Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

robinson way and santander bank charges debt help needed


dazzaman12
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3617 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

two threads merged

 

please keep to one thread per debt

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember that letters from Robinson Way are hot air, they are acting on behalf of Santander and can do NOTHING to you. You have a plan now thanks to DX and Brig, make sure you stick to it and if you want to deviate come back here for advice FIRST

 

Stay off the phone as well

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

hi everyone ,

 

I thought I was rid of robinson way after sending statute barred letter but

 

I have received a letter today saying that I have made an alleged payment in 2009 for £5

and it is not statute barred and I need to pay the full amount.

 

I have checked my credit file and this debt is no longer on file it has dropped off,

are robinson way trying it on because I have never made a payment at all to Santander or robinson.

 

any advice would be appreciated and thankyou everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you put them to strict proof

 

of when, where, how, by whom.

 

phantom payments are a typical DCA trick.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you put them to strict proof

 

of when, where, how, by whom.

 

phantom payments are a typical DCA trick

 

 

 

dx

 

 

Hi dx thankyou for the reply.

I sent them the template letter only

After the six year date which was in march

I waited until it was no longer on credit file before sending it.

Do i need to send proof and if so what proof can i send.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 31

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you put them to strict proof

 

of when, where, how, by whom.

 

the payment were made

 

by a formal letter

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you put them to strict proof

 

of when, where, how, by whom.

 

the payment were made

 

by a formal letter

 

dx

 

ok thankyou,i will post there response when i get .

thanks again for all your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

not being on your cra file is no indication a debt is not owed

 

good pointer esp if payments have not been made in 6yrs

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is the letter I will be sending to them, I have just added a bit to the statute barred letter template .

is there anything I need to add

 

 

Robinson Way

 

Quays Reach

 

Carolina Way

 

Salford

 

M50 2ZY

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Reference No: xxxxxxxxx

 

Your company has contacted me in respect of the above account which you claim is owed by myself stating

I have made an alleged payment in 2009.

 

I have no acknowledgment of this payment and you have not provided me with a copy of the alledged payment.

 

I am requesting a copy of this alleged payment I am supposed to have made as you stated in February 2009

and as I have stated I have no acknoweldment of any such payment

and again would like to advise you that the account is statute barred.

 

It is my understanding that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5

 

"an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued".

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that

 

"it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period".

 

The last payment or acknowledgement of this debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment

has been made since that time.

 

Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me/us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act,

 

I/we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me/us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that

 

"continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970".

 

You have also stated that a door-step collection could be sanctioned in regards to this alleged debt, Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing or email. Should it be your intention to arrange a doorstep visit, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make such an appointment with you.

 

There is an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and, if you do so, you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

I await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

to much waffle you've already sent

 

 

Robinson Way

 

Quays Reach

 

Carolina Way

 

Salford

 

M50 2ZY

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Reference No: xxxxxxxxx

 

I acknowledge no debt to you or your clients.

 

i thank you for your letter dated ...............

 

Your company has contacted me in respect of the above account which you claim is owed by myself

stating I have made an alleged payment in 2009.

 

no such payment by myself has ever been made

 

please supply the following details regarding these alleged payments

you claim I have made

 

the method of payment

where the payment was made

by whom the payment was made

the details of the account the payments were made from.

 

I repeat I do not acknowledge any debt to you or your client

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that dx , I have sent your template letter to them and awaiting reply

 

 

the letter they sent me says as follows

 

 

dear xxxx

 

 

further to your recent query , our client advises that the last payment received for this account was £5.00 in February 2009.

the account is therefore not statute barred.

please complete the enclosed financial statement and return with your affordable proposal for payment within the next 14 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi all , received a letter today from robinson way and it states

 

 

dear mr xxxxxx

 

 

we refer to the above account which will no longer be managed by this office

all future payments and correspondence should be sent to our client directly, if you were paying us by standing order please cancel that instruction

thankyou for your cooperation

 

 

does this mean that's the end of it or will I be pestered some more later down the line

 

 

I would just like to thank everyone for all the help I have been receiving on here ,you are all great!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all , received a letter today from robinson way and it states

 

 

dear mr xxxxxx

 

 

we refer to the above account which will no longer be managed by this office

all future payments and correspondence should be sent to our client directly, if you were paying us by standing order please cancel that instruction

thankyou for your cooperation

 

 

does this mean that's the end of it or will I be pestered some more later down the line

 

 

I would just like to thank everyone for all the help I have been receiving on here ,you are all great!!!!!!

 

 

 

It's a result But all depends on what Satan's Bank decides to do either close their file and writ the debt off and do no more or sell the debt to a DCA lower down the food chain in the murky depth of the DCA pond.

 

 

You need to regularly check your credit reference files for changes.

 

 

Vigilance is need as none of these companies are trustworthy.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

with it been six years and three month old they may leave it be now.

fingers crossed

 

 

still nothing showing on credit report either

1

 

 

Just be vigilant Satan's can be devious.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...