Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Not UK resident, CCJ in my absence - need N244 and bailiff advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3523 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've spent a couple of long evenings searching the forum and reading threads but havent been able to find anyone with quite the same situation, so I thought I would sign up and make my first post to ask for a little help regarding a CCJ, bailiffs and the correct way to handle an N244 application.

 

My situation is that I left the UK about six years ago, got married and now live and work in eastern europe (EU member state). I have only now found out that a CCJ has been made in my absence for an old final mobile phone bill I was sure I had paid when I was emigrating. Its possible that I could have forgotten about it, I havent yet been able to find the paperwork from back then and I closed my bank accounts so i would have to write to make a subject access request to check properly. The judgment was for a sum of around £690 + costs which was entered about three or four months, but now with bailiffs and everything they add on its been inflated to about £1200 although for some reason the order was made (or requested by the creditor perhaps?) for monthly payments of £50 rather than the full amount. No idea why. Anyway, the payments obviously havent been made so an order for enforcement has been made.

 

I have only just been made aware of this situation as Lowells seem to have bought the debt from O2 at some point and a CCJ was obtained at my parents address where I lived for a short while before moving - they just got a bailiffs enforcement notice. The debt, if it turns out I do still owe it, would be statute barred in the next three or four months, which must be why they decided to go for a judgment.

 

I've asked dad to write to the court and bailiffs notifying that I havent lived there for years so they don't get bothered by someone trying to take their stuff. Is there anything else I should ask them to do so the bailiffs don't try barging in on my elderly parents regarding something that really doesn't concern them at all? Should my parents give them an alternate mail address for me? is there something particular I should ask them to do in this situation?

 

I'd also like some advice on correctly preparing an N244 to ask for the judgment to be set aside on the basis that I am not a UK resident (and I did not receive the court papers if this additionally helps my position). I have no property in the UK and have notified HMRC et al of my depature when I left.

 

Here are my questions about N244 and my request to set aside:

1. how should I word my reply to Q3. on N244 where it says "what order are you asking the court to make and why?" - would something like this suffice: "I respectfully request that the court set aside the above referenced judgement on the basis that I am not a UK resident and did not receive the original claim notice dated xxxx in a timely manner." Is anything additional to this necessary? Do I need to quote any case or civil law in respects to this? Will the court set the judgment aside on this basis alone or do I need additional arguments? Should I also request that any enforcement action be stayed?

 

2. Do i need to attach a draft order (Q4)?

 

3. should I request a hearing (Q5)? can this be set aside without? It will be impossible for me to attend as I simply could not afford to fly back to attend court any time in the near future - would I be able to represent my case sufficiently by the information in 1. above?

 

4. The question "How long do you think the hearing will last? (Q6)" - I'd optimistically like to think 5mins would be enough to consider "not a uk resident - judgment set aside" - but realistically, what should I put here?

 

5. what level of Judge is needed for the hearing (Q8), that can set this aside? Clerk? Master of court? District Judge?

 

6. Who should be served with my N244 application (Q9)? Is this purely for the court or also for the creditor?

 

7. What sort of proof or evidence should be attached - I might have some old letter from HMRC confirming I am no longer resident for tax purposes or possibly get them to confirm that again in writing, I definitely have a foreign language document showing my first non-UK residency address. I could get my parents to give a witness statement to that effect also.

 

8. Is being non-resident justification enough to set this CCJ aside or is there a chance a judge might let the Default order stand?

 

9. Will the creditor get a copy of everything I submit as part of my N244 application? I'm reluctant to give them my new address in eastern europe in case they try to get bailiffs after me out here, though I have a mail forwarding address in the USA which I could use for this purpose. From what I read, the bailiffs in the UK are bad enough, but the ones out here have a reputation for hanging you up in the forest overnight by your feet :!:

 

Thank you in advance for any and all advice you can offer me - this forum is really such a wealth of information...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I've made a little progress on this matter and thought I'd update the thread for the benefit of anyone else in a similar situation - if anyone is able to answer my questions on the remaining points, I'd still be very grateful :)

 

1. how should I word my reply to Q3. on N244 where it says "what order are you asking the court to make and why?"

 

From what I can see, not being resident in the UK at the time of the claim+hearing should be entirely a good enough reason to request the CCJ be set aside. So for Q3 on N244 I am planning to write this:

I respectfully request that the court set aside the above referenced judgement on the basis that I am not currently a UK resident and was not residing in the UK at the time of the claim being issued, nor at the time of the court hearing. Furthermore I did not receive the original claim notice dated XXX.

 

If anything additional to this is necessary, please feel free to comment :) I hope I don't need to any law rules on this but I read somewhere else that CPR6.6 (link to justice.gov removed) applies here ("The claim form must be served within the jurisdiction"). Do I need to quote this in my argument in some way?

 

My only remaining question here is whether I should also request in this part of N244 that any enforcement action be stayed?

 

I found a handy guide at national debtline (link to guide removed) which actually answered some of my remaining questions about N244 - I had done quite a bit of digging when I posted my original thread but I hadnt found that page so apologies for asking un-necessary questions - I'll answer my own questions anyway:

 

2. Do i need to attach a draft order (Q4)?

 

The debtline page above suggests I shouldnt do this, but elsewhere on CAG i've read that I should submit a draft - any help on what this should write in a draft would be hugely appreciated -and should this draft also mention staying enforcement of the CCJ, and should I also ask for costs for my application back?

 

3. should I request a hearing (Q5)? can this be set aside without? It will be impossible for me to attend as I simply could not afford to fly back to attend court any time in the near future

 

The debtline page says that it would probably need a hearing but I'm wondering if I should leave it blank to let the court decide what is necessary?

 

4. The question "How long do you think the hearing will last? (Q6)"

 

Going to leave this blank

 

5. what level of Judge is needed for the hearing (Q8)?

 

Also to be left blank

 

6. Who should be served with my N244 application (Q9)? Is this purely for the court or also for the creditor?

 

Seems that this relates to a solicitor, so will also be left blank.

 

7. What sort of proof or evidence should be attached.

 

Looks like I just need proof I'm not resident so I have a letter from HMRC that I will use in this case.

 

9. Will the creditor get a copy of everything I submit as part of my N244 application?

 

Yes, they do get a copy of the application so I will be bearing that in mind with regards to what information is included in my application.

 

 

I've asked dad to write to the court and bailiffs notifying that I havent lived there for years so they don't get bothered by someone trying to take their stuff. Is there anything else I should ask them to do so the bailiffs don't try barging in on my elderly parents regarding something that really doesn't concern them at all? Should my parents give them an alternate mail address for me? is there something particular I should ask them to do in this situation?

 

This bailiff problem is still something I'm really worried about - I gather the bailiffs are just acting on the courts orders so it seems like they really can try to enforce at my parents address - my dad has written to the court and bailiffs but I don't know if that is enough to stop them visiting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re-reading my last post, its probably a bit of a sprawl and I'm trying to clear up too many points at once - I'll therefore clarify it all by just asking if anyone has an opinion about this one question:

 

From what I can see, not being resident in the UK at the time of the claim+hearing should be entirely a good enough reason to request the CCJ be set aside. So for Q3 on N244 I am planning to write this:

I respectfully request that the court set aside the above referenced judgement on the basis that I am not currently a UK resident and was not residing in the UK at the time of the claim being issued, nor at the time of the court hearing. Furthermore I did not receive the original claim notice dated XXX.

 

If anything additional to this is necessary, please feel free to comment :) I hope I don't need to quote any law rules on this but I read somewhere else that CPR6.6 (link to justice.gov removed) applies here ("The claim form must be served within the jurisdiction"). Do I need to quote this in my argument in some way?

 

should I also request in this part of N244 that any enforcement action be stayed?

 

Will this be enough to set aside the CCJ? Would I also need to provide a defense for the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re-reading my last post, its probably a bit of a sprawl and I'm trying to clear up too many points at once - I'll therefore clarify it all by just asking if anyone has an opinion about this one question:

 

 

 

Will this be enough to set aside the CCJ? Would I also need to provide a defense for the claim?

 

I don't think it will be enough, if you did not tell the creditor you had moved abroad. I have read many people post here, saying Judges have not accepted the gone abroad argument, because the debtor did not advise the creditor they had moved.

 

Think you will have to give arguments about the debt as well. Where you in dispute and did you stay in contact with the creditors ? If so, provide details of this.

 

Was the debt statute barred at the time the court claim was made ? I think you should try to get hold of evidence that supports this, before you submit the set aside application. If you are going to spend £155 on a set aside application, you need to do it properly. You also need to think about what you would do, if a hearing date was set.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it will be enough, if you did not tell the creditor you had moved abroad. I have read many people post here, saying Judges have not accepted the gone abroad argument, because the debtor did not advise the creditor they had moved.

 

Thanks - it seems strange that if I had been able to submit a defense, I could have just submitted proof that I dont live in the UK and not under the jurisdiction of the court in order to have the claim dismissed. Since I don't live in the UK and didnt receive the court claim I obviously couldn't do this, and yet now judgment has been entered it seems I cannot easily get it set aside either...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - it seems strange that if I had been able to submit a defense, I could have just submitted proof that I dont live in the UK and not under the jurisdiction of the court in order to have the claim dismissed. Since I don't live in the UK and didnt receive the court claim I obviously couldn't do this, and yet now judgment has been entered it seems I cannot easily get it set aside either...

 

Yes you cannot easily get it set aside without making an argument about the debt The reason being is that a Judge has to believe that the claim made was faulty in some way or you have an argument to make about the debt, if there was to be a hearing about it. It is not just a set aside because you were not in the UK at the time.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - it seems strange that if I had been able to submit a defense, I could have just submitted proof that I dont live in the UK and not under the jurisdiction of the court in order to have the claim dismissed. Since I don't live in the UK and didnt receive the court claim I obviously couldn't do this, and yet now judgment has been entered it seems I cannot easily get it set aside either...

 

Where are you now living?

 

Being aboard doesn't mean that the claim will automatically be dismissed.

 

What is the size of the debt?

 

If it's a large amount then the CCJ could be set aside and the Claimant given permission to re-serve it on you out of jurisdiction. It just depends if it's financially worth all the hassle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...