Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The 1Loan (Brokers)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

Family member just rang me to say that they have been to Barclays Bank this morning, to change their Debit cards, as an unauthorised payment of near £60 WAS TAKEN FROM THEIR ACC,

 

The bank changed the cards for them straight away but they would not /could not do a Chargeback of the monies for them and advised to contact the co and either cancel, or request a refund of the monies, through the co procedures.

 

This has apparently occurred as relation was looking for finance on the site of co but did not complete the form nor authorise the co to take any funds and signed out of the site prior to completion.

 

I would have thought Barclays should have done an immediate chargeback from the co and placed monies back into relations acc.

 

I know and have seen the cancellation conditions stated by the co and the Cancellation procedure under the Financial Services (Distance Marketing) Regs 2004 right to cancel within 14 days. By writing to them at:

The 1loan, Beechfield House, Winterton Way, Lyme Green Business Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK11 0LP

 

All advice/info will as usual be gratefully received as to:

1. Address above

2.The limited action/lack of by the Bank.

3. Which will be the better of the courses of action to take, to get the monies back/reimbursed asap, which to my way has been taken with no authorisatation from their acc.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bank is wrong. It can be refunded immediatelt while they investigate.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

renegadeimp,

 

Thank you for your as ever swift reply.

I would have thought that they should have done an immediate chargeback, they have said that no other brokers/ companies can access the acc, as they have blocked it now. Think I will tell them to get back at the bank and again request the immediate chargeback.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the cpa sticky in the pdl forums. First post contains 2 links with the most recent fsa guidelibes/regulations that the banks must abide by.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you once again,

I have just spoken to relative and they have spoken to the bank about an hour ago and they are sticking to their No can do chargeback, they cannot and they will not, even if they made a formal complaint.

 

I will take a look at the guidlines from the FCA.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to speak to a manager not a muppet. If they still refuse, DEMAND they put it in writing as well as employee name, position and ID, as you will be contacting their CEO and making formal complaints to the FCA.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

The unauthorised:-x payment taken by the brokers appears to be a one off fee, not sure if it comes within the remit of a CPA complaint procedure, but it was still taken without authority from relation.

Perhaps as at #1 Distance Marketing regs.

#6 from renegadeimp is my choice but relation is a bit reticent at taking the bank on.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats up to the relation then. There have been a number of threads on CAG where loan brokers take fee's without prior notification, and claim it's in the t&c's. A good few have been successful in claiming back the charges as they were not stated outright and were hidden, and indeed they were unauthorised. However, it always amazes me how people are willing to give their bank and debit card details to a random website, especially ones with dubious names such as 1loan or loans4u

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

renegadeimp,

 

You are so right and I completely agree with you.

 

The fact that the on line application was not completed and was terminated by my relation, is the main reason I want to proceed as far as we can go.

 

After reading a little more it appears that these companys apparently are in business to trap people who change their mind during the initial process and the process goes ahead even after they, in their mind have cancelled the procedure, this really smacks of criminal activity and in particular fraud.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

Sending E-mail today and signed for del letter with RM tomorrow with the following:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I have not and do not, authorise you to provide any services for/to me and I have not authorised, nor proceeded with, nor completed any application with you, to proceed with making unauthorised withdrawls from my account.

 

This activity must cease forthwith and all monies taken, must be reimbursed immediately. Any further attempts at taking unauthorised monies from my account will be met, by making complaints to the Financial Conduct Authority and all relevant regulatory bodies, not excluding the Police. This action will of course incur extra charges for your company.

 

To date you have taken without authorisation the sum of £**.** To save further action being taken against you, these monies must be reimbursed immediately to the following address.

 

I expect a favourable answer within seven days of the receipt of this letter.

 

Let's see what/if reply they come up with.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

This is the response re #10 received today via e-mail.

Signed for del letter received by them 1016 am today.

 

We have received your letter in the post and your refund will be processed accordingly.

Please be advised all refunds are processed within 30 days and are made via card reversal, so it is your duty to inform us if at any point during the 30 day cancellation period you cancel your card.

 

Jordon

Customer Services.

 

My reply will be: Please read my letter again, you have already caused serious problems with my account and please read again where I want my refund to be processed to. Do not ignore this, it will not go away.

 

All comments/advice will be as usual greatly appreciated.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hello All,

What a fiasco trying to nail this lot down, who have now apparently vanished from the business world.

 

Complaint to FOS as company were not replying to letters sent to them, the FOS were dealing with apparently hundreds of complaints re these characters.

 

The FOS advised to contact Barclays and request an immediate chargeback from them, Barclays of course refused point blank over the phone so letter of complaint sent to Barclays who investigated and sent some forms out to us.

 

The FCA apparently have strict instructions/regulations as the Banks are obliged to apply to customers written requests for immediate charge backs, for this type of mal practice by companies such as The1loan or whatever they call themselves now.

 

Contacted Barclays Chargeback Analysts at DCSA Customer Care enquiring as to why they had not responded to my letter/forms I had sent and when they were going to Chargback my monies taken by The1loan.

 

Surprise surprise they agreed over the phone to apply an "immediate chargeback" and a little bit more for the inconvenience of having to wait etc.

 

I have dealt with Barclays previously about chargebacks and they do not seem to have a constant consistent reply/procedure, even after having conversations with managers, they love to send countless numbers of time consuming paper/forms to fill in and send them to another dept hoping you will give up the chase. I find dealing with them to be frustrating and I am convinced that it is a ploy of the Bank. On previous occasions they have applied an immediate chargeback over the phone and then some days/weeks later they take it back from your account and it starts over again. Calling them dysfunctional is not strong enough a term.

 

All comments will as usual be greatly appreciated.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

By telling you to fill in forms like that, barclays are already in violation of guidance/regulation. They can chargeback immediately then investigate, they should not make you fill in a form first, then investigate.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

renegadeimp,

 

I have had mixed reactions from Barclays staff re chargebacks on many occasions, they are either ignorant of the regs or they are deliberately being told to be

obstructive. There does not appear to be a standard retort from them re the chargeback procedure, some have been spot on others are a total shamble, upon asking Barclays staff for their names and ID etc when making complaint re chargebacks, they have become obstructive and are very reluctant to offer up their names etc. they definately have a policy for obstruction in making the chargebacks. They (IMHO) are shambolic in their Customer Service.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take it out of the front desk monkeys hands and go higher up the chain. The law regarding chargebacks is on your side. Barclays think the rules do not apply to them. Look at the mess they helped create a few years ago and the world still hasnt recovered yet.,

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You also need to get the FOS involved. Do everything you can to cover your back. You could even quote FCA information direct to them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hello All,

 

 

SUCCESS AT LAST!!

Letter received from Barclays.

 

 

Case Ref : **** ** AUGUST 2014

Tel No 0345 945 4545

Overseas: 0044 1928 584421

Fax number 01604 25 4474

Text Phone: 02476 53 4973

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Mrs*****

 

 

About your Disputed Transaction

Sort Code / Account No **************

 

 

Debit CARD Ending: ****

 

 

With reference to your dispute with WWW. THE1LOAN. CO UK for the amount of 58.99 GBP. We have completed our investigations and can confirm that your Account has been refunded in settlement of your dispute.

 

 

We hope that our response resolves your dispute and we will now make arrangements to close this case.

 

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

Your Barclays Team.

 

 

This Letter is the result of constant contacts with their Debit Card Operations Team, who do not seem to, or want to understand customers genuine complaints, regarding a despicable company of National notoriety and shady dealings. Barclays DCO team do not seem to know what other colleagues are doing, as one would authorise and give chargeback, only for it to be re debited, to some other commercial bank, who also were claiming monies from me re THE!LOANCOMPANY. The FOS were also involved and Barclays were informed in writing by them, that they had to make a chargeback.

All in all it was a pretty SHAMBOLIC effort from BARCLAYS. and it took fom May to December to resolve and chargeback my 58.99GBP.

 

 

"TAKE NOTE BARCLAYS"

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

AKA, BY EXAMPLE WE LEAD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done! Keep hold of that letter just incase they try anything to get it back :)

 

However, i would still inform the FCA and FOS. The amount of time you were denied your money is inexcusable.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

jgj

as rene says, as seen in similar threads re these pie brokers trading as each others cousin company. some of them have their fingers in other such fee requiring services eg dvla licence renewal eg #13 here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?437190-Driving-Licence-Support.-website-spoofed-me-help.

the bankers always give a fuss, but end up paying, mostly.

from jan, these brokers will need express written authority to take such fees. bye bye loan brokers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...