Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have been sending messageslike " Do you want a refund or not"  which ive said im at work just try and avoid their childish obstuctive replies as ive had enough of them but i plan on going up tomorrow , so my question is,  they have to give me a refund dont they, they can not bargain or refuse the refund if they havent checked the phone first ? Their previous messages have said they want to check the phone first before a refund is given and i think theyll try this tomorrow as they have argued all through this .... If that happens can i just walk away and then send the letter of Particulars which is due next week ? Edit :   Just for the record the phone hasnt been used since buying its been put in a protective bag and put in a draw , its in the same condition as i bought it
    • To be fair ,  she has responded and said she's on holiday but returns Sunday and will bank transfer when she returns and i think i believe her.
    • Checking hi-tech with low tech - Wales leading the way Growing Mid Wales, an organisation set up to bring together the private and public sectors alongside the Welsh Government, has launched a mobile mapping project to track areas of poor mobile phone signal Powys and Ceredigion. They will be using bin lorries which have signal detection equipment installed, and thus able to create a comprehensive map of mobile 'not-spots' in the area, since those vehicles will be visiting just about every property in the area on their usual rounds. Just a moment... WWW.THINKBROADBAND.COM  
    • Hi there   thank you for the reply. No, it's not a silly question at all. I am convinced I didn't hit anything with my car. I was going very slowly and it was the guy standing next to his lorry in the road who punched and kicked my car as I went by. It's cause I saw him do it in the mirror.  I initially thought he did it because he thought I was passing him maybe too closely whilst he was messing around with his lorry ?  That's why I stopped and got out and asked what he thought he was doing hitting my car. He then just hurled abuse at me. Not making any accusations such 'you hit me' 'you hit my lorry' or you did this or that. He just swore and shouted at me. At which point I said I would be making a complaint to his company for his threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I went to my car , got my phone to take a photo of his number plate but then he came towards me again and I thought if he now hits me I am going to come second. I am a woman in her mid 50s travelling on her own and this guy looked like a Millwall football supporter (short, rotund, skin head) so I decided to leave this situation. I got back in my car closed the door and drove off before he could reach me.  I later checked my phone and noticed the photo was too blurred, as I turned and rushed back to my car too quickly before the camera could focus. So I thought it was pointless making a complaint as the guy couldn't be traced anyway, so I forgot all about it until yesterday. But this is all I can think of, it must have to do with this incident as it is in the same street.   
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Left job, not paid.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3350 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I am after some advice as im real confused, please bear with me while i give you some background story.

 

a couple months back (jan) i handed in my notice after finding a new job, we had received a bonus for Christmas which stated it was also for the hard work we had done for 2014.

 

Anyway, after saying they may want the bonus back, i carried on with my day to day duties. No more was said about paying it back.

 

Pay day comes round and everyone gets paid except me. (i have 2 weeks of my notice period left at this point) Being first thing in the morning of pay day i confront the person in charge and they replied that they do indeed want the bonus back and we sit down and sort out how they get it back.

 

I am given a few options like working the next 2 weeks of my notice for free, and ill get my wages owed upto the point of payday. Or if i work 1 week ill get 900 and something. etc..

 

They said i could pay back 100pound a month back for 10months, i offered 50 for 20 but that wasn’t good enough.

 

The bonus was 1500, but they said they wanted 1000 back as i would have paid tax etc.. and 1000 was a round enough figure.

 

Anyway i ended up walking out as i was basically financially held to ransom.

 

I don’t feel like i should had to pay the bonus back as the letter stated it was for 2014 and it isn’t to influence nor an incentive for 2015 and future years with the company, but said i would pay back 50 over 20 months just to get my wages.

 

I am a bit confused as with the contract side i never got one when i joined and about a year later they were issued to everyone (it is only a small company) and it doesn’t say anything about repayment of monies owed. It is very basic. It also said at the end of the contract that they wanted them back within 7 days signed, or they would take it that we verbally agree to the terms. (another matter – I have been told that verbally agreeing it more law abiding that signing to agree, so unsure if I really had a contract or not)

I am owed around 3 weeks wages which I roughly work out just over 1000pound.

I did ring Acas but the lady was very unhelpful at the time and got me of the phone with in 15secs.

 

Where do I stand with this?

 

Is it worthwhile pursing with this, i have been told by my new jobs HR dept, that i would have a case.

 

Many thanks for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm inclined to suspect that the company acknowledged that the bonus was due and owing as they paid it to you - they can't really claim retrospectively otherwise if it was legitimately earned during the course of 2014.

 

Further, without a contract, the company's actions in withholding wages is an unlawful deduction (whether or not any bonus was owing).

 

I think it's worth pursuing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ditto to what Becky has said above!

 

Plus my thoughts, as you are leaving the company, then the company really don't care about you anymore and are trying to get some money from you.

I have no idea of payroll or accounts, but would suggest that as they have paid you £1,500.00 and only want £1,000.00 returned, there is some also added benefit to them in relation to tax?

Possibly hidden accounts (from your £1,000.00).

 

Your new employers HR dept has already said you have a case. Go for it! What have you got to lose? (apart from 1k if you decide to repay it)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you were paid a bonus (tax and NI deducted so not a gratuity) for a period of time that has passed and unles it specifically says in your employment contrcat that this bonus is conditional in being in employment for a given amount of time after its award there is no legal reason for them to demand anything. Even if it is in the contract it is most likely a condition that has been found to be unlawful by an ET some 4 years ago so doesnt mean a bean anyway.

Dont feel as though you have to pay anything and if you didnt have a contract it cannot be considered a normal term of employment for an implied contract. You may well have a case to recover anything you have handed over/ been paid short for and I bet the employer will not want to go down the legal route as they may well have a lot of things they dont want uncovered.

Tell your employer you expect to be paid for the work you do, as required by law and invite them to sue you if they think that they have a leg to stand on regarding the bonus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all.

 

Thanks for the replies thus far.

 

I did shortly hear through the grapevine after I left that he said to someone they didn't have a leg to stand on but was playing hard to get.

 

I was prepared at the time to forget about it as i couldnt be bothered to fight it if it came to that. It has now started to effect me money wise and I don't see it fair that technically I worked 3 weeks for nothing.

 

I was told in this discussion I had they felt cheated as I had just had two weeks of for Xmas which was included in December's wages, and technically I could owe more but is willing to call quits there and then.

 

knowing how they work (quite aggresive/threatening business people) is probably the reason I have yet to do anything about it. But as I am running out of time I need too.

 

Thanks for reading and replies thus far.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have 2 route open to you to get back any money outstanding.

 

Unlawful deduction of wages can be taken to an employment tribunal. BUT the down payment is higher.

 

Anything under £10k can go through small claims court.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant treaten you with anything now you no longer work for them. Either grasp the nettle or pay them back the money that YOU have earned and stop complaining that you have been hard done by. You have to help yourself if you want something, we can advise you on how to go about things but we cant make your decisions for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Thanks for the input so far.

 

I have decided i am going to go SCC route as i cannot afford the up front payment of the Triburnal.

 

I am first writing a letter to ask for payment not recieved.

 

Is there anything i should defo put in.

 

I have wrote this so far.

 

As you know, on the xxxxxxx 2015 I took the decision to leave the company 2 weeks earlier than my notice period due to the fact you were not going to pay me that month’s wages due to “claiming back” a bonus paid to me in 2014.

 

Due to the letter dated xxxxx December (See attached). It stipulates it is not to set a precedent for 2015 or future years.

As the contract you supplied does not mention any overpaid or bonus monies to be repaid upon leaving the business, and after seeking legal advice, I am writing to you to pay Three weeks wages

I make this to the total of £xxx post tax. (£xxx pre tax).

Failure to respond to this letter within fourteen days of the date above, will leave me no option to take further legal action.

 

Is this the sort of points i need to make in the letter. ?

 

I just wanted to check before i send as i havent had to do anything like this before.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a point to note, the District Judge at the county court will want to know why you did not go to an Employment Tribunal first.They are all covered under HM Courts and Tribunal service. You cannot really use fees as an excuse because if you are unemployed or on low income fee exemptions are in place. The issue with any pay of bonus payments should be resolved first with the company Grievance procedure

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Capquest, thanks for pointing that out, i wasnet aware.

 

The reason i havent is because the 3 months is due to expire around the 26th so i believe i am too late for that.The reason is i cannot afford the fees they ask. Im not on low income but my wages covers my bills etc. The savings i had went on paying the bills in the month i wasent paid.

 

Will this go against me if i jump straight into the County Court option?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that a simple county court small claims case for unpaid monies due under contract of employment would involve far less in the terms of court resources and expenditure to all parties involved.

 

An excellent reason to suggest to the judge why it would be issued in a small claims over that of an employment tribunal :D

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...