Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Repossession questioned by deeds not being signed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3746 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you insist on using the untried and untested 'ideas' posted on this thread, I beg you to at least use them in conjunction with tried and tested methods, don't put your home at risk as a result of accepting these 'ideas'.

 

I am personally deeply saddened that you have come across this thread and now considering these ' ideas' - if you can, please speak to a Solicitor first, even if it is just an initial discussion meeting.

 

I am still using "tried and tested" methods but they are not working

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So Ben you have a letter from my friends to their solicitor ASKING for this to be done??

I think not

 

What ?

 

Of course I don't have a letter from your 'friend' to their solicitor

 

Why would I have it and how would I have got it ?

 

Makes no sense.

 

Yes Mark, I am Bones

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ben,

No because you will find NO letter from any borrower stating please send this on to the LR, only they send it to the LENDER.

Your so sad that people are trying these methods, well as I've said before and you and others have over looked here

There are 2 TWO cases which have stopped all possession hearing because of the question of deeds not being signed.

I would also point out that until the Norgan case which I am sure you, or may be not agree had no help from CAG was done as a first ' TEST' case but that is only any good if the borrower can pay the extra and has the time to do it within the term and then the rates go up and up.

As said before there is no reason for you to worry I am sure a D/J and C/J know what they are doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ben,

No because you will find NO letter from any borrower stating please send this on to the LR, only they send it to the LENDER.

Your so sad that people are trying these methods, well as I've said before and you and others have over looked here

There are 2 TWO cases which have stopped all possession hearing because of the question of deeds not being signed.

I would also point out that until the Norgan case which I am sure you, or may be not agree had no help from CAG was done as a first ' TEST' case but that is only any good if the borrower can pay the extra and has the time to do it within the term and then the rates go up and up.

As said before there is no reason for you to worry I am sure a D/J and C/J know what they are doing.

 

The borrowers solicitor sends the mortgage deed to the land registry when the solicitor requests the borrowers to registered as the owner of the legal estate. The borrower does not send it to the lender.

 

Your providing advice when you are not even familiar with the actual process ?

 

To answer your question, no I don't have a copy of a letter that doesn't exist.

 

Yes Mark, I am Bones

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOU ARE WRONG YET AGAIN BEN THE BORROWERS SOLICITOR DID NOT SEND THE DEED TO THE LR AT ALL BUT TO THE LENDER AS I HAVE A COPY OF THE LETTER AND IT CONFIRMED.

sO IF YOU ARE SAYING THAT THEY ARE LIEING AND HAVE COMMITTED FRAUD THEN I'll BE HAPPY TO TELL THEM.

i AM AND HAVE BEEN VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE ACTUAL PROCESS FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS WHEN DEALING WITH THESE CASE.

AND YOU HAVE ANSWERED YOUR OWN QUESTION YET AGAIN

Link to post
Share on other sites

A snippet from the Law Society

 

http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/for-the-public/common-legal-issues/buying-a-home/

 

 

Completion

 

This is the final stage in the conveyancing process when your solicitor hands over the money to the seller and the keys are released to you. Your solicitor will pay the stamp duty land tax and Land Registry fees on your behalf. Your solicitor will register the interest of your mortgage lender and record you as the new legal owner of the property.

 

"your solicitor will register the interest of your mortgage lender"

 

Exactly as I previously posted

 

Yes Mark, I am Bones

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still using "tried and tested" methods but they are not working

 

Hi Ya........ we were advised you were looking in.....Welcome.......tell your friends, family, associates, your neighbours...the man on the street.....the press.....tell everyone you come into contact with that which you have learnt here.....

 

I could not have made your point more clearly myself.....so....Here, Here.......

 

The current relied upon 'tried and tested' methods are not 'working'......They merely cover over the REALITY......and that is.....When you 'MORTGAGE' you affectively DISPOSE of the Legal and Beneficial Interest in your Estate......that means you are essentially paying and maintaining the house for the Lender......that's not what borrowers bargained for....and fortunately it is not what the legislator intended either....

 

We learnt that by virtue of the LRA 2002.....the legislator on noting that Lenders have been taking the proverbial.......and so since then no borrower has power to 'mortgage' only power to secure indebtedness.........

 

We learnt that if the deed is only signed by you....then it is VOID..... your lender will have NO DEFENCE.....

 

This will be so, even if you took the loan out over 400 years ago....

 

Check your Deed......has your Lender done you the honour of executing it?

 

I hear you when you say you have 28 days to put in a Defence.....The court will be ever so glad you found this thread....You will assist them give your lender short shift if they have not executed the deed.... : )

 

Please...... make my day and tell me your deed is only signed by you....

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

A snippet from the Law Society

 

http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/for-the-public/common-legal-issues/buying-a-home/

 

 

Completion

 

This is the final stage in the conveyancing process when your solicitor hands over the money to the seller and the keys are released to you. Your solicitor will pay the stamp duty land tax and Land Registry fees on your behalf. Your solicitor will register the interest of your mortgage lender and record you as the new legal owner of the property.

 

"your solicitor will register the interest of your mortgage lender"

 

Exactly as I previously posted

 

Ben

 

Thanks for this......Are you looking to push the blame on the Borrowers solicitor to say......it is the Borrowers Solicitors fault that the Lender did not execute the Deed??

 

Are you saying that the Lender will come into court and try to look to the Borrowers Solicitor for redress?

 

ummmmmm, that would be an interesting outcome:lol:

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have to read the deed for myself first, as many include a reference to further advances.

 

Some will say 'this deed is also used to secure further advances'

 

In addition Some will also say that the lender is not obligated to provide a further advance.

 

The wording is of paramount importance.

 

To give you a specific answer, the answer would have to be based upon a specific mortgage deed, that I have read for myself.

 

Also remember that the HMLR practice guide also includes another method by which further advances are accepted.

 

Ben

 

On the other thread...you were quick to advise that it is only if the mortgage deed makes reference to a further advance that the lender has to execute it.......are you having second thoughts??

 

I do wish you would do as we do.....which is to make the distinction between the formalities required by HMLR for an 'approved form of charge' and what statute (that's the Legislator) says...the legislator says that the borrower must sign and the lender must execute the Deed.......

 

Try to refrain from looking to confuse discerning consumers....we pay and contribute to the CaG.....we do not do that so that you can come and try to misguide us.....

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew you would be along soon lol

 

Not that you guys aren't on top of things without me : )

 

I can see all are well focused.......and MUST remain so.

 

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ya........ we were advised you were looking in.....Welcome.......tell your friends, family, associates, your neighbours...the man on the street.....the press.....tell everyone you come into contact with that which you have learnt here.....

 

I could not have made your point more clearly myself.....so....Here, Here.......

 

The current relied upon 'tried and tested' methods are not 'working'......They merely cover over the REALITY......and that is.....When you 'MORTGAGE' you affectively DISPOSE of the Legal and Beneficial Interest in your Estate......that means you are essentially paying and maintaining the house for the Lender......that's not what borrowers bargained for....and fortunately it is not what the legislator intended either....

 

We learnt that by virtue of the LRA 2002.....the legislator on noting that Lenders have been taking the proverbial.......and so since then no borrower has power to 'mortgage' only power to secure indebtedness.........

 

We learnt that if the deed is only signed by you....then it is VOID..... your lender will have NO DEFENCE.....

 

This will be so, even if you took the loan out over 400 years ago....

 

Check your Deed......has your Lender done you the honour of executing it?

 

I hear you when you say you have 28 days to put in a Defence.....The court will be ever so glad you found this thread....You will assist them give your lender short shift if they have not executed the deed.... : )

 

Please...... make my day and tell me your deed is only signed by you....

 

Apple

 

hello apple, my deed is signed by me and the witnessed signature is signed with a solicitor company stamp underneath so there are 2 signatures on my deed, does this mean I cannot apply to the chamber?

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL that's the point we ARE FOCUSED and that's the problem for them, may be some people need to redraft their defences to the chamber as looking at it again its not all that much about signing the deed but what is owed lol.

I also note that there are no responds to the question of how 2 cases have been put on hold then??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope no matter what ideas be they fanciful or otherwise are posted on this thread, it remains open at least until after the Property Chamber hearing.

 

It is of paramount importance that the outcome is published in this thread, to ensure no one else seriously considers those ideas.

 

Only then will common sense prevail

 

Yes Mark, I am Bones

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello apple, my deed is signed by me and the witnessed signature is signed with a solicitor company stamp underneath so there are 2 signatures on my deed, does this mean I cannot apply to the chamber?

 

Hi Ya

 

Your signature is required.....the person who witnessed your signature is also required along with their name and address.....that's your part done.....this is the 'solemn form' required in relation to your statutory duty to sign the deed.....

 

Your Lender is also statutorily required to execute the deed......'execution' is said instead of 'sign' for your lender because....the Lender is a Company....they have a duty to execute in accordance with their 'Articles and Memorandum of Association' (Ltd Companies) (Ben...have I said that right??)....and they also have a statutory duty (this is the legal duty) to execute in solemn form ...that's the signature of at least 2 Directors and witnessed...

 

If the space for your Lenders signature is 'blank'......THE DEED IS VOID

 

Please make my day......is the space where your lender is supposed to sign BLANK???

 

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking at a copy of my remortgaged deed ( I do not have a copy of the original mortgage deed) it is a single page and I cannot see any box where the lender signs or where it says lender signature, there are 4 spaces under signature of the borrower with the top box signed by me,the next column has 4 boxes also for signature name and address of each witness, the top box is signed and stamped by a solicitor, there are also 2 stamps from the land registry on the page so no in answer to your question there is no other signature, unless I am missing a page?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking at a copy of my remortgaged deed ( I do not have a copy of the original mortgage deed) it is a single page and I cannot see any box where the lender signs or where it says lender signature, there are 4 spaces under signature of the borrower with the top box signed by me,the next column has 4 boxes also for signature name and address of each witness, the top box is signed and stamped by a solicitor, there are also 2 stamps from the land registry on the page so no in answer to your question there is no other signature, unless I am missing a page?

 

When did you 're-mortgage'....Just state the Year please?

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3746 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...