Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I think we normally recommend people to follow the upload link
    • I removed them as they have my email address on them, and so shall repost them once my Snagit scrolling capture thing starts working (needs reinstalling I think as it keeps falling over); they are an email that runs over two pages, so would be best suited to a scrolling capture. As for multi page formats, this is harder as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking
    • Oh that is very helpful, thanks a million for answering my query. Looking at the license right now. At the front it says the issue date is 2022 (that's when I swapped it), but at the back it says 2015 next to Category B. So, I'm definately at 12 points, right?  
    • The two PDF documents that you posted earlier are unavailable. I don't know why but maybe they are corrupt. I have deleted them Please will you post up again. Also please can you post multiple PDF documents in a single file multipage format, correct order right way round et cetera. Thank you  
    • The New Drivers Act sees a driver's licence revoked if he accrues six points within two years of becoming a qualified driver. If you passed your test in an EU country, then that is the date you became a "qualified driver" for the purposes of that Act.  For drivers who became qualified more than two years previously, if they accrue twelve or more points within a three year period they face a mandatory six month disqualification unless they can persuade the court that they or others will face "exceptional hardship" if they are banned.  In both cases, the dates of the offences are used to calculate the relevant period.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Application of drivers details from police for alledged 'offence' in school car park


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

my partner has received a notice for her details from the police for an alleged "action" in a car park used by mums picking up kids from pre-school.

 

it states the Application is for the drivers details for alledged driving

dangerously, carelessly or without consideration for other persons,

contrary to sections 2 and 3 of the road traffic act 1988.

 

They want the details of the driver on the date of the incident before they say anything else about the alleged offence.

 

 

Their form is leading as if you fill it out it confirms you were driving (2 months ago)

but either of us rarely drive as we live within a 3 minute walk.

 

 

even if my partner did, which she cant remember - what does this mean, what are our rights?

 

Many Thanks in advance

 

TSF

 

Will this form

Link to post
Share on other sites

You probably have an obligation as owner to provide details of the driver at the time. Being unable/unwilling to normally incurs a penalty in itself and/or prosecution for alleged offense.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's the way the letter reads a bit further down so if needs be we will send the details off.

 

 

However she cannot remember anything happening, and definitely no collision or reversing into another car for example

has occurred as we are honest people if anything like that was to happen.

 

If its just 1 persons word against another, without cameras or other evidence, how do we stand?

 

It feels like you are guilty as it has been raised against you, unless you prove your innocence?

 

What are the best options here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the moment they are only asking who the driver is, and the reason for asking.

You will likely commit an offence by not giving those details as best you have them.

 

Do some due diligence to see if the car was in the car park at that time,

check mobile phone texts and calls ("hi honey, on my way to pick up the kids..."),

bank statements (did you buy something from a nearby shop or fill up with petrol?) and so on.

 

You mention you rarely drive as it's so close, did you perhaps drive as you were on your way to somewhere else afterwards?

 

As it stands, they must have received a report from someone with your car details so the car must have been there at some point.

 

If the alleged matter is just a car park prang, then it will probably go no further as the police will leave it up to the insurance companies to sort out.

 

If it's more than that, or the police want more information

they might ask to "pop round for a chat",

 

 

at this point I would decline to be interviewed at home and instead attend the police station.

 

This means you then have a solicitor attend with you under the legal aid system.

 

Do not make the mistake in thinking

"well I haven't done anything wrong so why do I need a solicitor - that will make me look guilty!".

That simply isn't true.

Apologies for the formatting in my posts, I do put paragraphs in but the forum removes them for some reason :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless you can prove that no-one was driving that day

you are going to have to say who was likely to be driving the vehicle

then you will get a chance to make a statement later.

 

 

I had a similar form for a speeding offence

 

 

I eventually went on a speed awareness course rather then try to prove

that the offence did not occur as the car was parked up that day.

 

 

If I had been prosecuted then I could have shown good evidence to prove my claims

but sometimes easier to avoid the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...