Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cure Solutions /fake court papers? - Creditors Bankruptcy petition


pinkcob
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3870 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a

- creditors bankruptcy petition on failure to comply with a statutory demand

for a liquidated sum payable immediately - rule 6.6 on a form 6.7

 

Questions

- the debt they are claiming is £369.66

- I didn't know they could make you bankrupt under £750.

 

- I have only had one other letter from them which states

- as you may be aware, our client legally took an assignment of this outstanding debt

for the avoidance of doubt, we hereby enclose herewith notice of assignment confirming the assignment to our client.

But nothing was enclosed in the letter.

 

I don't understand - it's got a court date of 15 nov.

 

One can they do this?

I have offered installments but was rejected.

Two won't it cost them loads to make me bankrupt and can they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Phone the court on Monday morning to find out why they have allowed a bankruptcy petition for less than the £750 threshold and then post back. Perhaps there has been an error. Ask the court as to whether the claimant has paid the court all relevant fees.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not lowells, aktiv kapital or carter is it?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a - creditors bankruptcy petition on failure to comply with a statutory demand for a liquidated sum payable immediately - rule 6.6 on a form 6.7

Questions - the debt they are claiming is £369.66 - I didn't know they could make you bankrupt under £750.

- I have only had one other letter from them which states - as you may be aware, our client legally took an assignment of this outstanding debt for the avoidance of doubt, we hereby enclose herewith notice of assignment confirming the assignment to our client. But nothing was enclosed in the letter.

I don't understand - it's got a court date of 15 nov.

One can they do this? I have offered installments but was rejected. Two won't it cost them loads to make me bankrupt and can they?

 

The court will regard an individual as being unable to pay their debts if either of the following occurs:

 

A creditor who is owed more than £750 serves a 'statutory demand' for the money due

and it is not paid or secured (for example, by a guarantee to provide something else of the same value);

 

or a settlement is not agreed, within 21 days, and the debtor has not applied for the statutory demand to be set aside.

 

Did you not apply to have the SD set aside?

 

Can you post up the petition minus all personal details, reference numbers, bar codes etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this for a business debt? Has there been any previous CCJ for this debt ?

 

Were you personally served with a bankruptcy petition ? Normally the petition would have to be served on you personally and they cannot post it to you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st letter then had court document - question is can they?

 

Image too small to read.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was posted recorded - postman signed as wasn't in

 

I don't think these people know what they are doing. I would phone the court on Monday to find out what is going on, as I suggested earlier.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically they can't for under £750 - someone suggested it was smoke n mirrors to try and get ASAP. I will phone court Monday ty

 

They are clearly trying it on and taking unfair advantage of you being an untrained litigant act in person. (no offence or disrespect intended towards you my dear fellow Cag member.

 

Disregard the statutory demand, because, as has rightly been pointed out here by others, the threshold for the issuance of bankruptcy proceedings against you is £750.00.

 

Can you please provide us with some further info, such as is this matter regulated under the CCA 1974 (as amended)? Have you received a valid statutory default notice from the creditor? Do you recognise this debt and what is it for? Have you received any letters from the creditor or any DCA's prior to the service of this (clearly) invalid statutory demand.

 

 

Further, do not attempt to speak with your creditor or any DCA instructed by him on this matter over the telephone!, this is a GOLDEN RULE and you must keep all correspondence in writing, your letters on this matter must be sent by recorded or special delivery. Make a file for this matter and keep all correspondence received from creditor or his DCA, including all envelopes in this file.

 

Don't panic, you cannot be made bankrupt for £369.66 and the creditor cannot issue proceedings to bankrupt you for the same.

 

Come back and please answer the questions above, do not post any of your personal info on this matter.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

- I don't understand this bit

- 'Can you please provide us with some further info,

such as is this matter regulated under the CCA 1974 (as amended)?

 

Have you received a valid statutory default notice from the creditor?

 

Do you recognise this debt and what is it for?

 

Have you received any letters from the creditor or any DCA's prior to the service of this (clearly) invalid statutory demand.'

 

I can find no mention or reference to CCA 1974 any where on any documents

- I don't believe I have had a prior valid notice just a company letter.

 

Yes I recognise debt which is actually £169.99 but the first letter is requesting £369.99?

& in court paper it says £369.676 and that additional costs of £275 have been added for fees n court costs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Woodland and Cure Solutions I believe have been up to this nonsense before this should be reported to the Insolvency Service

as it is a major abuse pf process.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

My debt is £169

yet first letter demanded £369.99 with no explanation why £200 hike

- there is no reference to CCA 1974 on either letter nor court document

- it says on court document £275 has been added for court costs etc

so the sums don't even add up

 

as regards the rest of you're question ,

 

I don't really understand

 

'Can you please provide us with some further info,

such as is this matter regulated under the CCA 1974 (as amended)?

Have you received a valid statutory default notice from the creditor?

Do you recognise this debt and what is it for?

Have you received any letters from the creditor or any DCA's prior to the service of this (clearly) invalid statutory demand.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...