Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all! I've now had a "final notification letter" through from ECP. I assume I should continue to ignore this, but is there likely any action I need to take? Do you need to see a copy of the letter? Thanks
    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help please - court claim 1st Stop PayDay ***Claim Discontinued***


chrismk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I've been struggling financially for nearly two years, in desperation to pay a bill I took out a payday loan with 1st Stop back in June last year. My wife then had her hours cut and I couldn't pay it back.

 

I tried to contact them in writing to offer a repayment plan, all I got back was threatening letters and demands for increased payments, charges added and more interest applied.

 

To check if the amounts they were saying was outstanding I sent off for a copy of my agreement and a statement of account, this never arrived and still hasn't. My requests were ignored and the threatening emails and texts continued.

 

I finally out of frustration called them last week to advise I had requested this information and that the amount they stated was outstanding was in dispute, I also again put this in writing and posted it in the 27th January this year.

 

Today I received a court claim form issued on the 30th January, I don't deny I owe some of the money but not sure what I should do.

 

Any advice or help gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all to follow on from the above,

 

Particulars of claim read:

 

1st stop payday loans ltd agreed to lend the defendant 225.00 on 7th June 2013. The defendant agreed to pay the short term loan back after 30 days. The defendant has failed to meet repayment of the loan despite many attempts to resolve this.

 

The amount claimed is £659.39 + £60 court fee

 

I have written to them numerous times and there is currently a CCA request outstanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have proof? Do you have funds to pay the debt? It looks like theyve levied interest after termination of the contract as well purely as a profit making exercise.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you have the £225?

 

The CCA request is really futile now, as you would have ticked the box when applying for the loan. Should they turn up in Court, even these numpties will probably have the CCA.

 

I have moved the thread to legal for you.

 

You need to acknowledge the claim, this will give you extra time to prepare a defence. This will be based on not owing the amount claimed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will you be defending the claim in full? If not, unless you can pay the full amount within 28 days of judgement, youll get a CCJ against you. You really need all communication you sent to the PDL, so you can show the courts they are trying to use the court as a form of debt collection.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all and thanks for the replies and help so far, in answer to your questions I'll post a brief timeline below.

 

£225 borrowed June 2013, repayment due 30 days later, couldn't make the payment, letters wrote explaining my situation and asking for a repayment plan and help. Letters ignored.

 

30th July 2013, received a letter saying I was ignoring them and that interest and late fees had been applied.

I again write asking for a payment plan letters ignored.

 

29th August I receive a default notice, again with more interest added etc

Again I write and no response

 

On the 11th September after I realise I no longer have a copy of the agreement I send a CCA request. I wanted the agreement to check what was actually outstanding and what they could and couldn't charge me. They did not respond and still haven't, the CCA request was sent Royal Mail Signed For, I have proof of posting and proof of signature at delivery.

 

As they did not respond I sent an account in dispute letter and have since ignored the constant telephone calls, texts, emails etc.

 

On the 25th January this year I received a final offer before issue letter dated 22nd January giving me 7 days to pay £584.39.

 

I write back on the 27th advising account in dispute and on the 30th January they issue the claim

 

I have copies of all letters sent but only proof of posting for the CCA request.

 

I'm not sure how to proceed?

 

I'm not sure if I can pay in full as I don't know how much I'm exactly liable for as I don't have the agreement,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the letter from this site with a £1 postal order.

 

I'm not sure what you mean adapt it to see if you can show how the figure is made up? If a CCA request isn't complied with does that not forbid a creditor from adding interest and charges etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I have tonight completed the Acknowledgement Of Service online and indicated I intend to defend all of this claim.

Based on the fact the amount claimed is wrong.

 

Any further advice on how to proceed now gratefully received

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Can anyone offer any assistance please, I have acknowledged service on the 5th February but not sure where to start reference a defence.

 

Thank you

 

Hi all

 

Can someone please confirm when I need to submit my defence by. Issue date was the 30th January and I acknowledged service on the 5th February.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have 33 days from the 30/01/14 to submit a defence.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it forms part of your defence...in fact the main thrust of it.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite easy..... take a look around at others threads most contain a defence that I have drafted.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI All,

 

I have started preparing my defence, I'm not sure if it should be in any particular order but all help comments and suggestions appreciated.

 

Defendant claims that this claim is unlawful and vexatious. The Claimant has failed to comply with a lawful request for a true copy of the agreement. This request was made and sent on 11th September 2013 via Royal Mail Signed For post. The Claimant signed for receipt on 12th September 2013, to date no response has been received.

 

Section 78 (6) of the CCA 1974 States:

If the creditor fails to comply

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Defendant agrees that 1st stop payday loans ltd agreed to lend £225 on 7th June 2013. Defendant disputes the amount claimed, it is contended that only one months interest is due, any claim to further interest is denied.

 

Defendant denies the claimants claim that no attempts to resolve the matter have been made, numerous letters have been ignored by the claimant including a CCA request as mentioned above.

 

 

Thats what I have so far, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do you get that months interest from? because if it goes to a hearing, the judge will ask the same question.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the reply, one months interest is based on the fact that it was a 30 day agreement. Though because I don't have a copy of the agreement I'm not sure exactly what is contractually payable.

 

Is it best not to make that statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum and thread title edited.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not ideal chrismk...it must be CPR compliant or the curt could reject it from the off.

 

Start here with the Particulars and number it as so:-

 

Particulars of claim read:

 

1.1st stop payday loans ltd agreed to lend the defendant 225.00 on 7th June 2013.

2.The defendant agreed to pay the short term loan back after 30 days.

3.The defendant has failed to meet repayment of the loan despite many attempts to resolve this.

 

4.The amount claimed is £659.39 + £60 court fee

 

Now start your defence.....

 

1. It is accepted that I did approach the Claimant with view to borrowing a short term loan.It was my understanding.........etc etc

2. It is accepted that repayment was to be made by xx xxx xxxxx unfortunately....etc etc

3. It is denied that I have failed to meet the repayment terms and condition It is denied that the claimant has made many attempts to resolve this....etc etc.

4. It is denied that I am in debt to the value claimed and the claimant is put to strict proof to:-

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for.

© show how the breach occurred and how they attempted any resolution.

 

5. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

Edit to suit by completing the ..etc by adding your words as to why you feel you do not owe the amount claimed.

The above is purely an example of the format and content that is expected to be submitted and compliant with the CPR.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...