Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dlc, hillesden securities, egg, citi


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you for this.

 

So what do you suggest the next steps be? Should I send them the dispute letter? Knowing from their previous credit file updates, one would imagine they should be able to prove 'absolute assignment' sooner or later. Is it still worth sending them the letter?

 

What are the repercussions of sening or not sending the 'dispute' letter?

 

Also as per their last paragraph, should I continue the payments?

 

 

Much obliged!!

Edited by w1n3pd
Link to post
Share on other sites

if this does not show on your cra file

 

its dropped off through a default over 6yrs old

 

it CANNOT return

 

so they are stuffed!!

 

did you send the failure to comply letter?

 

if you did

 

then stop payment

 

theres nowt they can do to you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

discount offer

they know they are stuffed

 

pay us something before we lose a cash cow

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello All,

 

I have received the attached letter today. There are 24 other pages with it. I think I might be in a bit of a trouble. Please refer to the attach and guide as to what should I do now. Please remember that it doesn't appear on my credit file any more but since DLC has produced these documents, does it mean they can enforce it?

 

What should my next course of action be?

 

Thanks.

Edited by w1n3pd
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is supposedly a reconstituted agreement complying with sections 77/78 CCA 1974.

 

It must have the following data:

 

Your name and address at the inception of the agreement.

The Creditors name and address at the inception.

ALL the Ts& Cs relevant at inception and any other documents mentioned in the Ts & Cs

All T &cs at closure and all amendments made during the life of the agreement.

 

Without these it does NOT comply.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, i think the answer to all of your questions is yes. They probably have given all of the above information. What are my options now? I shall look for any discrepancies but I think they have provided with all the information. I am attaching the first page for your perusal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that the agreement has my signature etc. However I do not understand the following;

 

All T &cs at closure and all amendments made during the life of the agreement.

 

There are 2 T&Cs attached. One looks like it is taken from internet. As they are generic terms and conditions pertaining to egg.

 

 

I am really at a loss of my next move. Please advise as to what should I do next?

 

 

As DLC doesnt appear on my credit file any longer.

 

Also,

 

 

  • 1 does it mean if I keep on paying them? Does it mean that my credit file would not be again marked down by DLC or any other subsidiary of theirs if they further sell it to them?
  • 2 Should I keep paying them? If not what are the repercussions?

 

 

Please advise as DLC is asking for renegotiations, I am a little worried that their harassment would start again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its gone off your cra file yrs ago

can never come back!!

so them saying 'hey PS will HELP YOU is utter garbage!!

 

stop paying them

you'll get loads of scary letters

but if they've offered a discount

then they know its a dead duck.

 

they can produce the agreement.

but I bet it was terminated by egg years ago.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hello dx,

 

This post is intended to just to keep you updated with any progress on this one.

 

I am following your advice all the way i.e. no more payments or correspondence with them.

 

Thought the attach would make a nice reading.

 

Please let me know if you spot any personal details on this letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey brig

 

read the pdf above

 

what waffle

 

their actions by their own admission are ILLEGAL

 

since when has debt been criminal?

strange letter!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me thinks that letter has been cobbled together badly and parts date back to when there was indeed 'criminal offence' for failure to comply with a CCA request.

 

I would advise rejecting the contents and stating that UNLESS the request is complied with EXACTLY on time the account is in dispute and will remain so until the request is satisfied.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me thinks that letter has been cobbled together badly and parts date back to when there was indeed 'criminal offence' for failure to comply with a CCA request.

 

I would advise rejecting the contents and stating that UNLESS the request is complied with EXACTLY on time the account is in dispute and will remain so until the request is satisfied.

 

 

Thanks brig, I have written the following to them already.

 

 

 

As of today, I acknowledge the receipt of the letter dated 25th of July. I have gone through the contents of your letter and reject your findings as of below.

 

 

 

1. I consider account still in dispute and reject the contents as unless the request is complied with EXACTLY on time the account is in dispute and will remain so until the request is satisfied.

 

2. I am still waiting for all the information that you are supposed to provide under s77/78.

 

 

 

Therefore, I categorically dispute this account and your suggestion of tracing me further is nullified on these grounds. Any reinstatement of this account and threatening correspondence would tantamount to extortionist behaviour and would be liable for criminal proceedings against you once a complaint has been lodged and strongly pursued with the ICO subsequently.

 

 

 

Sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello All,

 

Further to my correspondence above with DLC I received the update on this one last week from DLC again. Which was just a copy of their previous letter. Asking me to pay. That letter has already been attached in this thread previously where they bullet point and outline why I should pay. I am just waiting and seeing their next move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...