Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

a little bit confused!


stuggling
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4035 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

... to be monitored as I pay by cash each week.

 

This means that they will check your payments, and if there are no further issues, the case will be withdrawn. Since you now need a licence, this is the easiest way to go. Perhaps ask them to put it in writing for you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the top is visit ref: (this is blank)

my name

Date and time they called 14/11/2012 at 14.40

if I was watching tv: yes

Make of tv: Toshiba

How long owned tv: 11 months

Anything to declare: Yes if you ruin my career I will sue you as you can pay staff £4500.00 (lies)

Allowed into property no refused entry (no I was ready to go on school run)

National insurance number

Do you understand everything said: yes

Signed

There name and signature time of leaving 14.46

 

He discussed all this in public!

 

That's not a summons.

 

That's a TVL178 form, which is what he/she completed on your doorstep.

 

Have you received an actual summons?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have the summons, it on April 10th at a magistrates out of my area.

 

date of summons - 27/02/2013

between 13/10/2012 and 14/11/2012 used s COLOUR television receiver without a license at the above address

contrary to section 363(2) and (4) of the communications act 2003

 

costs

If you are convicted of the offence, an application will be made for costs of no less than £90.00

 

I still have to send of my reply but tv ppl told me that they going to monitor my license and will ask court to so unsure whether need to send a plea of

Link to post
Share on other sites

No my sky was turned off in Sept and my freebies didn't work till Jan 18 as the lead was broke, used a blue ray system to watch on demand

 

So, between the dates stated, you did not watch/record ANY live TV broadcasts, by any means, at your address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see a broken lead being an accepted get out.

 

If he wasn't watching/recording live TV, then he doesn't need an "accepted get out", because he's actually innocent.

 

That's almost the same as saying the aerial was unplugged, not good enough.

 

That is more than good enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ask the court to postpone proceedings as you have exceptional circumstances.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do I ask?

 

If you plead Not Guilty by post (should be one of the forms you already have), then they will automatically set a new date for the hearing - this will be at least 2 weeks later, possibly much more.

 

Between this and the other thread, it seems you have 2 main options:-

 

1. Pay the arrears and carry on with the licence. They have told you that they will withdraw the case if you do this.

 

2. Plead Not Guilty and defend your case. If you are on a limited income, you might be able to get Legal Aid and a Solicitor to help you. If you plead Not Guilty, and are subsequently convicted, the fine may be higher than it would otherwise have been. However, TVL have also been known to withdraw cases where the defendant challenges their flimsy evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the tv license people ask the court for a monitoring what would that mean and do I still get a record

 

Monitoring (of the Cash/DD plan) means that the case will be listed for a hearing, and the TVL prosecutor will tell the Magistrate whether the payments are up to date or not. If not, the case will likely to proceed to a Guilty verdict.

 

If the payments are up to date, the case may be dropped, or be deferred for a further monitoring hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...