Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Npower and back billing.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3600 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just tried to contact npower but they have a wait time of over 1 hour!

 

I thought I would try and get some info here first.

 

we have a letter today from them. Very polite, apologising for not getting in touch sooner about a bill.

 

The problem is that we have been trying to pay the bill.

 

My wife has tried numerous times to set up a direct debit without success.

 

The system will just not set them up for some reason, despite everything looking ok from our side.

 

She has also sent several complaints regarding this issue.

 

She has paid some of the bill via direct transfer, but, sometimes we forget, as nearly everything else is set up by DD.

 

Now, we expect the bill to be quite big as this has been going on for some time.

 

I'm just wondering what options we have.

 

I've read about the back billing which might be a defense here, but if not, what are our options?

 

Bearing in mind we have tried over and over to set up DD

and complained about not being able to on many occasions with no reply.

 

Thanks

 

Lee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lee

 

Follow the following to put your case forward, where it advises phone them don't, keep everything in writing, emails etc:-

 

https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/information-consumers/domestic-consumers/making-enquiry-or-complaint

 

The Backbilling will only help if it's their fault and over 12 months. You could argue that you've tried everything to set up the DD and NPower should have done more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]52639[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]52640[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]52641[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]52642[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]52643[/ATTACH]

 

Found these online, They explain how Npower work out back bills

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to the post that I made yesterday

there is a response below these documents which appears to have been made by an employee

(or maybe ex-employee) of Npower

 

The process that they made us all work is not compliant in the slightest.

 

If a customer receives a late bill and are eligible for back billing, then their account should be worked out to the penny.

 

This should include every payment the customer had made,

(if what they were paying every month covered their consumption then they would get nothing).

 

Every meter reading we received, price changes, tariff discounts and Direct Debit discounts had to be worked out manually

and back billing would be applied.

 

In some cases this would have to be worked out over years.

 

They were not compliant in many ways, but the main one is the calculator they made use didn't take any of these thing in to account.

Straight away they are breaking the law!

 

The process that they forced people to do was just like SAP unfit for purpose.

 

It rewarded people who were quarterly receipt of bill payers but penalised people who had paid continuously by Direct Debit

because in most cases they were in credit when they were eventually billed up to date and they would get nothing.

In fact they would be lucky if they if they got their own money back!

 

Every account i was made to work and issue back billing refunds were incorrect,

but they made us send them out anyway.

 

 

The accurate billing rules would appear to mean nothing to Npower who are one of the signatories to them.

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...