Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Friends. I cannot believe it but im being evicted again, i was given a section 48 notice 4 months into my tenancy. I already went through this process last year, i overstayed in my last place by a few months and left on 6th Oct 2023. I knew to check all the documentation that they sent to see if the notice is legal, it looks like it is. I took this place out of desperation as i had to vacate that last place. I hate this place so im not bothered about leaving it.    These cowboys lied to me when i viewed the house. I told the agent that i was evicted from my last house and naturally i dont want this to happen again. She said  the landlord has no plans to sell the house. What she did not tell me was that the landlord had tried to sell the house last year and failed. So it looks like they have used me to fill in the short period of time until its time to sell again. I did see it advertised online.   I told them im not in a strong enough financial position to find another property, cost of a deposit, 1 months rent and moving costs.   They have told me they are starting legal proceedings. They have sent me an invoice for £395 but i have not even received the court paperwork.    I dont like the job im in so i have decided to relocate to a better job and hopefully find cheaper rentals.   I can post a copy of the notice if needed.  
    • yes a judgement sorry I used the wrong word before
    • Hi So on Friday I received a copy on email from the claimants solicitors with an attached relief from sanctions application - on the basis that the solicitor missed the deadline for the additional directions and it was an oversight on their part and that the claimant should therefore not suffer.   They then attached a copy of the deed of assignment and a new witness statement.  They stated that they would be happy to delay the court date by 28 days but that they believed both parties were ready for the court case on 7th June. My first question, is there anything I need to do or do I just sit and wait to see what is decided?  Secondly, is it likely the judge will be aware that the claimants solicitors did exactly the same in the set aside court case (ie they filed their court bundle late and applied for relief from sanctions on the morning of the court date, and my solicitors had no choice but to agree because they threatened to strike my case out because my solicitors had only filed their court bundle by email and not post).  This is a clear pattern of how these solicitors work rather than it being a one off oversight! 
    • I shall find the link later this evening. It was about couples not living together but being liable for council tax. I was never married or in an official civil partnership. We lived together for 18 months, I then left for 6 months for work but continued to pay my half of the bills and rent.   We then split up I gave up my tenancy she took it all in her name. She then decided to move in with me 5 months later. She then banned me from going back to my house eventually let me back in then called the police. Took over my house and is now only paying the rent not the bills so I will be landed with those to. So over the course of our relationship I have ended up paying her debts for 5 different addresses, personal loans and credit cards. If I refuse to pay them she makes more accusations.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can someone help please?


shanew49
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3677 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can someone help please?

 

I am going to receive a settlement agreement from work of £7700.

 

I am currently receiving £200 every 2 weeks in ESA,

 

I owe my dad £5000, will the benefits office still take the £5000 into account?

 

I know I am allowed to have £6000 in savings, so will they base any deductions on the figure of £2700?

 

I thought I read somewhere that they deduct £1 for every £500 over £6000?

 

is this correct?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you get contribution based ESA? or income-related ESA ?

 

 

in-come Related ESA will be reduced by £1 per week for every £250 (or part £250) you have over £6000

 

you might be best informing the DWP of this and about the debt your going to be paying back to your dad in case it causes any problems for you in the future

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your response, so I'm looking at maximum deductions of £5-10? could it cause more problems than its worth explaining about giving my dad the £5000 I owe, I mean obviously I am going to inform them that I have received a settlement agreement and the total figure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your response, so I'm looking at maximum deductions of £5-10? could it cause more problems than its worth explaining about giving my dad the £5000 I owe, I mean obviously I am going to inform them that I have received a settlement agreement and the total figure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The concept here is called "Deprivation of capital", basically defined as needlessly spending or otherwise disposing of money in order to increase benefit entitlement. There's no definition in law of what is or isn't needless - each case is looked at individually by a DWP Decision Maker.

 

Now, paying debts that are due would not normally be seen as deprivation, whereas paying off debts early sometimes can be. So there are two possible outcomes.

 

1) They will treat you as having the full £7700. If they do this, they will ignore the first £6000 and make deductions from your benefits on the rest. The deduction is £1 per week for each £250 or part thereof. So that would be £1700 in capital, leading to a £7 per week deduction.

 

2) They will accept your reasons for disposing of the £5000, in which case you will have only £2700 left and there will be no deduction from your benefits at all.

 

There's no real reason not to inform them of where the money went - since the debt is to a family member it seems somewhat likely to me that they'll accept that and not make any deduction. In the end, you have nothing to lose by trying. If your Dad is willing to write a letter confirming that you owe him the money, so much the better.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A letter would be best if possible. It's not always possible to speak to Decision Makers directly about these sorts of things.

 

But they are supposed to believe you unless they have some specific reason to doubt your word. It's hard to say how any given DM will view the situation, though.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of me thinks to save any hassle, maybe just take the £28 hit per month, I know I'm telling the truth tho. do I have to inform them when I spend any of the £1700? I mean so they can recalculate what I should be receiving? this all seems a bit petty doesn't it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...