Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Carter/lowells - Claim form shop direct catalogue debt***Claim Discontinued***


liamuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Re: (Lowell Portfolio 1 ltd ) v ************ Case No: ****************CPR 31.14 RequestOn the ***February 2014 I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the Northampton county court.I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest your claim. Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request has not been fulfilled as yet and was sent to both Lowell portfolio and Bryan carter.Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:1: the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.2: the assignment3: the default notice4: the termination notice5: statement of accountAlthough your claim is for a sum which is not more than £10,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise. You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order. I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

Edited by liamuk
Trying to put into paragraphs???
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry a bit confused now - so are you saying a copy of the orignal aggreement would not be engouth - as they never mentioned on the claim form?The below is also what I was thinking of sending......

 

Yes they have referred to an agreement within their particulars....but the problem we face with cat debts is that you probably never signed one and in most cases your first purchase and payment acts as an acknowledgment of the agreement.

 

By all means request a copy but not by way of the CPR 31.14 but by using a section 78 request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So i had sent requests for the copy of aggreements - i think the account was opened around 2004.Do i ask for any other documents if not CPR 31.14? i remeber when I first fell behind SD and then Lowells were not helpful so I dug my head in the sand.What also worries me is how much I have probably been stung for charges etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes use the CPR 31.14 for anything else referred...but its not as powerful as a section 77/78 request...if they dont have to respond to a CPR 31 request they must to a section 77/78 request or they will be in default when you submit a defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they can put it on hold and not continue the court process until the CCA is produced.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still watch the deadlines though and remind Carters if the documents do not arrive. It wouldn't be the first case where something arrives at the last minute and they go for a default judgment!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they have referred to an agreement within their particulars....but the problem we face with cat debts is that you probably never signed one and in most cases your first purchase and payment acts as an acknowledgment of the agreement.

 

By all means request a copy but not by way of the CPR 31.14 but by using a section 78 request.

 

Andy

As this is from 2002 surely they need to provide a signed agreement or show that on balance an agreement was signed. I know this needs an affirmative defence and for the OP to have some idea of how they actually opened the account but with catalogues I would have thought it is much easier to show nothing was signed as they do not have processes in place

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still watch the deadlines though and remind Carters if the documents do not arrive. It wouldn't be the first case where something arrives at the last minute and they go for a default judgment!

 

Yess i will keep a eye on deadlines and come back when I hear. Have been reading through a lot of the tactics BC and co get upto.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy

As this is from 2002 surely they need to provide a signed agreement or show that on balance an agreement was signed. I know this needs an affirmative defence and for the OP to have some idea of how they actually opened the account but with catalogues I would have thought it is much easier to show nothing was signed as they do not have processes in place

 

This account was opened in 2005.

 

What I do know is I opened via there website. At one stage I had different accounts with there different brands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah 2005. The issue there is that digital signatures became valid in 2005 so if they can show that you would have had to seen all the PT's at the time of signing and they they sent you T&C's you may be in trouble however making them prove it all may be beneficial

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah 2005. The issue there is that digital signatures became valid in 2005 so if they can show that you would have had to seen all the PT's at the time of signing and they they sent you T&C's you may be in trouble however making them prove it all may be beneficial

 

Thanks - I would imagine on which month this became effective. Also maybe the best I can expect is to contest charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question guy's - if tyhe date on the claim is 21/2 when would you recomened I get my defence in by? Also assuming BC and co send me the information required?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guy's had a reply from BC....really strange one as looking around never seen anyone else hae a reply like this...

 

'we can confirm the cliam was issued as per protocol etc'

'the claim will most probably be allocated to the small claims track as its a simple contract matter'

'in the event the default notice and assigment left the claimant when it was sent to me and its upto you to find'

'its the origanal creditors policy to issue agreements at the start with your statements and its up to you to refer to your records'

'we are not agreeable to a extension for filing your defence'

 

they also say that i am requesting disclourse under part 31 (thought it was part 31.14).

 

I have done something wrong????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe you've read the wrong threads. This whitewash is in fact the standard Carter template reply.

 

yes seen some coments but not these...

 

'we are not agreeable to a extension for filing your defence'

 

they also say that i am requesting disclourse under part 31 (thought it was part 31.14).

 

so wonder what my next step is and if they can object to me putting a defence in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what I have done so far is..

 

cca request to BC (who replied and said they have passed to Lowells)

cca request to Lowells - no reply to date

sar request to origanl creditor - no reply to date

request of part 31.14 sent o BC - response as post 42

 

what do I do next? Do I wait and get my defence ready?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have been contemplating your defence the day the claim arrived...a defence is not based on documents you have requested and they have not complied with.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Any updates on this thread? Very similar to my situation I am currently fighting two claims at the same time, my defence is quite simple, first claim is the debt is not on my credit file and have no idea what it is (apart from their reference number which is credit card type), the second claim (I think) is for a credit card that was opened in 2010 for £200 limit but is now around £370, all charges I think!!

 

 

I have sent CCA to DCA and CPR 31.14 to BC and had same reply from BC as post 42.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any updates on this thread? Very similar to my situation I am currently fighting two claims at the same time, my defence is quite simple, first claim is the debt is not on my credit file and have no idea what it is (apart from their reference number which is credit card type), the second claim (I think) is for a credit card that was opened in 2010 for £200 limit but is now around £370, all charges I think!!

 

 

I have sent CCA to DCA and CPR 31.14 to BC and had same reply from BC as post 42.

 

you need to start your own threads please

 

start a new thread

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...