Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My ex blamed me for her not paying her bills she says I controlled her money. So I have been told I need to pay them as it was my fault. She has not paid the bills where she lives now which was my house. I'm not allowed contact with her and again she is blaming me. As in this type of case it is victim led so no matter what stupid thing she says she is believed. It is for me to prove otherwise.
    • No SAR yet but they have confirmed via email that they have everything and will supply it by this month end.    When you say the FOS considered it a personal loan due to personal guarantee who is the FOS? Financial Ombudsman?  But then that doesn’t make sense as they haven’t been involved yet.    Santander in their final response to my original complaint did not agree to it. They turned my complaint down and specified that the selling dealership had agreed to treat it as personal for settlement purposes.    I guess they could not agree to it as then they would be guilty of miss selling but they gave me what I wanted by saying I would not get treated as a business customer in regards to finance charges.    Awful bank to deal with. Will never touch them again. 
    • Background I am in dispute with Clerical Medical over, amongst other things, statements that I haven't received. They didn't resolve my complaint in time so invited me to complain to the FOS, which I did The FOS investigator in his findings has written that  Clerical Medical have provided all missing statements apart from two. One of these is for the policy year 2021 - 2022, which they say is unavailable due to a system migration. I have twice asked the FOS investigator for a copy of his screen shot to try and resolve this discrepancy but they have ignored me so today I submitted a subject access request. I said I was primarily interested in the screen shot but I also asked for everything they held against the complaint reference number. The response I got from firstly the Data Protection Operations Senior Coordinator, then secondly the investigator was that  The investigator expanded on this and said I'll wait the 40 days and see what they come back with then make a decision on next steps at that point, but I want to make sure I've got my facts in the right order before I start arguing with them. They seem to be saying that my SAR doesn't cover the screen shot because it isn't personal data but I disagree. I have a reference number that identifies my complaint and therefore indirectly identifies me. I think that means everything that is held against that reference number, including the screen shot, is my personal data and is in scope of my SAR (subject to exemptions). Who is right?
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • You sure it's a Section 48 notice? Section 48 notice is just telling you who your landlord is. Have they sold and they're just telling you who your new landlord is or is it an actual eviction notice? Might be best scanning it up just in case here.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unum PHI and ESA


rrrachel
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I have read quite a lot of posts on this forum but either can't find the answer or don't understand, so I am hoping someone might be able to help or point me in the right direction

 

I have been unable to work for quite some time (due to severe nerve damage caused by spinal cord tumour, extreme back pain , part of my spine was removed during tumour sugery, bladder issues, osteoperosis, pituitary failure, depression and I have to use crutches to walk and require a lot of help to do day to day tasks) and I was approved for PHI starting 24 july through work. I dont pay any premiums for this and my pay slip is still through work, so I guess unum pay them and they pay me.

 

any benefits I may he entitled to are deducted from my phi payment, so I was advised I would have to claim esa seperately.

 

now here is where I struggle, I was advised that I would not be eligible for the income related esa, even though I have no savings, and that I may be eligible for contribution based.

 

I had an interview at the job centre earlier this week to look at steps to get me to return to work (which when I explained my situation he said that I should not have been called in for this interview and thanked me for attending as it was clearly very difficult for me to. He then checked and asked me if I had received any esa payments so far and I said no and he said I should write a letter and call the job centre to speak with people that would deal with my claim.

 

lookihg at the paperwork from when I first applied, I believe that something somewhere along the line was wrong, as when I alled to make the claim initially the person I spoke with didnt know what phi was and I explained it.

 

so on my claim form it says in the following:

 

Personal or occupational pension

received or waiting to receive any income from pension, permanent health insurance or compensation payment - YES

 

Your pension income details

income type - private health insurance

 

then in the next field in permanent health insurance, it says 'contributed more than half the premiums toward any permanent heakth insurance payment' and NO next to that

 

when I received this I called to query it ahd they said it was correct, but then after my meeting at the jobcentre I now believe the paperwork is incorrect and this is why I havent been paid anything so far

 

is there anyone who could give me any advice on this or know what I would need to write in the letter? Just it seems no one can advise when I call the esa people, as they have always not understood what I meant when I said I am on PHI

 

any help would be hugely appreciated

thanks in advance

Rachel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re reading my initial post I can see I was probably rambling a bit. I carried on researching and have spoke to the job centre and sent a letter to explain my phi payment is not a pension, and asked to re look at my claim

thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if this will help. My wife gest a UNUM payment every month and it is not taken into consideration as it is not a pension or an income. UNUM and the government walk hand in hand. After all what is the point of employers paying into UNUM if the employee is going to be penalised?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfer

thAnk you for your reply. Does your wife get income related and contribution based esa or just contribution based? The payment I receive has ESA deducted and I am told to claim this seperateoy. Luckily the man at the job centre I saw said that he will help if I dont get a response from jy letter, not sure what he can do but we will see!!

 

Thanks for your response :)

Rachel

Link to post
Share on other sites

PHI is also known is Income Protection, they may understand this term better. The scheme you are in is a Group Income Protection scheme and is arranged by your employer. The specific scheme will have been sent up to pay you a fixed percentage of your salary in the event that you are off work after a certain amount of time with an illness or injury.

 

While the benefit on offer can vary from scheme to scheme, the vast majority of income protection schemes are set up to exclude ESA & WRAC payments as its cheaper for your employer, from the sounds of things this is the type you are in so this will be deducted from your insurer payments regardless of the fact that you may not be receiving it. So you should be receiving what ever percentage the scheme is set up minus the ESA & WRAC amount which is £5,624 for the 2014/15 year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfer

thAnk you for your reply. Does your wife get income related and contribution based esa or just contribution based? The payment I receive has ESA deducted and I am told to claim this seperateoy. Luckily the man at the job centre I saw said that he will help if I dont get a response from jy letter, not sure what he can do but we will see!!

 

Thanks for your response :)

Rachel

 

She used to get the contribution ESA plus the UNUM payment. She is now retired but stills receives the UNUM payment which does not affect her pension credit payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just to give an update, I was due to hear back today but didn't so I phoned, and the lady took my details and arranged a call back.

got the call back from the reconsideration team and was told it had gone through and has been sent for processing.

 

So I wont say it is a success until i get the letter through! Fingers crossed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

just another little update, received a call this morning to say the letter I sent went missing (I explained about my contact last week when the lady had received the letter and was being sent for processjng etc...) so they have asked me to send it again....

very frustrating!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned again today and he said on my recird it shows the letter and iasked him to check previous entries on my record which they did reluctantly, and the previous one said they had received and have passed to be processed. he is now trying ti find out which of these entries is correct, and will call me back today or tomorrow. I have resent the letter after they said they lost it but I just want to ge this resolved asap!

fingers crossed (if I could cross them as the use of my hands is getting worse again!!)

thanks and will krep you updated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...