Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is not a fine, thread title updated and fine changed to charge in 1st post. also can you post up the defence you filed and the court directions have you received ukpc WS yet? if so scan all that up to. read upload carefully one mass pdf only. dx
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Could you let us have the information we ask for in the forum sticky please? We need the information to start working on your case. Once we have that, I'll get you to answer a different set of questions. Best, HB
    • Hi there,  Long story short, I was working a year ago in a city centre and the site operator I was working with told me I could park in a private car park as they had an arrangement with the owner. I came back to a parking charge  from UK Parking Control, and the site operator subsequently couldn't get hold of the private car park owner and haven't been able to since. Fast forward to today, I have received multiple legal threats from DCB Legal acting for UK Parking Control I have now been issued with a court hearing along with a date. I have to file my witness statement for a court hearing later this summer.  I realise that I could have handled the situation better and am already aware of that. I was wondering what my options are at this stage? I am very keen to avoid a CCJ as it would obviously be disastrous for my credit score. Any advice appreciated. My current plan is to file a witness statement and hope the case is discontinued. Thank you for any advice in advance.
    • I run a small retail business selling cards & gifts ( all my sales are done on a face - face basis  ) & noticed one of the settlement amounts on the card terminal bank deposits was short so contacted the card company which said a customer has requested a chargeback on a sale the reason saying the goods bought was not fit for the purpose purchased for. I have old fashion till which does not show any sales or descriptions of what is bought, plus when the settlement statements match up i shred the sale receipts. The card company told me the transaction was paid for with the customers phone & shows on my portal. They have asked me for sales prof, cctv, terminal receipt of the transaction which I have none, as this was done a few weeks later. I have asked for pictures to prove the items are not fit for the purpose purchased for plus said if the customer can return them i would give them a full refund but have had nothing back plus no pictures. Also I have had no communication with the customer even asking me for a full refund. They have now closed the case & awarded the customer the full refund. Any advice would much be appreciated   
    • First Direct has relaunched its £175 switching deal just two weeks after its last switching deal ended due to demand from customers.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

police caution shoplifting SCOTLAND **RESOLVED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3042 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, apologies if this has been asked before - i did search

 

i wonder if someone could offer some advice please?

 

Totally out of character I shoplifted some items from a shop and was ultimately caught.

 

I know it was incredibly stupid, I've never done anything like that before.

 

The police were called and they questioned me in the security office.

Im in my 30s and I have never been in trouble with the police before.

They cautioned me and escorted me off the premises.

 

[Edit: the police actually took my home as they said they needed to confirm who I was.

They said since the only ID had was a provisional licence and sometimes people move without updating licence.

The picture on the licence is 9 years old so i do look slightly different now - another reason to take me home.

 

I still live with my parent & officers came in to check I was who i said I was.

I lied to my dad saying i was a witness to car accident & police kindly dropped me of so they could confirm details.

 

Police had said they wouldnt mention the theft to my dad. How pathetic that at 30 I'm terrified my dad will find out :( ]

 

The police said they will send a report to the Procurator Fiscal who will decided how to proceed.

 

Can anyone offer advice on what I can expect to happen.

 

I know what I did was stupid & i feel awful about the who incident so please i don't need judgements just advice please.

 

i am sick with worry about this.

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

You know, I'm not sure how the Scottish Legal system works. I would imagine that the Procurator Fiscal is very similar to the CPS in England. It really does depend on the circumstances as to whether they proceed with a criminal action or not. A case of wait and see.

 

Hopefully the Scottish regulars will see this and offer some better advice. I will change the thread title to reflect that you are in Scotland

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks silvefox, sorry I meant to add that it was Scotland. Thanks for updating it.

 

Any idea of how long i need to wait for outcome.

 

 

The police said he needs to submit his report to Procurator within 2 weeks.

 

 

How long can I expect to wait to hear from Procurator?

 

 

I know if will differ case to case just wondering about estimated times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again sorry to ask another question.

 

I've been trying to find more info about this online

 

from what I've read seems to suggest that in order for me to be officially 'Cautioned' as in it is on my criminal record,

that I must sign a document stating that I agree to the Caution.

 

This didn't happen when I was questioned by police in the stores security office.

 

One officers checked my name on the Police computer and asked questions about why i did it, have i ever done this before.

 

His partner returned and ask a few more questions.

 

Before I was escorted out of building the 2nd officer said he was issuing a caution on the grounds of theft etc

and did I understand & did I have anything to say.

TBH I didn't take all of what he said in.

 

Does this mean that I have not been formally Cautioned yet?

 

And that I must await the Prosecutor Fiscal's decision?

 

Of course I know a caution is likely (Excuse my naivety I just don't fully understand the process)

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

issued a caution

 

 

that's the end of it.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

Just to make sure I understand you.

 

Do you mean that it IS a caution in the sense that it's on my record and should wait to hear the PF's decision.

 

Or that there will be no further action i.e.

 

I will get letter from Police/PF stating or confirming this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that the PC gave you 'a verbal' caution there and then.

 

you wont here anything more.

 

9/10 unless the sums involved are high

from sort of personal experience, you get a verbal 'ticking off'

[simply 'a note' in his pocket book.]

 

that's the end of it.

 

I would doubt its recorded anywhere other than the on the police national computer system..

 

in case you do something silly again.

 

it does not [well in this persons situation] appear on any searches anywhere.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx100uk - thanks again for your input and for setting my mind at rest.

Somewhat at least.

Don't think I'll relax until I've receive notice of the outcome.

 

I really hope that it is what you advise.

Then I can put this whole sorry mess behind me.

 

In reply to dx100uk's post.

The sum involved was around £500.

(Some expensive cosmetics and perfume).

 

Its a high value so I think I should be anticipating more than just this 'verbal warning'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Police caution will appear on an enhanced disclosure and may have to be notified to a prospective employer

in the same way as a criminal record is for a certain amount of time.

 

However, it is "spent" a lot sooner and if it is properly issued you should have been given a caution notice-piece of paper

saying what the caution was for, date etc.

 

If you were interviewed under caution this is different and means that what you say can be used as evidence if a prosecution is brought against you.

 

If the latter I'm sure that you will receive something through the post saying that your are required to attend another interview etc within a short time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

The police didn't mention the word caution before asking me any questions in the store security office.

That's why I'm a little confused.

They only said it after they finished their questions and were were leaving.

I guess I'll just need to wait and see

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the rules seem to be different in Scotland, I would expect that due to the value of goods taken that this officer will report this to the 'higher ups' who will make the decision however, I am surprised that you were not formally interviewed under caution at a police station. I would expect that to be the next step although I could be totally wrong (which has been known)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

Would that mean that they would come to my home an take me to the station or send letter asking me to attend?

I'm terrified with every car that goes by that it the police coming to my home to cart me off to the station.

 

I know I have to answer for what I did and deal with the legal aspect.

However, I would rather family/friends/neighbours find out about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

it would be in a letter.

 

I'm a bit concerned upon the level of this [£500]

and that you've slipped in extra details in post one since people have replied too.

 

what were the goods and from where please

and were the good intact and the store? got them back.

 

now you have updated things

I'm not so sure you'll not hear further upon this.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in a panic last night and forgot to add all the info.

 

The store in question was Boots.

The items were some Chanel products and some other expensive skincare.

Yes the goods were recovered in intact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ouch

 

you might be lucky

but I doubt it.

 

how long has this been going on?

 

done it before?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only happened yesterday.

 

This is the first time ive ever done anything like this before. Or had any dealing with police.

The officer didnt mention anything about having to go to station.

Just that he's sending report to procurator fiscal & he needs to do that within 2 weeks.

 

So I guess I will be expecting to be asked to go to station very soon

Would it be advisable to call the local police station & ask if i am likely to be called in?

I'm not certain that the officers came from there though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I'd sit on your hands

 

you never know. you might be lucky

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, i'll do as i suggest.

This not knowing is making me sick.

I know its what i deserve though.

 

Do you think the police will contact me to confirm the report has been sent to Procurator or will i just need to wait until the Procurator contacts me?

 

Sorry for all the questions, i really do appreciate all the replies.

Have been reading other posts & all posters are fully of great advice.

Kudos for the

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will know when a letter arrives waht is going to happen but if you dont get a letter then you can take it that the decision is no further action.

 

 

Going to a police station and asking wont get you any further, it will be dealt with by a single officer

and unless you know who that is anyone else at the satation wont be able to tell you any sooner tahn the letter will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply ericsbrother. I thought that might be the case

 

I spoke to a solicitor on the phone today. He said pretty much the same - just wait & see what correspondence i receive either from police or PF

Edited by peggysue122
pressed 'post' too soon
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for yet another question.

 

When i was detained in the shop's security office the store's security asked for ID & I gave him my provisional licence.

 

The security officer from the shopping centre also took a note of my details from licence.

(I know now after reading on here that i didnt have to give details to anyone other than police but I was in a state)

 

I presume that the store security took my details to pass onto the likes RLP.

But I wondered why the centre's security took details.

Was this to send a letter banning me from the centre?

He did say I was banned.

 

He took my picture and informed me I was banned from the centre,

that they had facial recognition cameras & the police would be called.

 

Would the really have facial recognition cameras?

 

I can't see that they they would have such technology to scan every face that enters the shopping area.

 

I have briefly spoken to solicitor on the phone but i wasn't able to ask him all the questions I had so I hope you guys here don't mind me asking here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt were much they do have face rec.

its a common scare tactic.

 

pers I think you'll not here anything more 'official'

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I could be as optimistic about not hearing anything back.

I'm expecting that I'll be cited to go to court.

 

The solicitor I spoke with didn't say either way but I'll expect the worst until I hear something back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received at letter from RLP as expected.

They state that I owe their client £250.

The envelope has "Retail Loss Prevention" printed on the front, done by the franking machine I guess.

 

I'm not looking forward to trying to intercept the post for the next 8-12months to get the letters before anyone else in the house does.

 

I was reading this thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?439604-Shoplifted-from-Superdrug

And the OP emailed RLP instructing them only to contact him/her by email which RLP said they would comply with.

 

I was thinking of doing this myself but wondered if RLP would still comply as Im not a minor unlike the OP in the thread I linked.

 

I was also wondering if I instruct a company to only contact me be a certain method, must they abide by it?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope

once Jackie knows she has a weapon over you she'll use it all the more.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...