Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2nd class stamp only , get free proof of posting from any PO counter dx  
    • Hi,  It has been a long time but I have had confirmation claim will proceed to hearing in roughly 1 months time.  I was wondering if anyone could advise on defence please.  A few questions I have are: 1) I didn't notify VCS that I was not the driver of the vehicle and the judge may look negatively on this point.  I did not receive any direction in correspondence from VCS  that I should inform them if I was not the driver and that was going to be the foundation for may argument on this point. 2) The vehicle is stopped at a zebra crossing.  Based on the images from VCS for around 10 seconds.  At that time there is someone standing near the zebra crossing and someone else enters my vehicle.  I was going to raise the point that stopping at a zebra crossing when someone is standing near it is to be expected.  I was also going to ask the question how you can have a no stopping zone when there are zebra crossings where the driver is required to stop. 3) The no stopping zone is clearly signposted, however, no drop off or pickup is not clearly signposted with one small sign at the zebra crossing, parallel to the road and on the passengers side.  I was going to challenge that no-drop off or pickup is clearly signposted.  4) VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet.  It covered 1) Claimant not being in a position to state if the Defendant was the driver at the time.  2) No evidence that claimant's contract with landowner supersedes byelaws & signage isn't legally binding contract. 3) No contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on speculative charge. I am interested to know if anyone has had success or been unsuccessful with this 'generic' defence. 5) If I should submit an updated defence to the court based on questions 1, 2 & 3.  Or if it is better to only raise these points in court? Thanks.  Any guidance would be appreciated  
    • I honestly don't know, Baz. In addition what I don't  understand (from that pamphlet) is this: The s88 criteria are quite clear and don't need a medical professional to interpret them . The one most relevant to his topic says that an application is not a "qualifying application" if a relevant disability has been declared. The problem with the word "may" is how does the applicant establish whether me "may" driver under s88 when he has not complied with its conditions? I don't know the answer to that either. But to further muddy the waters, the pamphlet says this (about : But the s88 statute says absolutely nothing like that at all. It simply says that if you have declared a relevant disability s88 does not apply. The DVLA pamphlet is simply confusing as far as I can see. That's actually my opinion and that's what I would stick to if it was me making the application. But I'll seek a few opinions from others over the next couple of days.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK inherited debt being chased overseas


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4164 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Greetings!

 

I havent got any sleep for weeks since the Lloyds TSB is chasing me.

 

The story goes as following (pardon my broken English, I live in eastern parts of EU):

 

About 5 months ago a close relative of mine died.

I was the sole inheritor of her property,

consisting of an apartment and several loans.

 

I have taken care of 2 out of 3 debts.

The third one is Lloyds TSB and the sum is 3000 GBP.

 

Since one of those 3 loans pretty much crippled me financially (I am still quite young) and the apartment is, well, everything I have!

 

Lloyds got my address through solicitor, who took care of the inheritance process.

 

By the local law inheritance goes as following by my best understanding:

Inheritor notices the solicitor

-> solicitor notifies all the local banks to get information about outstanding debts and assets,

as well as gathers other information about assets.

(this is the part where I did wrong - to my knowledge,

she had some assets held by Lloyds so I listed it down and solicitor contacted them about me being the benefactor)

 

-> 30 days is given for other relatives to claim their part of the inheritance, if they have any legal reason to get anything.

 

-> benefactor is notified about the debts and assets and the case is closed if there is no dispute.

 

The benefactor is obliged to cover all debts marked up in the documents then received, as well as any new ones that surface within a year.

 

About a month after receiving the mentioned paperwork, I got a formal letter from Lloyds,

claiming that my relative had a debt (suspiciously round amount?) with them

and I should notify them if there are sufficient funds left from the estate to cover it.

 

Well, there is the apartment but selling that would mean me being homeless, since the market value is quite low and I can not afford a rental.

 

Enclosed was also a quite massive form, called the Assets and Liabilities Form,

that demanded quite a lot of sensitive information, including bank acc. numbers of the deceaseds' other bank accounts,

list of valuables, contact information of other benefactors and so on.

I decided to ignore that letter,

 

about 3 months have passed and I received another letter, this time in a more discrete envelope.

The letter again asks me to confirm if there are sufficient funds blah blah

and they can not drop the account until I have returned completed assets and liabilities form,

which, as stated on the form itself in veeeery fine print, is pretty much a legally binding contract

- if I fail to inform the bank accurately about ALL the assets the deceased had and the bank finds out,

I have agreed that the bank should take legal action against me.

 

quoth the letter:

We would remind you that if the late XXXXXX had any assets then there is a legal requirement for outstanding debts to be settled before monies are paid to family or friends.

 

To sum things up:

I am certainly unable to pay that 3000 quid.

I would like to avoid responding to them. That would be the last line of defence for me.

 

Making the inventory of the deceaseds' assets can be only handled by a solicitor and before the inheritance is finalized.

 

Furthermore, asking about bank details should be a violation of information protection laws in my opinion.

 

But telling them that could mean that the debt could be handled by local inheritance law, meaning that I most certainly must pay it.

 

The latter letter seemed quite computer generated. Signed by Mrs. XXXXX, Centre Manager. Scare tactic?

The deceased was not UK national, neither am I.

 

Long story short, how long would the ignoring tactic hold and how much chance could I actually stand avoiding that debt? I am quite scared here, I just started independent life.

Any help is appreciated!

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where is the inherited apartment ? UK or elsewhere ?

 

Where was the Lloyds/TSB taken out ? What it a secured or unsecured loan ? Was it solely in your relatives name, without any other person as a guarantor ? ( Secured means using property as security and unsecured obviously means the loan was not connected with property acting a security)

Were you noted as executor of your relatives estate following their passing ? Did they leave a will stating this ?

 

If you were not an executor and were not party to any of the loans or financial arrangements your relative had, then I am not sure you had any responsibility to deal with the debts. There would also not be any responsibility on your part to complete any of the forms sent to you by Lloyds/TSB.

 

I would suggest that you just write back to Lloyds/TSB saying that you have no understanding of what they are writing about, that the deceaseds estate is still to be resolved and that it may be sometime before you are aware of what the exact situation is.

 

But can you clarify the situation by answering the above.

 

Based on the limited information in your post, I don't think you need to worry too much. It may be the case that Lloyds/TSB will have to accept losing the money and you have no responsibility for it.

Edited by unclebulgaria67

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a will, stating me as an executor. I have no other details about the loan. Could be a [problem], could be an unsecured loan (most likely). The apartment is not in UK, my relative only worked there and had two bank accounts. The other was at Barclays, I have not heard from them.

Lloyds gave me only the loan acc. number and the sum of 3000GBP in the letters, no further details.

Edited by cptncold
Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a will, stating me as an executor. I have no other details about the loan. Could be a [problem], could be an unsecured loan (most likely). The apartment is not in UK, my relative only worked there and had two bank accounts. The other was at Barclays, I have not heard from them.

 

Ok, assuming that your deceased relative did not own any assets in the UK and that the Lloyds/TSB loan was therefore unsecured, was there are other money or other financial assets left in the UK ?

 

Lloyds/TSB cannot touch your inherited property outside of the UK. It was an unsecured loan and therefore there was the risk that they would not be repaid, if there was no money or Insurance to cover the amount outstanding.

 

Did your relative have any life or other Insurance that would have covered any debts on their passing ? It may be worth looking at your relatives bank accounts to see whether they were paying any regular Insurance premiums for life cover.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

To my understanding, there was approximately 300GBP at Lloyds. There was no insurance to my knowledge, what is quite limited. I have no access to her bank records or anything. Only piece of information I have is that she had allegedly that loan and 300 quid. My guess is that there is nothing more, she was on the verge of going bankrupt.

 

EDIT: Quoth the first letter: "Could you please respond and acknowledge our claim". Yup. I think they know they don't have ground to stand on and are trying to trick me out of my money. But I could be wrong.

Edited by cptncold
Link to post
Share on other sites

To my understanding, there was approximately 300GBP at Lloyds. There was no insurance to my knowledge, what is quite limited. I have no access to her bank records or anything. Only piece of information I have is that she had allegedly that loan and 300 quid. My guess is that there is nothing more, she was on the verge of going bankrupt.

 

I would write to Lloyds/TSB stating something like this.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Reference no..................................... Deceased ..........................................................................................

 

Thank you for your letter dated xxxxxxxxx.

 

Unfortunately, I have very limited knowledge of the deceased financial position at the time of their passing and therefore cannot complete any forms that you have sent in regard to their financial position i.e assets/liabilities. As far as I am led to believe, they had £300 left in their Lloyds account and nothing else to cover any unsecured debts in the UK. I also do not believe they had any form of Insurance to cover any liabilities on their passing.

 

Sorry that I cannot help you any further with this, as I simply do not have the information that you are seeking.

 

Yours faithfully.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember that as Executor you do have a responsibility for finding out the exact financial position of your deceased relative and of drawing up an account of their assets/liabilities. You also have a legal responsibility of making sure the wishes of your relative, as detailed in their will are carried out.

 

You do not however have any responsibility for paying their unsecured debts, if there is no money in the estate to pay them.

 

Have a read through this guide from Citizens Advice.

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/england/relationships_e/relationships_death_and_wills_e/dealing_with_the_financial_affairs_of_someone_who_has_died.htm

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would also call their bluff.

 

send them an sar.

 

i bet bottom dollar they will reply that you are not entitled to the information!

 

the other thing will be the fact that i bet PENALTY charges are involved here too.

 

no chance Lloyds.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx is right on this a SAR is the way to go, you are not personally liable for the debts, if there are no funds left in the estate that's tough on the banks.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a will, stating me as an executor. I have no other details about the loan. Could be a [problem], could be an unsecured loan (most likely). The apartment is not in UK, my relative only worked there and had two bank accounts. The other was at Barclays, I have not heard from them.

Lloyds gave me only the loan acc. number and the sum of 3000GBP in the letters, no further details.

 

You will need to find out the situation with the Barclays account. To do this, you may have to contact the Solicitor who dealt with your relatives estate or come to the UK with all the relevant documents including something to ID yourself, so they can release the information to you.

 

You are probably best to contact the Solicitor in the UK to find out the situation. If there are very few UK assets and you do not sign to pay the Solicitors fees, I suspect that they might not wish to do much work for you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays account was closed by a close friend of the deceased. I suppose there were no outstanding debts or funds left. But to my best knowledge there is no other assets remaining than the 300 in Lloyds and the apartment, already written to my name.

I'll wait for another letter from Lloyds and see if they talk themselves further more in. Something just doesn't smell right about this whole thing. Then I'll demand a SAR. Anything else I could do to call on their bulls*it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays account was closed by a close friend of the deceased. I suppose there were no outstanding debts or funds left. But to my best knowledge there is no other assets remaining than the 300 in Lloyds and the apartment, already written to my name.

I'll wait for another letter from Lloyds and see if they talk themselves further more in. Something just doesn't smell right about this whole thing. Then I'll demand a SAR. Anything else I could do to call on their bulls*it?

 

No Lloyds will only have sent you a standard letter, as they do to all executors. They will have no knowledge of your relatives financial situation, other than what they could find out from the credit reference agencies.

 

You would be best to write to them, as previously advised, to state that you are only aware of the Lloyds account which had about £300.

 

If you don't write to them, then they will send more standard letters.

 

Although your relative died in the UK, you are probably best to get advice from the country where they owned the apartment. I am guessing that you will now have to register the change of ownership into your name and will require the relevant documents to do this. So you will need the UK issued death certificate, will and grant of probate.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I live in the apartment and the ownership was changed to my name 2 months after the death.

 

If there is nothing remaining in the UK and the apartment ownership has already been dealt with then there does not appear anything left to do. But I would suggest that you just write to Lloyds as suggested, just so that they are aware of the situation. They should then write off the loan, as they have no chance of making a recovery.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Inland Revenue has stated that my relative owes them ~700 GBP. I say- lets play ball! I am going to contact Lloyds first, stating that there is an outstanding debt with IRS too and they'd better use the 300GBP she had there to partially cover the debt before I contact the IRS, who in my opinion has more right to the money, being goverment institution and whatnot but at the same time I write IRS that there is 3000GBP outstanding at Lloyds, thus proving that there really is nothing left. Lets see how it turns out...the second debt might just be my ticket out of both :peep:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I plan to just state the obvious to them - there is nothing left but debt :) I might mention that there is 300GBP in Lloyds, what they want to partially repay the loan. Let's see how those two get along...

 

EDIT: Any suggestions how I could handle this situation better?

Edited by cptncold
Link to post
Share on other sites

I plan to just state the obvious to them - there is nothing left but debt :) I might mention that there is 300GBP in Lloyds, what they want to partially repay the loan. Let's see how those two get along...

 

EDIT: Any suggestions how I could handle this situation better?

 

As executor it was your responsibility to have drawn up accounts showing assets and liabilities that were available to meet any debts.

 

Suggest that you write to advise IRS of the financial situation and that the only money available is £300 with Lloyds (provide them with sortcode and account number) and that you believe Lloyds may have taken this amount to offset a loan debt held by Lloyds. Send IRS a copy of the death certificate if not already sent to them.

 

Then see how they respond. If there is no money to pay them or only this £300 with Lloyds, they will have to fight Lloyds for it or write this tax debt off.

 

Did you handle the grant of probate or did the Solicitor do this ? If the Solicitor dealt with it, then provide the IRS with the Solicitors contact details.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The IRS was notified and received the death certificate about half a year ago, week after the death. They really don't seem to be interested in the grant of probate (solicitor did it, as the local law demands), only local banks and institutions demanded it. Letting IRS and Lloyds aka the big boys fight over the pennies sounds both fun and practical, although I wish that Lloyds would just take the damned 300 and write the loan off since if all goes sour, the IRS debt is far less devastating for me to pay out of my pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...