Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • According to Wikipedia - yeah, I know - the site is owned by Croydon Council. It's at least worth a try to contact the council and ask for a contact in The Colonnades. You could then lay it on thick about being a genuine customer and ask them to call their dogs off. It's got to be worth a try  https://www.croydon.gov.uk/contact-us/contact-us  
    • 4 hours were soft play with the kids then moved to one of the restaurants for a meal. Restaurant took ages with our order but it was a group of parents so we were in no massive rush.  Ive been trying to find how to determine 100% if the road is public or not as I just based my assumption on the street signs, traffic lights and the bus. Regarding the PCN, does it covers all requirements needed to enforce or do you guys see any clear weak spots? Considering the size of the place and different areas and businesses reachable through that road where the cameras are, I believe is a massive assumption to use those photographs to calculate the time someone was actually parked in a designated parking spot as there are numerous other areas to load, unload, wait for people, drive throughs of restaurants, etc all within the area accessible through the one road where the ANPR is. One can go through most of the areas on street view in google. You can even see a car parked in the middle of the roundabout for example.
    • thought your story rang a bell. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416315-knightsbridgecreditfix-iva-treated-me-very-badly-thinking-of-bk-now-help/ you vanished and never cameback. dx  
    • and it legally informs them of your correct and current address as you must do with all old debts last paid/used in say 7 yrs you dont want backdoor CCJ's. what were the names of these IVA scammers, the one you took it out with, and the one that scammed you to let them take over please? your story is slightly worrying. dx  
    • Incidentally, congratulations on not buying the warranty. That is another Big Motoring World rip-off. See what we have to say about extended warranties and the Big Motoring World attitude to them is particularly unhelpful
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Student Loan from 2004. Now living in Nz finally got a letter. what to do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3364 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

had a read of the forums and my problem looks similar to some others, but want to be sure, so if you could help me out and put my mind at rest that would be great.

 

Here is my situation:

 

Graduated Uni in 2004 with around 14k GBP of student loan debt (all other debt like CC and overdraft was paid off)

 

Moved to NZ that year, without earning enough in the UK to hit the repayment threshold.

At the time, I sent the letter to them advising I was going overseas for more than three months and they should use my parents house in the UK for correspondence.

 

As it happens, I ended up staying in NZ and settled down (great country)

 

Since I sent that letter in 2004, I have had nothing from the SLC to my parents house. not a single letter, so I have made no attempt to contact them or do anything more as it just didn't seem that important if they weren't actively chasing me.

 

Now, out of the blue, a letter arrives to my parents house saying I need to fill out an overseas assessment form within the next two months or start incurring monthly default charges of 250 quid (per month!).

 

I do intend to pay it off, but right now can't afford the amounts I know they will assess on my income if i fill out the form and send it back as we have just had a baby and my wife isn't working, and won't for at least 1 year, plus my mortgage is astronomical right now :(

 

So I have a few questions:

 

1) my loan is 'new style' from 2000-2004, but since they haven't contacted me in over ten years and I have made no payments ever is the debt not considered to be statute barred?

 

2) If it isn't statute barred, and I remain in NZ permanently, is there any practical way they can pursue the debt or effect my NZ credit record?

 

3) Is there any way I can defer payments for a couple of years, even though my gross income is well above the threshold required

 

4) are the default charges they intend to levy of 250 quid per month actually legal? they seem absolutely massive (circa 20% of the actual debt amount per year)

(ETA: I think I misread this charge as a penalty charge, when actually it is just their guess as to what you should pay, so it will come off the loan if I pay it rather than being tacked on. still very high though)

 

5) If i don't pay but come back to the UK for a holiday, is there anything they can do like have me arrested at the airport?

 

5) If I move back to the UK (no plans, but could happen) will I suddenly owe the entire amount? and will it harm my Uk credit record?

Edited by nonprayingmantis
Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK the new style student loans are what is termed 'contracts under seal' therefore it will be 12 years before it is SB.

 

There is absolutely no chance of you being arrested for this, being in debt is NOT a crime.

 

IMO I would not contact them for the time being.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that Bazooka Boo.

 

So, if true, that means if I ignore them for a couple of years then I the detb will be statute barred and the only way they can then enforce repayment is if I return to work in the UK and earn over the threshold, and even then the repayment will only ever be 9% of myincome over the limit.

 

If that is the case, what about things like penalty interest rates etc? I've seen a few places state there are penalties if you don't make the payments they assess, but I'm struggling to find out how much these penelties are, and whether they are legal or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry about penalty charges/fees etc, this can be argued later on if needs be.

 

Once a debt is SB it can never be unbarred, so cannot be collected.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
thanks for that Bazooka Boo.

 

So, if true, that means if I ignore them for a couple of years then I the detb will be statute barred and the only way they can then enforce repayment is if I return to work in the UK and earn over the threshold, and even then the repayment will only ever be 9% of myincome over the limit.

 

If that is the case, what about things like penalty interest rates etc? I've seen a few places state there are penalties if you don't make the payments they assess, but I'm struggling to find out how much these penelties are, and whether they are legal or not.

 

 

 

Hi,

 

just wondering if you ended up taking any action in relation to your post '98 student loan.

 

I am in a similar situation having recently been contacted by SLC and was wondering if / how you got the loan statute barred?

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...