Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA Credit Card Penalty Charges, Late Fees, Overlimit Fees


Jigsawbitmissing
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4138 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

 

I had an MBNA Credit Card in the early 90's. I have recently started reading about reclaiming the "penalty charges" and looked through some old paperwork I have. I have managed to find a few statements where these "fees" were applied.

 

I have sent them a SAR and was wondering if they will come back with all the statements from the start date of the account or whether I will be told that they don't have them. I should state that I am still paying the debt off to a 3rd party to this date.

 

I hope someone can help me with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Await the SAR and see what they send you. They may claim that they have no data beyond six years although we believe that they do.

 

I doubt very much that you will get all statements back to the early 90's though.

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm.

 

you wont get penalty charges of that era out of MBNA

 

of all the CCC's the worse

 

none as far as i know are coughing beyond 6yrs without a fight in court.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm.

 

you wont get penalty charges of that era out of MBNA

 

of all the CCC's the worse

 

none as far as i know are coughing beyond 6yrs without a fight in court.

 

dx

 

Hello dx,

 

I presume a fight in court means fees and also end up paying their costs if I lose?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello dx,

 

I presume a fight in court means fees and also end up paying their costs if I lose?

 

Much depends on the value of your claim. If it falls within small claims then there are fees payable for starting proceedings but exposure to the other side's costs is minimal should you lose.

 

I would wait until you get your data, prepare a spreadsheet of claim and then you will know how much the claim is for.

 

If going back further than six years you will rely on S32(1)© Limitations Act.

 

There is no guarantee that the charges in the last six years will be refunded easily...you may still have to fight for them.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Much depends on the value of your claim. If it falls within small claims then there are fees payable for starting proceedings but exposure to the other side's costs is minimal should you lose.

 

I would wait until you get your data, prepare a spreadsheet of claim and then you will know how much the claim is for.

 

If going back further than six years you will rely on S32(1)© Limitations Act.

 

There is no guarantee that the charges in the last six years will be refunded easily...you may still have to fight for them.

 

Thank you kindly again ims.

 

Just a thought, would the ombudsman look into these types of claims or would it have to go to court due to the statute of limitations?

 

I will of course heed your advice and wait for any paperwork that might be supplied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

fos are not generally the best people to go to regarding charges claims. They tend to think tat the OFT decision on charges is the one to adhere to i.e that £12 is acceptable.

 

It isn't....the OFT simply said they would not investigate charges over £12 but only a court could decide on a test of fairness.

 

As the charges are not a true pre-estimate of the costs incurred by the lender then they are a penalty and can be reclaimed.

 

Do some more reading around the bank forums and you will get up to speed on why they are a penalty, the reclaim process and the interest rates than can be used.

 

Also have a look at the success stories in the various bank forums.

 

If a charge was incurred more than six years ago then fos will be even less interested.

 

This is something best done by yourself using the courts.

 

Please be aware that although some lenders cave in before a court hearing, if you are going to pursue this you need to work on the basis that you will need to issue proceedings and will need to appear in front of a judge to put your case.

 

The key is preparation, preparation and more preparation.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

fos are not generally the best people to go to regarding charges claims. They tend to think tat the OFT decision on charges is the one to adhere to i.e that £12 is acceptable.

 

It isn't....the OFT simply said they would not investigate charges over £12 but only a court could decide on a test of fairness.

 

As the charges are not a true pre-estimate of the costs incurred by the lender then they are a penalty and can be reclaimed.

 

Do some more reading around the bank forums and you will get up to speed on why they are a penalty, the reclaim process and the interest rates than can be used.

 

Also have a look at the success stories in the various bank forums.

 

If a charge was incurred more than six years ago then fos will be even less interested.

 

This is something best done by yourself using the courts.

 

Please be aware that although some lenders cave in before a court hearing, if you are going to pursue this you need to work on the basis that you will need to issue proceedings and will need to appear in front of a judge to put your case.

 

The key is preparation, preparation and more preparation.

 

Much Appreciated again Ims - will keep reading the threads, which is all I am doing at the moment!

 

The Forum is very addictive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...