did the Housing Association state?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey :) No, I knew nothing of the issue until the phonecall from the landlord. The subbies left just after midday saying that they'd finished stripping the wallpaper and that the electrician would be around tomorrow. The housing association guy hasn't been around to inspect - just a telephone call. The housing association guy told me that I had until tomorrow afternoon to sort out the issue out or theyd call in contract cleaners to come and do the whole house and charge me for it. He stated that it had to be "clean enough for normal people to come round" - he told me that I was breaching the terms of my tenancy agreement if the house was not kept in a clean and tidy state, and that none of the subcontracters were willing to come into my house until the issue was sorted out. All this over a minor smell which wasn't even noticeable in the room they were supposed to be working in.

 

 

Obviously its not a huge problem to just change the cat litter - which I have now done, my main issue is whether it was legal for them to take unauthorised pictures of that and who knows what else without my permission or knowledge. I have no idea what else they did or where they went, and I will be ensuring that they are closely supervised every minute they're in my house from now on, since they quite evidently can't be trusted on their own.

 

 

 

 

EDIT: I didn't give them permission, nor did they ask, to use the toilet where the litter tray was located, and the door to that room and the utility room were both closed. I was in the house 90% of the time they were there so they had plenty of opportunity to ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id imagine that they were too embarrassed to confront you about it direct.

Secondly, if its a minor smell to you, its a major smell to them as you are used to it.

Pics, as long as they are for work purposes and to act as proof of something then I dont see that you have anything to complain about.

What would they have asked? Oh, excuse me but your house stinks of ammonia, can I take some pics as evidence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi chayton,

I apologise in advance if my post sounds rude, it isn't meant to be, but could be construed as rude.

 

A friend of mine has a cat, when I am in her house the smell for me is intolerable. My friend does not notice the smell so much since they are living with it daily. I try not to go into the house, but on the occasions I do, I am almost positive that I can smell cats on my clothes when I leave her house!

 

Maybe you could get some spray from your pet shop? Or a cheaper alternative would be to use lemons.

 

I think there is not much you can do about the contractors taking photos.

 

The best thing I believe you can do is to just get rid of the smell using whatever method you decide on and perhaps ask one of your friends whether they can smell anything. As you say, you can smell a minor smell, but what is minor to you would probably be major issue for someone not used to the smell.

 

I can understand your frustration in this but at the same time can also understand the subcontractors frustration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok lets take a step back here.

 

1. Did the Sub Contractor us his Personal Mobile or a Work Mobile Phone to take these Pictures? (if taken on a personal mobile tut tut tut)

 

2. The Sub Contractor irrespective should have politely asked the tenant to remove offending item to somewhere else then if they refused reported to Housing Association. (courtesy works both ways)

 

3. The Housing Association without investigating the matter have taken the Sub Contractors word and a photograph and threatened the tenant all without stepping foot in the property.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes no difference whether on personal phone or not. Why would it matter? Not forgetting he is a subcontractor, not a council employee so his work phone is probably his personal phone.

 

You cant politely tell someone their house smells(you can be nice about it, but they will always be offended). Its not something they are paid to do or trained to do. They would likely have faced disciplinary action should they have just said something without checking procedure with the office.

 

Why would the subby lie? The subby says the house smells strongly of ammonia and is not fit to work in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personal Work phone Vs Work phone.

Would data protection come into this at all?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think data protection would come into this, such as the contractor or landlord should not share that information to the public along with other information which would identify the person living in the house

 

taking a photo for the purpose of work is ok and i can't see the difference between using a personal or business phone to do this, on provision that it is used in relation to the business and not distributed outside the business along with other information which identifies the individual

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that using a work phone means the data stored on it is under the control of the data controller of the company, where as taken with a public phone does not.

 

Its not too important anyhow, im just theory crafting

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest OP is de-sensitised to cat odour anc Contrator is not. Photo of cat litter tray/location is iirelevet, cats spread litter around on their paws, and may not always use the litter tray. Cats can have weak bladder control as well as any human.

Whilst a courtesy to ask to use the loo, where else OP expect Contractor to relieve himself?

HA has duty of care to it's Contractor's for noxious smells, but HA phone call was 'premature'.

OP can expect a HA inspection visit soon. Does s/he have HA written permission to keep a cat? What does Lease say about pets?

After waiting 5 years, I would expect OP to be more interested in getting a new kitchen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I am probably de sensitised to the smell, however I have had a lot of people who don't own cats in the house, including since the contractors came - on the same day the contractors left, and before i changed the litter tray, I asked about an odour and none of them could smell it unless they were in the cloakroom where the tray is, where the subbies should not have been.

 

 

I do have permission to have cats.

 

 

I have no idea what the photograph was taken with, I didn't even know they wanted to take pictures, let alone that they actually had.

 

 

As to why the subbie would lie - well, there's any number of reasons - perhaps they wanted to knock off work early, or would have preferred a less dusty job than knocking off tiles/stripping wallpaper, for example. You cant just walk out saying "i can't be arsed doing this any more" or "I want to go back to bed" so youd have to come up with a good reason. I did warn all the relevant parties before they even started that I had cats in case of allergies.

 

 

As I said, the litter tray/smell problem is not really the issue for me - had they said something to me Id have cleaned out the tray there and then and put it outside, but I do understand why there might be embarrassment or trepidation in asking since one wouldn't know what kind of response one would get.. again, that's not really the problem.

 

 

As to where I'd expect the contractor to relieve himself - well that's not really my problem to be honest, it is more than just common courtesy to ask someone before using their toilet - I don't particularly want someone elses urine spread all over my toilet seat (we all know that a lot of men are not very particular about lifting the seat before they go, or cleaning it if they don't), nor do I want to sit where an unknown person has sat their bare arse cheeks before cleaning it, so yeah, it is necessary to ask before using someone else's toilet.

 

 

My particular problem here is that because the photograph/s were taken without my permission or knowledge, in a place the contractors were not supposed to be - I have no idea where else or what else was photographed. Since I was not given the opportunity to see these photographs, I have no idea whether the photograph taken was actually my litter tray, or maybe something taken from the internet and sent over - my litter tray is regularly cleaned, and wasn't particularly well used at the time, since the weather has been good and the cats have been going outside as they usually do when its not raining.

 

 

Yes, I am very keen on getting a new kitchen which is why I am particularly vexed that it has now been held up because of a very minor issue such as this, which could have been sorted out with just a word or two, which would also have avoided the HA representative being involved - the contractors came at 8.30am, stayed 10 minutes, then left for an hour to go get supplies. While they were out I rang their supervisor to ask when they'd be back since I needed to go out - he could have told me then, on the telephone, thus avoiding the unnecessary embarrassment of talking to me face to face, but nothing was said, the contractors came back, stripped off the wallpaper and left saying theyd finished.

 

 

EDIT: The supervisor attended with the subcontractors at 8.30, left with them 10 mins later, and did not return. If the smell was bad enough for the subbies to complain about, surely the supervisor would have smelled it too when he stood in the kitchen for that 10 mins discussing what was needed.

Edited by Chayton
Link to post
Share on other sites

The actual question you asked was whether they had the right to take photos.

 

The answer is a clear and unequivocal 'NO'.

 

The why has nothing to do with anything that has been raised by anyone that responded, and everything to do with the fact that you have an expectation of privacy in your own home, and no one has the right to breach that privacy by taking photos in your home or of your things without your express permission.

 

Do you have a claim? Probably not, but there is nothing to stop you writing to the landlord and informing them that they have breached your privacy, that you are not happy about it, and what are they going to offer you in compensation. Expect them to say 'nothing', but there's no harm in asking, or demanding a little something for the breach given the upset it has caused you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...