Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

that's ok , just missed a month.

 

theres nothing wrong in paying what you can whwn you can.

 

shows goodwill where it might be seen as avoidance in a way.

 

go well for him IF it ever went to court

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dishidox,

#DX100 has asked me to look in on this.

 

In my opinion if a statutory demand is made it could be set aside because this company has not exhausted the lesser methods of debt collection up to including a county court claim.

The bankruptcy process should be the last resort of the debt collection procedures.

 

I can if need be draft a letter for you later today.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dishidox,

#DX100 has asked me to look in on this.

 

In my opinion if a statutory demand is made it could be set aside because this company has not exhausted the lesser methods of debt collection up to including a county court claim.

The bankruptcy process should be the last resort of the debt collection procedures.

 

I can if need be draft a letter for you later today.

 

The grounds for setting aside a statutory demand (as per Rule 6.5 Insolvency Rules 1986) are as follows:

 

(a)the debtor appears to have a counterclaim, set-off or cross demand which equals or exceeds the amount of the debt or debts specified in the statutory demand; or .

(b)the debt is disputed on grounds which appear to the court to be substantial; or .

©it appears that the creditor holds some security in respect of the debt claimed by the demand, and either Rule 6.1(5) is not complied with in respect of it, or the court is satisfied that the value of the security equals or exceeds the full amount of the debt; or .

(d)the court is satisfied, on other grounds, that the demand ought to be set aside.

 

There is nothing to prevent a creditor using the bankruptcy route rather than the country court route, so do ensure that one of the above grounds is considered - otherwise a set aside may not be granted at the hearing, and it could trigger further costs. I agree, in principle, with what you're saying - that bankruptcy should be a last resort, and luckily most judges will totally agree with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi brigadier thank you ever so much for looking at this and please could you draft a letter as I'm way out of depth with this, but I'm trying to help a desperate friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi brigadier thank you ever so much for looking at this and please could you draft a letter as I'm way out of depth with this, but I'm trying to help a desperate friend

 

Ok will do that for you as soon as I can.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA +Copy to Creditor.

I'm just waiting for some docs to come through that are urgent, the I'll get on to the letter.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is the original thread with the right attachment sorry for any confusion

 

hello everyone,

im trying to get some advice for my friend who is in fiancial difficulty at the minute, he got made redunant 2011

 

after being on the dole a while they helped him set up a business,

 

everything was going well but the work started slowing down,

 

he had a account with a builders merchant that was fine,

he asked to pay reduced payments for a while to get himself back on track as work is slow,

 

they agreed but now want silly repayments back £500 per month

 

he said he couldnt afford it and offered £100

they said no but will accept £250 per month,

 

he wrote back saying

im sorry payments too high i dont want to say yes then cant pay

please accept my payments of £100,

 

received a letter(see attached ) this morning threating bankruptcy

 

he doesnt own his home he lives with his girlfriend in he rown house (he is not on mortage) hes in bits & worried sick,he wants to pay the debt but they are being unreasonable

if anybody could give some advice for him it would be greatly received

 

 

 

To Whom it may concern.

 

Re: Proposed Statutory Demand For Payment.

 

I refer to the letter date xx xx xxxx threatening the issue of a Statutory Demand for Payment regarding a debt in the sum of £ xxxx.xx relating to a trade account with xxxxxxxx builders merchants.

 

 

For your information and for the avoidance for misunderstanding please note the following;

 

I xxxxxxxx state that I have no realisable assets to meet any such demand.

I do not own outright or jointly any property.

I have made reasonable offers of payment of the outstanding amount which have been rejected without due consideration to my current financial status.

I am able to make an offer of £xxx.xx per calendar month which should be given reasonable consideration.

Should a statutory demand be made I will apply for it to be set aside for the reasons stated above.

 

All due consideration should be given to the above and the saving of costs and court time.

 

Signed..........................: Date...............................: print name.

 

Witness to signature...............Date.........................: print name.

 

Apologies for delay called away.

Edited by BRIGADIER2JCS

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

To Whom it may concern.

 

Re: Proposed Statutory Demand For Payment.

 

I refer to the letter date xx xx xxxx threatening the issue of a Statutory Demand for Payment regarding a debt in the sum of £ xxxx.xx relating to a trade account with xxxxxxxx builders merchants.

 

 

For your information and for the avoidance for misunderstanding please note the following;

 

I xxxxxxxx state that I have no realisable assets to meet any such demand.

I do not own outright or jointly any property.

 

.

 

Apologies for delay called away.

 

 

Please don't take this the wrong way. Whilst this may be a good reason for the litigator not to pursue a Bankruptcy petition, it is hardly a reason for a court to dismiss one.

 

Bankruptcy is after all a condition where one does not have the means to meet thier obligations, by its definition.

 

I take it that his is not an application for a charging order or the like.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Creditor is not going to achieve the outcome it desires if a petition is made and I would expect them to get far less than they would if they accepted a repayment plan, even if they made a claim via the county court.

 

BTW I have achieved SD set aside on exactly the same grounds for others in this situation when there are no realisable assets, judges perceive how pointless such action is in this situation.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everybody for all the advice all letters sent now just wait to see what happens I'll keep you all posted

 

Let's hope this gets sorted out now!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you brigadier vue been a star

 

Always happy to help!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Everybody,

My friend has received this letter back from the dca company this morning ( please see attched)

also he sent a letter again asking builders merchants to accept monthly payments for £100 plus he put a cheque for £100 in with it (letter dated 28.05.2013) £98.64 has been deducted from the amount in this last letter

any advice would be greatly received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at least they are going the CCJ route not BR.

 

So I would suggest he sends this to the BM now.

 

 

Si/Madam,

 

I refer to my recent letter regarding the payment of the outstanding amount of £xxxx.xx with which I enclosed a payment of £100.00 and offered to clear this debt at this rate per calendar month, the cheque has been cashed.

 

I had expected some understanding of my situation and that you would give due regard to this reasonable offer although it seems I was mistaken having now received your letter dated xx xx xxxxx stating you that you are issuing a county court claim.

 

I would urge you to reconsider my reasonable offer once again as I will be stating in court how I have tried to resolve this matter without recourse to litigation ad as with court costs, solicitors cost added to the balance should you achieve a judgement I shall have to ask the court to order a much lower level of payment.

 

So I confirm that my offer of £100.00 pcm stands despite previous rejections and would suggest that this accepted to save costs and court time.

 

OK recorded deliver addressed to their Company Secretary.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hello everyone,

just an update since the last letter my friend has received nothing from anyone so hes just been paying the £100 as he agreed to do, he sent all the letters he received from the debt people to oft and trading standards which there looking into, so all is quiet at the min, thank you all for your brilliant advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...