Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court and ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding them if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
    • I see the trial of the real criminal in the Biden Family has started rather than the sham political persecution of Trump    Biden will of course try to distance himself as far as possible to no avail  Even more votes for The Donald🤣    
    • Savings platform Raisin UK is offering a £50 bonus for new customers who sign up for an account.View the full article
    • With Farage back in the news, here's a reminder of his interview with Claire Byrne on Irish TV a few years ago.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Baliffs Get Them


Guest HUSBANDKHAN
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6436 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest HUSBANDKHAN

I Have Sent Out S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) To 2 Bailiff Companies. These Are :

Jbw ENFORCEMENTS LTD. ALSO Ccs Ltd Who Were Featured In Whistleblower Earlier On In The Month. See What They Say. Jbw Owe Me £7500 Approx(will Ask For A Breakdown Of Costs Etc) Ccs Owe Me £601.89 Again Will Chase This. I HAVE Upset Some Major People In These Companies. Will Update Again As Soon As I HeAR Anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go for it HK,

the more people fight back, the more these companies will be held to task! AND made to pay for their sheer lack of respect for peoples rights.

Friendship costs nothing but its rewards can be priceless. Do not judge, as you will not be judged but if you can, try and assist where possible.:smile:

everyone is entitled to MY opinion!:D

I offer my comments without prejudice or liability.

If you found my advice helpful, please click the scales at the top.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Have Sent Out S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) To 2 Bailiff Companies. These Are :

Jbw Ltd And Ccs Ltd Who Were Featured In Whistleblower Earlier On In The Month. See What They Say. Jbw Owe Me £7500 Approx(will Ask For A Breakdown Of Costs Etc) Ccs Owe Me £601.89 Again Will Chase This. I HAVE Upset Some Major People In These Companies. Will Update Again As Soon As I HeAR Anything.

 

Correction. JBW were NOT featured in Whistleblower; CCS were.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HUSBANDKHAN
I Have Sent Out S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) To 2 Bailiff Companies. These Are :

Jbw Ltd . Ccs Ltd Who Were Featured In Whistleblower Earlier On In The Month. See What They Say. Jbw Owe Me £7500 Approx(will Ask For A Breakdown Of Costs Etc) Ccs Owe Me £601.89 Again Will Chase This. I HAVE Upset Some Major People In These Companies. Will Update Again As Soon As I HeAR Anything. i also rang medway councils parkin section and told thm that thier 40 days were up. the pretended that they had not recieved the sar. theyre lying i put it through their letter box !!!!!! then when i phoned again all of a sudden it was found. gave them till next weds. if no reply then will pull them into court and ask how their charges are made up? even if the government sets them they are the governments agents etc. see what they say to that ? because a pcn on issue is £30 the 28 days later it goes upto £60 then upto £90 then £95 and passed to a bailiff. what i ant to know is where does the original £30 come from and also why does it go upto £60 i assume £5 for the dvla search and also 50p admin apart from that how is it worked out and justified. also i am now also thinking of asking the police for the same thing and see if they can justify the £60 for speeding etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Have Sent Out S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) To 2 Bailiff Companies. These Are :

Jbw Ltd . Ccs Ltd Who Were Featured In Whistleblower Earlier On In The Month. See What They Say. Jbw Owe Me £7500 Approx(will Ask For A Breakdown Of Costs Etc) Ccs Owe Me £601.89 Again Will Chase This. I HAVE Upset Some Major People In These Companies. Will Update Again As Soon As I HeAR Anything. i also rang medway councils parkin section and told thm that thier 40 days were up. the pretended that they had not recieved the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). theyre lying i put it through their letter box !!!!!! then when i phoned again all of a sudden it was found. gave them till next weds. if no reply then will pull them into court and ask how their charges are made up? even if the government sets them they are the governments agents etc. see what they say to that ? because a pcn on issue is £30 the 28 days later it goes upto £60 then upto £90 then £95 and passed to a bailiff. what i ant to know is where does the original £30 come from and also why does it go upto £60 i assume £5 for the dvla search and also 50p admin apart from that how is it worked out and justified. also i am now also thinking of asking the police for the same thing and see if they can justify the £60 for speeding etc.

 

HusbandKhan - you clearly have some 'authority' issues don't you?

 

The parking penalty is issued at £60 (depending on the area) - that's the cost of parking incorrectly. You are offered a 50% discount on the penalty if you pay it within the stipulated time. That's £30 if you admit you shouldn't have parked incorrectly. If you don't pay within the stipulated time, the penalty increases (as you are advised in writing) by 50%. That's £90. The authority eventually registers the penalty with Northampton County Court's Traffic Enforcement Centre, after you ignore all those letters and notices they sent. That adds £5 to the cost.

 

When you ignore their final letter, they issue the warrant to the bailiff because there's nothing else they can do, as you're ignoring them, and the bailiffs add their fees because they don't work free of charge and no one else (like the taxpayers) wants to pay for them to recover what you should have paid in the first place at £30.

 

All issues of bad bailiffs and overcharging aside, not to mention incorrectly issued penalty charge notices, all of which are legitimate gripes, that's how it works.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its because you are a bailiff ?

 

What does that mean? 'Its because you are a bailiff'

 

Of course I'm a bailiff!

 

So does that preclude me from making posts which I would hope are useful and also go someway to demonstrate that bailiffs want bailiffs to operate correctly as well as debtors (and creditors)?

 

If bad bailiffs didn't exist, good bailiffs might be able to get on with doing the job of recovering debt from those who owe it without getting threatened every five minutes and assaulted on a regular basis.

 

Is it because you're a debtor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi blfuk1,

I applaud you for coming to this site and offering help to those who have, for whatever reason, have found themselves in debt and experiencing difficulties with bailiffs. As you say, and I agree, not all bailiffs are as bad as some we have encountered on here. I had the good fortune of dealing with a Bailiff who assisted us with payment plans which in turn allowed us to clear our debts owed. If all Bailiffs worked that way most of the people posting on here wouldnt be here. Its a fact that in all aspects of life there are bad apples in the barrel, this unfortunately has a detrimental effect on those working within the guidelines such as yourself.

Keep up the good work!

Friendship costs nothing but its rewards can be priceless. Do not judge, as you will not be judged but if you can, try and assist where possible.:smile:

everyone is entitled to MY opinion!:D

I offer my comments without prejudice or liability.

If you found my advice helpful, please click the scales at the top.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does that mean? 'Its because you are a bailiff'

 

Of course I'm a bailiff!

 

So does that preclude me from making posts which I would hope are useful and also go someway to demonstrate that bailiffs want bailiffs to operate correctly as well as debtors (and creditors)?

 

If bad bailiffs didn't exist, good bailiffs might be able to get on with doing the job of recovering debt from those who owe it without getting threatened every five minutes and assaulted on a regular basis.

 

Is it because you're a debtor?

 

DELETED BY MOD

These comments are completely and utterly unacceptable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to stick up for blfuk1. I think it's downright disgusting the way you have been attacking him. He is on this site, offering genuinely helpful information to you in order to help you out, and you have thrown it back in his face! :evil:

 

Furthermore, some of your comments are bordering on threatening.

 

I think those prepared to offer "inside information" as it were on this forum are particularly brave and are to be commended for speaking out against what they believe to be wrong, or to help people achieve their goals more quickly. 8-)

 

Blfuk1, I hope you don't feel too put off by this attack, and I hope you'll just ignore it and continue to help out the people who appreciate your efforts.

edinburghbeerbucket :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to stick up for blfuk1. I think it's downright disgusting the way you have been attacking him. He is on this site, offering genuinely helpful information to you in order to help you out, and you have thrown it back in his face! :evil:

 

Furthermore, some of your comments are bordering on threatening.

 

I think those prepared to offer "inside information" as it were on this forum are particularly brave and are to be commended for speaking out against what they believe to be wrong, or to help people achieve their goals more quickly. 8-)

 

Blfuk1, I hope you don't feel too put off by this attack, and I hope you'll just ignore it and continue to help out the people who appreciate your efforts.

 

Thanks. Never mind, if he does kneecaps as well as he spells, I should be safe enough!

 

The man who strikes first admits that his ideas have given out.

Chinese Proverb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HUSBANDKHAN

i am not against any professional as long as they are doing their job. it only gets me when some one is throwing laws at you which are completely incorrect and hold your elderly parent sto ransom. jbw when they arrived sat inside my parents house and also threatned them with having me arrested and also having them arrested while i was out sorting the money side of things out. the bailif inquestion can be seen on jbw website :JBW Your first choice enforcement agency

he has since become the director of administration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am not against any professional as long as they are doing their job. it only gets me when some one is throwing laws at you which are completely incorrect and hold your elderly parent sto ransom. jbw when they arrived sat inside my parents house and also threatned them with having me arrested and also having them arrested while i was out sorting the money side of things out. the bailif inquestion can be seen on jbw website :JBW Your first choice enforcement agency he has since become the director of administration.

 

Fair point.

 

JBW have never had a contract with any MCC or HMCS area so they would not have been dealing with you on an unpaid fine where it is appropriate to advise that a consequence of non-payment to the bailiff would lead to a warrant of arrest to bring the debtor back before the bench.

 

As it is then more likely to have been a parking penalty, it is entirely inappropriate to suggest 'arrest' as parking penalties are not criminal matters and there is no criminal court involvement or sanction. The bailiff was out of order and should be reported for making such threats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note the company is called JBW Enforcement Limited and not JBW Limited and I am the Managing Director and this story is not true and we have no details of this person not the demand. JBW do not work for HMCS and also WE DID NOT APPEAR ON THE BBC WHISTLEBLOWER SHOW so please do not make comments that are not true...... If you do have an honest complaint then pleasse contact our offices we will listen to it....... 0870 855 3560

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Mr Khan I now have details of who you are and how much money you paid and why and that you have lost every appeal and court case you have attempted.

 

I will not like you publish details on this site due to the DPA but please everyone this is an untrue case the courts have made that order and not me nor JBW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest MizzPiggy

It is interesting to note....

That people do not want to be seen as a Debtor....yet we judge a Bailiff as being a bad one.

Our Service deals with 40 complaints a day and we do not launch till the 1st of November. Behind the scenes we have established our networks and dealt with many Bailiff Companies to date.

In defence to this Company, we have had a single complaint in 3 months, to which the person we were representing, was in fact in the wrong persay. They have been the most transparent company to which we have found to date.

They call people customers not debtors, their staff friendly and are prepared to listen to what you say. I feel sure after dealing with this company, that If you have a grievance that they will take the matter seriously.

 

This Company does in fact have ethics and a standard that has quite suprised our service.

 

My suggestion is that you write to them or call to make the complaint. If you have a further issue and do not feel heard, then contact our service and we will happily take the matter up for you.

 

I think it is important to understand, that Bailiffs appear moulded in our eyes to be a certain type of character, but so much of that is a system and beliefs of which we are led to believe. It is often the system that lets you down knowing your rights together with how it works, it is the Bailiff that is the end result of this........... that is your face to it all.

 

There are some good ones out there....the bad apples the ones that need to be weedled out. When you have a bad apple seek help to find who to write to, you do have a right to be heard....the good ones we are happy to support...I think it is good to have a Bailiffs views, to which if he/she takes the time to come here and post anything about the "dark side", as we call it (laughs), then this person and others deserve respect for their views.

 

The Office of Fair Trading have standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HUSBANDKHAN

right first he denies any knowledge then he claims he knows who i am ? strange isnt it ? anyway i did not say that you were on the whistle blower programme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Khan, as I said please contact our offices or even me direct if you have a problem, Mr Jamie Waller is my name and we will deal with it, I promise. What we will not do is overturn an order of the court nor continue to waste the courts time, why don't you let this site service those with honest complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HUSBANDKHAN

You Had That Chance When I Originally Took This Up. Any Way. You Should Have Recieved The Relevant Request And Fee By Now ! I Await Your Reply Etc. I Will However Update This Thread Everytime I Recieve A Letter Or Any Correspondance From You. You Had The Chance And Now When I Have Mentioned You In This Forum You Want Me To Back Down Again ? Sorry. Everybody Just To Prove A Point. I Named And Shamed This Company Only This Morning And I Now Have The Director Himself Communicating With Me. It Works. Try It !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6436 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...