Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK thanks, I noted them down when I checked the report - 3 have already expired, although if I'm adding the 14 days on then it'll be another week or so for those. The others are; end of July (so into August is that right?), end of August (these two are the big ones) and a couple of grand on Shop Direct at the end of November but seeing as this furthest one is Lowell and they have already missed those first 3 then I feel pretty safe with that one. Are these DN dates on the credit report that dates I should be looking at +14 days when their anniversaries come up this year as the time when I can be sure the debts are SB?  I won't be rushing to send the SB letters anyway until the final one has passed and I can just do them in one fell swoop.
    • pdf's merged and properly named. thread title updated. word fine replaced by charge in post one....they are not fines mere speculative invoices. just type no need to keep hitting quote.   dx  
    • Nice work dx, much what I thought and glad to have it confirmed by the expert. Radio silence remains my game plan, I have been resident in Scotland since birth and although I had moved a couple of years prior to defaulting, all addresses were updated and I am confident all begging letters are coming to my current home address. I appreciate the info that they probably wouldn't get a claim in by Aug anyway - I think I'll hunt out my big box of badness in the next few days just to see if I can find any default notice letters so I can pin down some dates to satisfy my semi-OCD. Much obliged, and unlike some others i will look to update in the future as I certainly intend to send them the SB letter as I like to pull the chains of these types of cretins! Of course i'll be back to confirm the correct procedure if I get any "proper" legal letters other than the usual Overdales toilet paper type of scare tactic.  
    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can some please explain Defaults


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3833 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there – I have a question re Defaults. I have a Default put on my Capital One card as I have missed some payments in 2011. Until then I have been paying regularly and at times twice a month to keep the payments up to-date. Then why have I got this Default when I have been making regular payments? Is this legal? As per below I have missed payments in May/June and then August. Since then regular payments of £10.00 every month was paid.

Payments made -Feb/April/July/Sep/Oct/Nov/Dec.

Thanks

Edited by NotPPIsavy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello just a quick reply: Yes this reporting is correct, if there are late or missed payments even if these are 'made up' a later date the creditor will have in the Ts & Cs a section showing why and when a they consider a default has occurred.

 

Reduced payments levels agreed or not are technically a default on the original contractually required payment levels.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Ok thank you. I am waiting for the Statements and all other documents to arrive from Capital One. As soon as I get these I will know if I have overpaid the account. If the account is paid off then will this still remain ad D or will it be shown as Satisfied?

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi there - having received all SAR docs from Capital One - the Default notice is unlawful as I never received the DN in the first place, and secondly one of the statements did not include my payment of £50.oo that along with the charges incurred led to going over the limit. So taken all these into account do you think I can get them to remove this as it is not lawfully enforced. thanks

sorry - i already asked this in my previous post - but found this one which is the correct post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing to stop Cap 1 issuing a new DN, and the alleged £50-00 missing payment from a statement is not a reason for removing the default.

 

A default notice is totally different to the actual default on the account.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - but the Default note should not be on my CR file because I have not exceeded 8 or more. Only 2 months and the balance is also wrong. So in actual fact the account is in dispute when they put the default note. Does this not make it unlawful to put a DN when there is a dispute on the account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exceeded what? 8 or more missed / late payments?

 

Creditors can and will default on as few a 3 missed payments there is no number fixed in legislation or guidance.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - My understanding is that after 8 late payments the creditors can put your account into default. However, in my case, if the missing £50 had been entered correctly the account would have been up to-date. Also now I know the account was up to-date and I am in credit so they had not put the correct information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - My understanding is that after 8 late payments the creditors can put your account into default. However, in my case, if the missing £50 had been entered correctly the account would have been up to-date. Also now I know the account was up to-date and I am in credit so they had not put the correct information.

 

You might like to have a read of this which explains about defaults....

 

http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/library/data_protection/detailed_specialist_guides/default_tgn_version_v3%20%20doc.ashx

 

Have you advised the lender of any dispute at all either recently or at the time? If not then they don't know of any dispute.

 

Have you started off the process of finding out what happened to that £50 payment which has not appeared on the account?

 

To stand a chance of getting the default removed you would need to show that the account was operated correctly at the time. That would mean getting this £50 payment traced and applied to the account properly. If that has the impact of putting the account into a properly managed state and then you successfully reclaim any resultant penalty charges then you stand a chance of getting the default removed as part of the deal.

 

Having said that, you have indicated that you had missed some payments so that could make it more difficult.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ims21 - when I did receive all my statements after a SAR request - I went through all the documents and when I realised the discrepancies I wrote to them and waiting to hear from them. So my PPI offer is also on hold at the moment as I need to sort out the discrepancies first and then will accept the offer subject to they send me the cheque to me. Trying to get all sorted step by step. I thought if I get the account sorted and then ask them to get the default sorted and then will ask them to send the PPI refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry - yes I missed the payments two months but I always paid 3 times more to make it up and to bring it up to-date.

 

That I'm afraid makes no difference at all the cumulative effect of late or missed payments will usually result in a default the figure of

8 is irrelevant the creditor will have their own system for deciding when a default is placed.

 

If the amount of £50 was received after the date a payment was due it results in an LPM when 'extra payments' are received to remedy previous late or missed payments they are not allocated to the months in which the LP or MPs occurred.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - my problem was I was paying by Direct Debit and debit card, and never had a look at my statements until now. Now I am learning to take control of everything, and noted the ones that I have over paid etc. Since PPI and going on this site I have learnt so much. Thanks to you all. Still learning and its a long way from getting things right. I will work through the cards and PPI and get back to you soon. I am very busy with work etc and cannot find the time sort out my finance. Getting there slowly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...