Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice needed for my disciplinary hearing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4103 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am a veterinary assistant. This includes some reception work and somecleaning work too. My father’s friend got me the job and I was so grateful forthe experience as it goes alongside my animal management course.

The job as well as assisting on procedures also includes consultations withowners, covering reception, answering phones and cleaning, odd jobs, stickingthe stock shelves etc.

I have a terms and conditions of employment letter that was signed and I havebeen given a handbook.

On Sundays we attend work on a rota basis and to do odd jobs given that itis usually only emergency cases. I was told to come in and clean down treatmentroom 1 & 2 – that was what was on mywork sheet for the day. This, if done correctly would take about 3-4 hours.When I arrived; a girl that I am friendly with in the Reception was there, and Isat with her before starting with my cleaning. There was no supervisor thereand the vet that was there was in a long procedure with another assistant. I amashamed to say that this probably contributed to my decision to stay chattingfor so long.

Today I have received a letter entitled Disciplinary Hearing – stating thefollowing reasons: “Declining standards of work and incident on 23/2/13 whereit has been reported that you sat on reception for approx. 1 hour prior tobeginning your duties despite clocking in on arrival.”

Although I am not sure how they have found out (maybe cctv because the othergirl wouldn’t have said anything as she would be in almost as much trouble asme for chatting for so long)

Advice needed:

Should I take someone with me? Who? The letter states an appropriaterepresentative. What about my Dad? Is that awkward because it is my dad’sfriend

Do you think these sounds like reasonable grounds to let me go? I have neverhad a verbal warning before or any negative comments about my work (onlycomments when I haven’t worn my uniform correctly and followed hygiene procedurescorrectly)

Is the problem that I’ve basically been paid an hour for doing nothing?

Are they allowed to spy on cctv, since that’s how I think they have discoveredme

Link to post
Share on other sites

As youn have only been employed for a short time you dont really have any employment protection and you can be got rid of for almost any reason. there are 2 issues as far as I can see 1 is that you clocked in an hour before you started work and the other declining standard of work, which I would be more concerened about having only been there a short time. You admit to clocking in and spending a long time not working and I think it would be foolish to try and say otherwise, or worry about the CCTV, even if they shouldnt have used it I can see no point in bringing up the legalities of its use as it will only get the employers back up. the declining standards are a different matter are there things that you have to do that you havent been shown how to do correctly? if so you should bring this up, no you Dad wouldnt be an appropriate representative someone like a union steward would be. I think you neeed to listen to what they say, and then say how much you enjoy the job etc etc show that you are willing to learn and apologise for the wasted time (prehaps even offer to make it up if its an issue) No doubt employment experts will be here soon and they will tell you the legalities of the situation but I really do think after such a short period of employment there isnt much you can except apologise and hope its enough to keep your employment,

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The legalities are pretty much that they can just let you go. Apologise and offer to make the time up at a time convenient to them, not you.

 

*ask* if your dad can come with - they can refuse as legally it's a union rep or colleague to accompany.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Declining standards of work' suggests that your work was of a higher quality before. Have you ever been spoken to about your work prior to this?

 

I think at the meeting you have to establish exactly what the issues are which you are being accused of, it seems harsh that they would go straight to a Disciplinary without speaking to you informally beforehand.

 

Regarding the extra hour, I would apologise for this and, yes, possibly offer to make the time up. A couple of questions to establish on this though, the letter says it was 'reported' that on the 23rd Feb that you were chatting for an hour after clocking in - you should find out whether this was discovered after the event, or whether someone was aware at the time, let you chat without saying anything to you, and then reported you. Also, with regards to consistency, was the other person you were chatting to invited to a Disciplinary? Did you clean the room after your chat? You could request that they don't pay you for the hour you spent chatting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Declining standards of work' suggests that your work was of a higher quality before. Have you ever been spoken to about your work prior to this?.

 

yes, she has already posed this - uniform standards and far more seriously, hygeine procedures.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, she has already posed this - uniform standards and far more seriously, hygeine procedures.

 

Yes I have been informally spoken to about my uniform (wearing my own top under logod fleece instead of theirs) and on 2 occasions pulled up for not using hibiscrub upto my elbows)

 

Interesting what someone said about that you would normally expect an informal discussion prior to the hearing. Could they give me a verbal warning for this? Would a discliinary ever result in a verbal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have been there 5 months. They can follow NO PROCEDURE AT ALL and as long as it isn't gender/race discrimination etc, you can be dismissed never mind a warning!

 

Ignore the posters advising you on technicalities. They do not apply here and will only get the employer's back up. Work on your sincere apology.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really dont think that it is the right thing to even ask if your dad can come with you even for moral support, he is involved as it was his friend who got you the job, IMO taking your dad isnt really very professional and also if he is like most dads he will want to say somthing if it seems that you are being critizised and that could do more harm than good, but that is just my opinion.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree with Emmzzi and AB on this, Rachel. I would focus on a very sincere apology, and an offer to make up the time. As Emmzzi has already said, as you've only been there five months, the ball is very much in their court.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finding out exactly what you're being accused of prior to a Disciplinary is hardly a technicality. Likewise, if someone was watching you chat for an hour and didn't say anything at the time and then later reported you, this isn't a technicality, its common sense to bring this up at any hearing.

 

The fact that they've suggested a Disciplinary though, instead of dismissing you, indicates that they hopefully want to discuss the matter with you and give you a chance to improve. When you go to the meeting, approach it positively, if they bring up the points previously raised address them, and emphasise that the job is important to you and you want to improve and are committed to doing so. If there are any mitigating factors, such as someone was aware you were chatting and didn't say anything, bring them up, and say that had you been told to stop talking and do your work, you would have done so. But its fine to apologise as well, its not really acceptable to chat for an hour during working time and I guess you know this. If any points are brought up at the Disciplinary which you haven't been told about before, make sure this is known. So engage with the employer at the meeting, apologise if you feel you are in the wrong, but the most important thing is that you demonstrate that you're committed to improving and that the job is important to you. And yes, a verbal or written warning is entirely possible following the meeting, as is no formal action.

 

But I would advise against going into the meeting grovelling and apologising unreservedly, especially on the advice of people posting on this thread who feel the employee is always in the wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But I would advise against going into the meeting grovelling and apologising unreservedly, especially on the advice of people posting on this thread who feel the employee is always in the wrong.

 

1. sincere apology isn't grovelling, nor is offering to make the time up

2. she is, self admittedly, in the wrong. that is why I feel she is in the wrong - I'm not imagining it, it's via my magic power of reading comprehension!

 

anyway. Rachel, I do hope it has gone ok - updates appreciated!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most important thing is to resolve the problem going forward though, not merely assign blame. So the OP should apologise where she feels it to be necessary, but also mention any mitigating circumstances. Any dialogue, including any apology made, should of course be sincere. But someone who grovels and apologises for everything under the sun because they are frightened for their job will not be sincere, nor will they appear to be so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The outcome of this was that I had a verbal warning for my declining satandard of work.

I had a written warning for fraudelantly clocking in (I.e clocking in then not actually working for 1 hour)

This happened in the same meeting.

I am on my best behaviour now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

Thank you for letting us know. :) Did you say what the guys suggested?

 

Anyway, whatever you did worked and I should imagine you're relieved. I'm pleased you have a second chance and hope it works out for you.

 

My best, HB

  • Confused 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a disciplinary hearing update meeting 4 weeks from the date of the hearing. I agreed to be monitored for 6 weeks and meet up with my manager again to review my progress. This is more about my work standard/ attitude / hygiene than what happened with my clocking in incident.

 

They have also sent me on a course about vetinary hygiene / public health. they paid for me to do this £250 so i didn' think they were wanting to get rid of me

 

Since then the following has happened

- I failed to properly dispose of some waste (I forgot)

- I failed to complete an assessment correctly and my supervisor had to redo it

 

I have had veral 'dressing downs' for both and my manager write on my worksheet that leaving the waste in a bag on the clinic floor was discusting BUT I haven't had any official verbal (i.e with a letter to go with it) or written warnings.

 

Can they save this stuff up to mention at the review and sack me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really, the aim of the 6 weeks of monitoring is to help with performance improvement, not to allow evidence to be gathered to justify sacking you.

 

It sounds from the fact that they sent you on a course that they do intend keeping you, but it probably depends on whether they see what they regard as an 'improvement' over the 6 week period.

 

Regarding the disposal of waste, this was a mistake, and I think you should apologise for this and try your best not to do the same again. Regarding the assessment, it depends what your supervisor had to do, whether it was some minor adjustments or a complete redoing.

 

Everyone makes mistakes, if this exercise is being done fairly its aim should be to highlight what instances are unacceptable and allow you the chance to avoid repeating them. I think if you can demonstrate some improvement over the 6 week period it would help. You might also want to speak informally to your manager, say that you're glad of the opportunity and are committed to succeeding in the role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not following hygine again procedures again? you seriously need to check and double check everything at the moment, although your employer may not want to get rid of you this is an area that is really important and could let you down even if other things are ok.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not following hygine again procedures again? you seriously need to check and double check everything at the moment, although your employer may not want to get rid of you this is an area that is really important and could let you down even if other things are ok.

 

Absolutely, this area is crucial due the potential seriousness if something goes wrong. Check everything, go above and beyond the requirements of the procedures if necessary, and request feedback, maybe ask your manager on a Friday if they were happy with things during the week. If you demonstrate you really want to succeed in the role this will help your cause a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's because I am so nervous and worried i am treading on eggshells and making mistakes

 

So can they save these things up or not, as 2 people have said 2 different things.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...