Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Excuse my ignorance, but this is a genuine question as I did my schooling overseas. Why are children in Britain supplied with breakfast and dinner at school? When I was at school in the sixties school started at 8am until 2.30pm.

Our parents made sure that we had breakfast as we have to get up at 6am to be ready to go to school by about 7.30am as we had to walk to school which was about 2 mile away. Every morning my parents would make us sandwiches to take with us and we also had some fruit like apples, grapes etc.

Our parents never received any child benefits or any benefits of any kind as they were not available. We certainly were not well off and it was a struggle from day to day, but we managed and I had a good upbringing. Here people get various child benefits, but why are all kids also given meals which must cost the state a fortune?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno about breakfast but dinners aren't provided free for ALL pupils only those whose parents are on certain benefits.

For some kids, school meals might be the only meal of the day.

I had free dinners when I was at school, so I'm in support of that provision - I have no issue with funding this!

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno about breakfast but dinners aren't provided free for ALL pupils only those whose parents are on certain benefits.

For some kids, school meals might be the only meal of the day.

I had free dinners when I was at school, so I'm in support of that provision - I have no issue with funding this!

 

I am not knocking it, just wondering why. Why would the school meal be their only meal on that day. What happens on weekends? I am trying to understand why this is happening in a first world country when it was not available in a third world country where I lived where it was needed a lot more. Many kids went to school barefoot, but this did not bother them and we who had shoes never looked down on them as we all got on together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unstable homes? Dysfunctional family, addicted parents. Perhaps they go hungry at the weekend? Maybe only have toast or a cake or a packet of crisps at home. Who knows, it might be a 1st world country but extreme poverty exists, despite what the government spin doctors say. Child poverty in particular, is a bloody crying shame in this day.

children in the UK are living in absolute poverty. Giving them a meal is only the tip of the iceberg.

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unstable homes? Dysfunctional family, addicted parents. Perhaps they go hungry at the weekend? Maybe only have toast or a cake or a packet of crisps at home. Who knows, it might be a 1st world country but extreme poverty exists, despite what the government spin doctors say. Child poverty in particular, is a bloody crying shame in this day.

children in the UK are living in absolute poverty. Giving them a meal is only the tip of the iceberg.

 

If I didn't know better, I would have thought you were referring to a third world country as poverty should not exist in Britain. If we have all this poverty here, why are we sending money to overseas country. Actually why do we have Comic Relief and Red Nose days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I didn't know better, I would have thought you were referring to a third world country as poverty should not exist in Britain. If we have all this poverty here, why are we sending money to overseas country. Actually why do we have Comic Relief and Red Nose days?

 

simple answer our government likes to look after others and not ourselves, even in recession they pay out for other countries with no worry about us lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree with you, leigh. It is absolutely ridiculous to be sending aid to countries which are funding their own nuclear programmes, or space programmes, or where the dictators running the countries have luxury yachts, planes and much more. Over here pensioners have to freeze because the cost of gas and electricity is so high. We are now totally in a situation where the lunatics are running the asylum.

 

As far as school meals are concerned, despite receiving benefits a lot of parents are completely feckless and it is the children who suffer. You only have to look around you in one of the cheaper supermarkets to see hard-faced parents with the trollies full of chips and the nastiest cheap frozen or tinned food - 20 beefburgers for £1, or 'hot dogs' made with mechanically recovered meat, in other words sludge.

 

They will also have 24-packs of beer and then they'll be queueing for 200 cigarettes and rizla papers. It's not that they cannot afford food - they'd just rather buy booze and cigarettes.

 

That is why it is important that these children do get at least one meal a day. They may get nothing at home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some parents don't even go to shops, there are parents who lack parenting skills, others addicted some just don't have the ability to nurture, however there are families who just can't make ends meet, no fags, beer or chips n hotdogs x

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some parents don't even go to shops, there are parents who lack parenting skills, others addicted some just don't have the ability to nurture, however there are families who just can't make ends meet, no fags, beer or chips n hotdogs x

Probably get shot for saying this, but maybe those sort of people need sterilising? Even the parents of the poorest kids at school made sure their children had food first and I mean proper food not churned out garbage. No such thing as supermarkets and ready made foods in those days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received free school meals when I was at primary school. Parents were on a very low income then.

 

Some children may have breakfast at school because of the hours their parents work. I used to do a work placement at a nursery and it wasn't unusual for a child to be dropped off at 8am and then the parents go to work.

 

Not all kids are given these meals for free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...