Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mucky Hall - chasing old welcome debt


clampchamp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3917 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Evening all.

 

Been reading a lot of stuff (mostly bad, tbh) about the above mentioned company.

 

Had a letter from them on saturday morning regarding an old debt of mine.

The letter was addressed to me, they were asking if I was the addressee, and if I was, to contact them,

and if I wasn't, did I know where I could be found.

 

I fed the letter through my shredder...........

 

Let's start at the beginning.

 

In early 2008, we took a loan of 10k out, stupidly with Welscum Finance, which as most of you prolly know,

was flushed down the tubes by the high up shirts within the parent company, another dodgy lot by the name of Cattles Group.

 

Now due to marriage breakdown, the debt didn't get paid.

 

I've heard nothing for the last 5 years, but now it would appear that because Cattles has gone down the bog,

they've sold on some of their debts to this rather notorious bunch, or at least the administrators of Welscum have.

 

Now I'm no fool, and there is absolutely no way I would even think about phoning these people, even before I'd looked on here.

 

Obviously the debt is NOT Statute Barred as of yet, I believe it will be as of April 2014.

 

I'm very tempted just to sit back and see what happens, whether they know I am who they think I am.

I'm guessing that they will have bought the debt for next to nothing as it's nearly SB, and therefore very unlikely to ever be paid.

 

If I ignore the letters, are they likely to get more threatening??

 

It's up to them to prove the debt exists, right, not up to me to prove it doesn't??

 

Rather then ignoring their current letters, is it worth firing off a "prove it, fools" letter to them??:!:

 

We do know that Welscum were particularly poor at keeping paperwork, it was well documented some time ago that they lost a lot of customer information.

 

Obviously, for the moment I'm gonna continue using them as shredder food, (or possibly kindling for Sunday's bonfire) and there is NO way I'm gonna phone them.

 

I understand that MH are a really nasty lot, and we've already had a fight with another DCA that were particularly nasty, so I'm no stranger to fighting with these low-lives.

 

What's the worst these people can do??

 

Are they likely to push me into bankruptcy??

(Saves me the trouble of doing it, saves me the money and wipes off the other 23k we owe for a mortgage shortfall, so what's known as a win-win situation, I guess.......)

 

Anyway, I've finished rambling now, so thanks for reading and I look forward to seeing your replies and thoughts on these idiots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get your cra file

 

if they own the debt then it slightly changes things

 

but remember

 

MH dont do court

 

they wither farm it out

 

or

you'll find another DCA owns the debt

 

and

 

mH are just phishing for them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Morning all.

Received a phone call from Mucky Hall at 0830! this morning, which my daughter answered, asking to speak to the Mrs.

 

Now, I've been having letters on and off from them regarding a loan I had that is now Statute Barred

- or certainly very close to being, if it isn't already.

 

However, this morning they asked to speak to the Mrs, over what I believe is the same debt

they've been half-assededly chasing me for.

 

Sadly, she'd only just opened her eyes, and they asked her to confirm our address, which, foolishly, she did.

Soon as they mentioned the debt, (with Welcome Finance, no less) she said

"No, I think you'd better call back later, I've only just opened my eyes, can you call back later? Thanks, bye".

 

I think that they probably didn't have her as confirmed living here

- as they've also been sending letters out for a previous female tenant who owes a lot of cash.

Sadly, they now KNOW that she lives here. But why did they ask for her and not me??

 

The thing that really confuses me, is that the call came from the 01633 area code

- which we know is Newport/Cwmbran, coz we used to live there.

Anyone that knows MH will know that they're based in Bellshill, Kilmarnock.

 

If they call back today, I shall be telling them to crawl back under their stone in no uncertain terms.

I know the drill - admit nothing, deny as much as you feel you can legally get away with.

I shall also be telling them the debt is statute barred, and that any further correspondence MUST be in writing.

 

Anyone else agree with that??

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is probably PRA the 'owner of MH, now taking a very active part in debtor tracing and identification.

 

If you have not done so you need to get credit reference checks done to establish the true status of this account.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this could Be Pra U.K Management Services with a main address in Cardiff and sub office in Newport.

 

see post 2#

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The domestic authority assures me that the chap said he works for Mucky Hall. I know exactly what the debt is, and I know exactly how much it is. I'm also pretty certain that it's statute barred.

However, my credit score can't be so bad - I managed to get finance for a nearly new car. (at a premium, I grant you, but not as high as some companies wanted me to pay) I KNOW that the debt they are chasing me for was sold to them, as it's Welcome, which as everyone knows, was flushed down the khazi by the big-wigs.

 

The bit that bothers me, is why did they ask to speak to my wife when they've been writing to me about it, trying me to take the bait and contact them, which I haven't done. Maybe because I haven't taken the bait, they're trying a different tack??

 

They've no chance of getting a penny from me - so they might as well give up and crawl back under their stone now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they will say MH or on behalf of MH.

 

PRAs 'skills' are in tracing and identification services.

 

Does this show on CRA files?

 

Stat barred = NO payment and/or written acknowledgement of the debt in 6 clear years (5 in Scotland).

 

The CRA check is VERY important as many of these Welcome accounts have been defaulted only just before the debt is sold to a debt purchaser, which opens up a whole new problem.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised if these PRA people aren't totally kosher - pulled them up through Google. It appears that one of their directors (now resigned) has/has had his grubby little fingers in an awful lot of pies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRA check?? So I need to sign up for the free thirty day gubbins from Experian? I defaulted on the debt quite some time before Welcome went belly-up, I believe. The ABSOLUTE latest we would have paid anything back on it would have been July 08 - although we're both pretty certain we never paid for at least a year before that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRA check?? So I need to sign up for the free thirty day gubbins from Experian? I defaulted on the debt quite some time before Welcome went belly-up, I believe. The ABSOLUTE latest we would have paid anything back on it would have been July 08 - although we're both pretty certain we never paid for at least a year before that.

You could try Noddle (Call Credit) always free but not always up to date, but what you are looking for is a default date, if the entry is not on file then the default is more than 6 years old and has been removed.

BUT I would suggest checking Experian or Equifax for confirmation.

 

Get this data and I can draft a complete challenge on this for you.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right then.

 

Accessed my credit file. It's bad.

 

The OFFICIAL default date for this debt is 04/08/2009.

 

However payments were being missed all the way back to 2007.

 

Looking at my file, nothing has been paid on the account since at least July 2008,

 

so as far as I'm concerned, we defaulted at this as the earliest date.

 

However we were behind from at least October 2007, then brought it up to date,

then finally threw in the towel in December 2008.

 

So where do we stand, as it certainly appears it's NOT Statute Barred in the eyes of the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely not Stat Barred, not defaulted because the account was brought up to date.

There is no way reason to challenge the default date as far as O can see.

Stat barred as said 6 clear years with NO payments.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what do we do next??

We've just been binning their letters up to now - they just say the usual; are you xxx, do you know where xxx is.

Weird that they phoned the domestic authority instead of me today though.

 

As a little aside,

I have/had another debt for a mortgage shortfall from 2008.

On my credit record, it shows this debt as "Settled" on 15/04/2009.

I never settled it, but I do know the debt was sold.

 

Seeing as it's now settled, does that mean we're still liable??

 

I do get a company writing to me on a semi-regular basis about it, but as they insist I fill in an income/expenditure sheet,

I just bin them.

 

The company that write to me are called HL solicitors, a Manchester based company.

 

The way I see it, if the debt is settled, it no longer exists, correct?? Therefore it's unenforceable.

This particular company have never done a credit search on my file, where as Mucky Hall have done several.

Sounds to me like HL Solicitors are just dipping a toe in to see if I take the bait?? Or am I missing something??

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what do we do next?? We've just been binning their letters up to now - they just say the usual; are you xxx, do you know where xxx is. Weird that they phoned the domestic authority instead of me today though.

 

As a little aside, I have/had another debt for a mortgage shortfall from 2008. On my credit record, it shows this debt as "Settled" on 15/04/2009. I never settled it, but I do know the debt was sold. Seeing as it's now settled, does that mean we're still liable?? I do get a company writing to me on a semi-regular basis about it, but as they insist I fill in an income/expenditure sheet, I just bin them. The company that write to me are called HL solicitors, a Manchester based company. The way I see it, if the debt is settled, it no longer exists, correct?? Therefore it's unenforceable. This particular company have never done a credit search on my file, where as Mucky Hall have done several. Sounds to me like HL Solicitors are just dipping a toe in to see if I take the bait?? Or am I missing something??

 

I don't know where you picked up the idea that this debt showing 'settled' means it no longer exists, this is often put forward by a rather delusional bunch call the Freemen on/of the Land who contend that because a debt purchaser has paid the creditor for the debt the debtors liability no longer subsists, this is absolute nonsense.##

 

Yes you are missing a great deal!!

 

Your debt remains collectable and probably enforceable as well.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Recent update to this thread.

 

Still no written contact from Mucky Hall, although they did phone again a couple of weeks ago.

Asked to speak to the domestic authority,

I asked who was calling and they identified themselves,

so I told them that I told them before, no phonecalls, written contact only.

 

The bloke said in a broad Glaswegian accent, 'okay, fine, have it your way then', and hung up.

 

Heard nothing from HL Solicitors for a while now, either. It's gone quiet, and that worries me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said before wait for written contact, do not be tempted to phone them or answer any security questions on the phone.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

it might pay you to sar welcome

90% of their debts are usually PENALTY charges & PPI

or other 'compulsory' insurances

 

what was the account with them

and

how much is outstanding?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account with them is for a homeowner loan we took out on a property we bought.

 

This loan was 10,000 - and stupidly, we took it from Welscome Finance.

 

The amount we would have paid back, over 5 years was an astronomical 17,200.

 

We were young and stoopid!!!!

 

obviously Welscome were flushed down the khazi by the bigwigs and the debt was sold.

 

Mucky Hall are now the proud new owners of my debt.

 

I could SAR them but isn't that likely to stir up a hornet's nest??

 

Are they actually still trading?

 

Their website just says that they are no longer taking applications for new loans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...