Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unum PHI payments stopped ME/CFS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3978 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone I would like some advice regarding Unum who my employer has PHI through.

 

I have been on long term sickness from April 2012 with me/cfs. I am signed off by my doctor.

 

Today I received a letter from my employer stating Unum have decided to stop my payments. I am unable to contact Unum directly so emailed my employer who stated 'Unum can stop payments at any time'? I advised I think this is discrimination and asked for the reports as to why.

 

How can they just stop my money with no explanation not sure where to go as my employer is also looking to get rid of me so waiting for a date for 'formal long term sickness meeting'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I hope the forum guys can advise from an HR point of view.

 

Unum are known to play hardball and I know someone who had a couple of problems with them along the lines of yours. We've had other reports on here too. From what I've seen, they can decide you're fine when you're not, but I don't suppose they're the only insurer to do this.

 

To argue your case, you need to get hold of what Unum have said about you so you can see if they're playing by their own rules. Do you know what the name of your employer's cover is please?

 

I hope the guys will be able to advise you how to get hold of the information you need or to get your HR people to argue. Is there a broker or intermediary involved please?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds like it might be 3 month qualifying period + 12 months pay out?

 

You really need to know what was covered under the policy.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HR should completely know what they were paying premiums for, and it may be in your contract of employment?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm only in here briefly tonight but I have been through this personally myself.

 

As Emmzzi says, you must contact HR and find out the exact terms of the policy.

I believe your employer is obliged to give you the policy terms, I attained a copy under the Data Protection Act.

 

I had major problems with my company attempting to 'terminate my employment', whilst they were not bothered in chasing up UNUM to establish the exact reason as to why the policy stopped paying. In my circumstances I was still entitled to cover, (i.e. the terms had not finished) and UNUM sent me to a Psychiatrist in an attempt to place ME/CFS under mental health when in is recognised as neurological.

 

UNUM were really awful, and I had a fight for the policy to continue whilst in employment. My employer like yours attempted to get rid of me, but I took advice from a solicitor who has expertise in this area.

 

I believe your employer has to follow up with UNUM properly, ie if you want to know why payment has stopped. They cant just take UNUMs word for it, there is an 'appeal process' which the employer is obliged to perform on your behalf if you request this of them. This is of course relevant to the policy still having time to run, and UNUM just stopping payment as they (find any excuse to) decide you are not covered ie fit for work.

 

I know I am not allowed to advertise on here, but there as details of this in a well know ME magazine. With leaflets also available for advice on PHI.

You might want to call them up and purchase a leaflet, and a magazine for some advice.

 

Also searching on PHI and employer responsibilities on the internet can bring up some interesting reading.

 

Also, as the ball has started rolling you might want to sent DPA requests to both UNUM and your employer.

UNUM send you all your info directly (due to confidentiality) so don't let your employer tell you they are entitled to see all of UNUMs notes.

Likewise, you should get a complete copy of the policy and all correspondence between your employer and UNUM, from your employer which should fall under the DPA also.

 

Not a nice thing to request from the employer, and mine got quite annoyed with me for requesting it. But I found out that my employer was not completing the documents accurately to UNUM, in addition to the basic fact UNUM were using any excuse not to pay.

 

Im sorry I cant help any further tonight, Ive just signed on quickly as I have ATOS issues.

 

Funny enough i've heard the ATOS test was contributed to by UNUM!

 

Good Luck

 

Me_too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unum have been acting as advisers to the govt since the mid-90s, this has been reported by Private Eye. They were bought in by Peter Lilley. If you want to get an idea of what you're up against, Google for Unum scandal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unum have been acting as advisers to the govt since the mid-90s, this has been reported by Private Eye. They were bought in by Peter Lilley. If you want to get an idea of what you're up against, Google for Unum scandal.

 

Hello there.

 

Thank you for this, but DWP issues don't necessarily help with employer insurance issues. It's better to stay focussed on that in my view, rather than veer off into Unum's problems in the States and involvement with our national policy, if you don't mind my saying. It could depress the OP.

 

I agree with what you're saying, but this is an employment matter. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...