Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Whatever the nuances of the law, they will be lost on OPS, who like the rest of the PPcs never bother to get planning permission, ever. When they get a new contract they don't want to delay issuing PCNs by deigning to follow the law, especially as the period when they take over and the parking restrictions are new is the time when they can catch most drivers out.
    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Queen G vs MBNA


QueenG
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6388 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Until last month I was completely unaware that penalty banks charges are unlawful. I'm a new Mum, and read about several success stories on websites such as NetMum and Mumsnet.

 

I haven't been the most organised person in the past, so have incurred charges. Now I am trying to straighten out my finances and clear some debt, the banks have certainly taken enough money from me over the years, so I think it's time they gave some back.

 

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letters was sent to MBNA on the 10th October 2006. I have received confirmation of receiving letter detailing that requested information will follow soon.

 

This is a great website and I really appreciate having access to this information for free. Thanks to all those who put it together, keep it up to date and those who respond with help and advice.

 

Good luck to you all.

quote.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Today I received a letter responding to my S.A.R letter. The letter was dated 2nd November offering a goodwill gesture of £160. I heven't worked out all charges accurately yet, but my guess is they amount to approx £300

______________________________________________________________________

Summary of letter:

Charges are clearly set out in T&Cs. Costs incurred for late payment fees are substancial. It is unauthorised borrowing if over credit limit. Set charges reflect the costs of dealing with defaults for all custmers and are upfront about why and when will be applied, so are valid fair and enforceable.

 

We have enclosed statement info detailing charges. As have not treated as full sar request, have returned cheque and will not charge on this occassion. Form enclosed to submit if wish to obtain full SAR. Valued customer - so have credited account with £160 goodwill payment.

 

MBNA disagrees with OFT interpretation of law and maintains charges were always legal and fair but have reduced fees to £12. Must honour revised terms or will cancel card and agreement.

 

If no further communication within next eight weeks, MBNA will assume matter is closed.

_______________________________________________________________________

 

 

So, one stamp was worth £160. Not bad so far :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

well at least they have contacted you lol they cashed my cheque last week wrote to tell me that they are looking into my complaint and ive heard nothing since!!!

good luck

klare

just hoping isnt enough ASK!

 

CO OP £170 charges

09/08/06 first letter sent recorded

12/08/06 first letter acknowledged

24/08/06 LBA letter sent recorded

02/08/06 acknowledged please wait a further 6 wks for reply

14/09/06 MCO filed

20/09/06 charges refunded!!!!

23/10/06 request for statements mbna offer £140.00 prem letter sent

23/10/06 first letter sent hsbc (2 accounts) £2900 approx) LBA sent

23/10/06 LBA A&L claiming back £186.50 first letter ignored) MCOL filed 25/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine that you will receive a similar letter very soon, as I also received an acknowledgement letter about one week ago. I'm going to send an LBA for SAR as they have not sent me the data I asked for. The goodwill gesture was nice of them. I won't treat it as a bribe, so I will continue toclaim a full refund of all charges.:)

 

I am also reserarching how to approach for interest and contractual interest.

 

Good luck with your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received an acknowledgement letter from the MBNA, less than a week after sending my SAR. They said they are looking into the complaint and would be back in contact before the 27th November. I think they are trying to stop people before they start by offering money - although nowhere near enough to cover their fees!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...