Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claim form from lowells under old name for LLoyds debt [changedname by deedpoll]


sillychild
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3776 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Default Terrible Teen Debt

Hi Guys,

 

Need some help and guidance,

 

I will be the first to admit I was stupid for doing this but I got involved with a bad circle of friends

and ran up some debt with loans and credit cards.

I buried my head in the sand and decided to stop paying these off.

 

It all got a bit too much so I decided the best way out would be to start fresh

and change my name which I did successfully via deedpol.

 

I have recently received a CCJ on my old name for this debt

it's been a long time since I stopped paying this off.

 

I do not have a clue who I owe this money to it has been that long.

I can no longer access my credit file for my old name as I don't have any ID what so ever to verift this.

 

I am aware of the statute barred rule and I am sure it has been longer than 6 years

since I stopped responding and acknowledging this debt but inhale no way of checking.

 

The pursuers are a well known collections agency in Yorkshire

and looking into their reports on various forums s have a habit of chasing post 6 year debts.

 

Any help or guidance would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a letter with 3 reply methods acknowledgment

or disputing the claim from these guys.

 

The letter has been sent under my old alias which has not existed for nearly 3years now.

 

However I don't know if there have been any previous CCJ to my old alias

and need to check if it might be stature barred

but can't as I do not have any verifying documents

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks.

 

It is a claim form you have received so I have moved your thread to the Legal forum where the guys will be along to help as soon as they are available.

 

In the meantime can you tell us the issue date on the claim form (top right hand corner).

 

Also can you type up the Particulars of Claim exactly as they appear on the front of the form but minus anything which may identify you.

 

As you mention "pursuers", are you in Scotland by any chance?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.. I am living in England not Scotland.

 

Details of the letter

Particulars of claim

The Claimant claim for the sum of XXX being monies due from the defendant

to the claimant under a store/credit act regulated by the consumer credit act 1974

between the defendant and a bank (remember this)

 

Under the account reference xxxxx and assigned to the claimant on 30/06/2013

notice of which has been given to the defendant

(I don't recall receiving mail all has gone back quoting return to sender)

 

the defendant failed to maintain the contractual payment under the terms of the agreement

and a default notice has been served

and not complied with (again not seen any of this as all mail is returned to sender)

 

The claim also includes statutory interest etc

 

The letter issues date was the 7th Feb

that's the just of then letter and

 

I have a few methods of replying to this.

 

To highlight though the claim is under my old name not my new alias

and I'm pretty sure I stopped paying this in 2009ish

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roughly when did you take out this account ?

 

Roughly when did you stop paying ?

 

Are you bothered about any CCJ ?

 

Do you want to start paying this debt if it correctly due for enforcement and is not statute barred ?

 

How many other debts are in the pipeline of being chased ? Do you know the approximate value of your overall debts ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much are Lowell Claiming?

Do you remember a store or credit card if so who was the issuer?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roughly when did you take out this account ? The account was taken out in 2006/7

 

Roughly when did you stop paying ? Stopped paying in 2008/2009 stopped paying

 

Are you bothered about any CCJ ? CCJ is not affecting my new alias as I changed this on 2011 and already have the ability to take our credit I know because I use a CC for work

 

Do you want to start paying this debt if it correctly due for enforcement and is not statute barredicon ? Not if I don't have to as its not directly affecting me I completely forgot about it tbh

 

How many other debts are in the pipeline of being chased ? Do you know the approximate value of your overall debts ? I think there might be 2 more that I know of over 10k

 

Lowell are claiming £2000 the original debt was with Lloyd's

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the court claim form is not in your new name,

I am not sure how you would defend it.

 

I suppose just because you changed your name by deedpol

does not mean that they could not enforce the debt against you.

 

You are still responsible for the debts and they will enforce them.

 

When you change your name by deedpol,

there will be some records of this, which will be picked up by creditors.

 

When you apply for any form of credit there are questions about whether

you have been known by other names and also for your address history.

 

 

If you gave false information on any new credit application,

this could be considered fraud.

 

I think you are digging a big hole for yourself by messing around changing your name

and will need to obtain proper legal advice.

 

If you have debts that are still enforceable of over £10k,

I think you need to consider applying for some form of debt relief.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite simply changing ones name by deed poll cannot be used to avoid obligations accrued by the original persona, to do this maybe an offence.

 

 

The way to respond is "New Name Also Known As"

 

 

The name change is no defence.

 

 

You are playing with fire!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so acknowledged I have been a bit silly here my next steps

 

Who can I contact for some legal advice on how to put all this to bed?

 

I am guessing there is no way of checking that this debt is not Statue Barred

as I have no way of accessing my credit report for the old alias?

 

Is there any way I can contact the creditor for this particular debt and settling out of court?

 

Any help would be much appreciated

 

granted I have been a total numpty in my younger years which is coming back to haunt me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citizens Advice may b able to help.

You may have to write to the data controllers of 2 of the main CRAs explaining the deed poll and providing evidence of it to get a " statutory" credit report, the fee is £2.00.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can defend it using your previous name.. your previous name is still legally valid and is still connected to your name by deed poll.You can search your Credit Reference files under either name as they should be linked.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres no harm in you sending lowells a CCA request

 

and a CpR 31:14.

 

you know the original creditor

so you can also SAR them

giving details of your old address and name at the time you took it out

 

you will NEED to include a copy of your deedpoll cert

and a copy of a current util bill

pref CTAX, where you are named to ID your self.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...