Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ingeus 'steps to work' programme for ESA WRAG claimant (MH)


keiko78
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Mr P

I am using Intraining/ingeus and they do indeed pay travel expenses in cash , if the normal person is working you do not even have to show receipts once they know you. Needless to say they do not offer the repayment you need to ask so I do my best to make sure people know :evil:

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I read those two articles and maybe i am wrong but I am not convinced that this is official policy. Sadly once you start to issue league tables etc managers do not (understandably) want to be at the bottom of that table . This is where the lines get blurred . I have seen this happen in the private sector especially when targets are unrealistic so some people bend the rules, then those that stick to the rules fall down the league table and on and on

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mr P

I am using Intraining/ingeus and they do indeed pay travel expenses in cash , if the normal person is working you do not even have to show receipts once they know you. Needless to say they do not offer the repayment you need to ask so I do my best to make sure people know :evil:

 

Well i got a nice suprise today because Ingeus HCP paid my travel expenses including arrears in cash muller. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Keiko

Sometimes (but not always) I think it is unfair the way we talk about and treat our WP advisors. Again , sometimes it is worth meeting in the middle.

You are on ESA?

What is the harm in giving them an email address

Play the game up to a certain point

If you only have to go in every few weeks is it the end of the world ?

 

As for the C.V, the one she wrote was IMHO pretty crap and certainly not one that suits me . My sister who is a professional career advisor within higher education helped me do a much better one. I have nodded and taken the C.V. I have filed it on my PC and if I were to apply for a job I would send out the CV i like.

I then apply for the odd job here and there , not because I am fit to do it but because it keeps them off my back.

 

When I see the attitude of some of the jobseekers I wonder how they have not all been sanctioned , for an example, one lad needed his birth certificate to register with an agency. Week after week he didn't try to get it so one week she provided the money for the bus AND the money for the certificate upfront. Two weeks later he still hadn't been

 

I treat anybody with respect who treats me with respect and when they don't I find them difficult to work with because of the imbalance. Unfortunately people who are WP Advisors or in my case a Steps to work Advisor they don't have a very good reputation for being respectful to their clients. When advisors work in underhanded ways, throwing out sanctions to manipulate people in a bullish way and not working in a transparent way they surely have an agenda just to meet targets and keep their jobs and it is not the wellbeing of the client thats the focus.

 

I'm disabled so without going into detail on a public forum, I like to know my rights so that I'm not a push over and don't end up feeling more unwell due to the programme's agenda, I try with the help of my own medical team to manage my condition. So I always appreciate the feedback to my queries about whether I have to provide an email or how often I am mandated to go in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a letter this week out of the blue telling me that the usual Employment Advisor will no longer be seeing me. I am now invited to attend an appointment this week at their office but have not been provided with a name or job title for this new mystery person so I'm feeling somewhat left in the dark! So frustrating. A new chapter begins...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter this week out of the blue telling me that the usual Employment Advisor will no longer be seeing me. I am now invited to attend an appointment this week at their office but have not been provided with a name or job title for this new mystery person so I'm feeling somewhat left in the dark! So frustrating. A new chapter begins...

 

Could you elaborate, who is the letter from and what does it say exactly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It helps to get these people on the ropes anyway you can then they leave you alone when they know your no push over and refuse to give away your rights. This HCP has now ceased asking me to sign the forms although she does bring them into the room lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I would add to this

Yesterday my In training advisor told me that she had booked me on a course , 5 days 7 hours a day. I told her that I didn't think I would be able to cope with it so she took me off. Maybe I am lucky

 

As it happens I will almost certainly be signing off at the end of september to go to Uni , hopefully once I have the definite offer she will cut me loose

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you elaborate, who is the letter from and what does it say exactly?

 

This letter is from the current Employment Advisor. Which tells me that the date of my next appointment is this week not a different week.

 

The Employment Advisor informs me that "my next appointment will be with a lady who will work with me for the last 12 months of the Steps to Work programme." That's all I'm being told.

 

I'm wondering if it's normal for a change of Employment Advisor in the last 12 months of this type of programme? Or whether it is going to be somebody in a different role?

Edited by keiko78
I waffle sometimes and at others I repeat myself! :P
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I attended my appointment this week, to find out at reception that I wasn't on their list to see anyone today. Great, so I had a stressful day for nothing. Grrr! The receptionist then went away and came back to tell me that my next appointment date is in 6 weeks time, didn't I get the letter? Err no I didn't! They just confuse me.

The letter arrived this morning from Ingeus, 10 days after the letter date, stating my activities for the next appointment will be "to attend appointment with new advisor (full name) and start 2nd year".

 

Anyway, it was good to learn that I can now be Ingeus stress free for 6 weeks, phew!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

With summer and one thing or another I've been unable to get online to add my last appointment to this thread. So here is a short version of what I remember.

 

The new woman arrives in the private waiting room, she says who she is but not what she does (This seems to be the norm).

 

She goes straight into asking me ''How are things with you?'' and ''Has anything changed since attending my last appointment with xxxxxx (the previous Employment Advisor)?''

I said that I was looking at courses and will start a new one in September when I've decided.

 

Then she asked ''And have your meds changed?'' to which I responded ''Errr no.'' (I haven't told her I do or don't take meds)

So she came back with ''What no they haven't? Or no you're not taking any?''

It was very awkward because I do take meds but I didn't want to talk to her about it.

 

Towards the end of the appointment she offered me 'my' travel expenses of £xx.xx (saying it like I always receive travel expenses) to which I told her I don't travel by public transport and I've never received any travel expenses.

 

A few days later I received the follow-up standard Ingeus letter through the post telling me the date of the next appointment, which also included the 'agreed action' at my last appointment which has now become mandatory! There was no agreement in it, I was going to do a course before I went to the appointment and that didn't change while I was there or when I left.

 

My next appointment is coming up soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then she asked ''And have your meds changed?'' to which I responded ''Errr no.'' (I haven't told her I do or don't take meds)

 

If you get asked this question again, the correct response should be "That is not any of your business - You are not qualified or authorised to discuss matters of that nature."

 

Had a similar exchange with one of these "advisers" and got a grudging apology after giving her a long, hard stare.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say i am rapidly loosing patience with in training . This week the advisor was on about how many people they had found a job for as a company this year . Spin spin spin, or lies, damn lies and statistics.

I am also suspecting that the minority who play the system get a job just as their 2 years are up, do it for a few months then conveniently become unemployed again and so the cycle continues. Of course in training get their bonus for that and anotrher person into work.

 

It really is all BS

I really do refuse to play the game anyore. Two weeks left

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering if it's normal for a change of Employment Advisor in the last 12 months of this type of programme? Or whether it is going to be somebody in a different role?

 

Well, I had 4 different ones while I was with Ingeus. They apparently have the two years divided up into sections so at the end of each one you move on to someone else, so basically if the first adviser can't do anything with you then they give someone else a try at making your life miserable :)

 

First adviser I had - for one interview only - spent her time looking over my shoulder at something which was obviously more interesting and produced a very childish, rubbish CV for me which I never used.

 

Second adviser I had was decent enough to deal with, but did nothing for me apart from finding a whole 2 jobs to apply for during a 6 month period. Wonderful.

 

Third adviser was a miserable ^&*%6 and I took great pleasure in pulling her up for every infraction of the guidelines - and she made many too :)

 

Last one was a car salesman in a previous job and produced literature full of spelling mistakes. 'Fish out of water' summed him up totally.

 

Expect anything from these people - even they don't know what's coming next half the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i got a nice suprise today because Ingeus HCP paid my travel expenses including arrears in cash muller. :-)

 

I claimed ESA in Sept 09. I was eventually put into the Support Group for 3 years. I was 60 in June 2009.

 

 

Yet I had to go to weekly meetings at the local office of the Royal British Legion to set goals to get me back to work and to show the following week that I had made headway into meeting those goals. This went on for over 6 months until I found out that I should have been left alone because (a) I was over 60 and (b) I was in the Support Group. It was voluntary for me to attend but no one told me!

On top of that I had to fund the fuel costs for those visits out of my ESA payments!! No one told me that I could reclaim them!

 

 

Seems that nothing has changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I had 4 different ones while I was with Ingeus. They apparently have the two years divided up into sections so at the end of each one you move on to someone else, so basically if the first adviser can't do anything with you then they give someone else a try at making your life miserable :)

 

First adviser I had - for one interview only - spent her time looking over my shoulder at something which was obviously more interesting and produced a very childish, rubbish CV for me which I never used.

 

Second adviser I had was decent enough to deal with, but did nothing for me apart from finding a whole 2 jobs to apply for during a 6 month period. Wonderful.

 

Third adviser was a miserable ^&*%6 and I took great pleasure in pulling her up for every infraction of the guidelines - and she made many too :)

 

Last one was a car salesman in a previous job and produced literature full of spelling mistakes. 'Fish out of water' summed him up totally.

 

Expect anything from these people - even they don't know what's coming next half the time.

Deloitte-Ingeus used to deploy a 4 Phase Programme, entitled the "Every Day Counts" Service Delivery Model, with a different Welfare To Work Clerk assigned to each candidate as they entered each Phase.. Of course, this was before Deloitte- offloaded its stake in Ingeus, and before Ingeus were sold to a Private Equity Business in the US.

Phase 1 : Insight (Weeks 1-4)

Phase 2 : Intensive Support (Weeks 5-16)

Phase 3 : Skills Plus (Weeks 17-52)

Phase 3.1 Vocational Routeway (13 weeks)

Phase 3.2 Personal Routeway (13 weeks)

Phase 4 Breakthrough (Weeks 53-104)

http://ingeusstaff.co.uk/diagram

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]53291[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get asked this question again, the correct response should be "That is not any of your business - You are not qualified or authorised to discuss matters of that nature."

 

Thanks Mr. P that's a damn fine response to give them, I wish I could have thought of something like that at the time. This has to be my new mantra if (or should I say when) she tries it again. *Goes off to scribble it down on memo pad* :) I didn't expect to get asked such personal questions, it's so intrusive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keiko

Sometimes (but not always) I think it is unfair the way we talk about and treat our WP advisors. Again , sometimes it is worth meeting in the middle.

You are on ESA?

What is the harm in giving them an email address

Play the game up to a certain point

If you only have to go in every few weeks is it the end of the world ?

 

As for the C.V, the one she wrote was IMHO pretty crap and certainly not one that suits me . My sister who is a professional career advisor within higher education helped me do a much better one. I have nodded and taken the C.V. I have filed it on my PC and if I were to apply for a job I would send out the CV i like.

I then apply for the odd job here and there , not because I am fit to do it but because it keeps them off my back.

 

When I see the attitude of some of the jobseekers I wonder how they have not all been sanctioned , for an example, one lad needed his birth certificate to register with an agency. Week after week he didn't try to get it so one week she provided the money for the bus AND the money for the certificate upfront. Two weeks later he still hadn't been

 

why does an agency need a birth certificate, that's excessive and also I wouldn't provide as allows id fraud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly in this day and age you do need ID for most jobs, otherwise the company employing you could be done for £1000 for not providing proof of eligibility to work in the UK....

 

The more difficult you make it for the work providers the worse they come down on you.

 

I turned the tables on my work provider many times by outsmarting them with documentary evidence - and they eventually had to drop their 're-engagement' phase when I temporarily ended up on ESA, went straight back into work after that!

 

They are using a 'one size fits all' method which the system was NOT set up for, it was set up for long-term claimants rather than short term ones, but sadly everyone gets shoved on to them sooner now.

 

The work provider did however pay part of the cost of me getting my passport renewed as it had run out and I could prove I would not be interviewed for a couple of posts (one of which I am still working in now) without a valid passport - I don't drive so I didn't have 'photographic' evidence either.

 

If they had not sent me to the work provider I could have got funding to set up my own business, but because I was with a work provider who was not recognised by the funding provider it was dropped. That was one lot of documentary evidence I used against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why does an agency need a birth certificate, that's excessive and also I wouldn't provide as allows id fraud.

 

I am assuming he didn't have a passport and they were covering their back about work permits etc. To be honest he was not one of the cooperative ones, and if I had been his advisor I would have sanctioned him ( After 4 weeks of asking he had not even applied for his BC and that was in-spite of them offering to give him the money their and then to pay for it and catch the bus to collect it...he never had time! ) One of a tiny minority I know but we need to accept that they exist.

 

I have already had one argument today with someone who is blaming it all on fraudulent claims and sited an example from 20 years ago

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
If you get asked this question again, the correct response should be "That is not any of your business - You are not qualified or authorised to discuss matters of that nature."

 

Had a similar exchange with one of these "advisers" and got a grudging apology after giving her a long, hard stare.

 

Noted with thanks, i will update in my thread shortly as had an interesting experience last week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...