Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Turn casual moments into unforgettable dates – choose the best casual dating site! Actual Girls [URL=https://matchnow.life]Super casual Dating[/URL]
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Boyfriend caught drink driving.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Those figures say that no legal rep is required. No matter how educated in the law, they can't get you off drink driving. The only thing open could be a technicality, do your think all the procedure was done correctly ?

I don't know.. Anyway he is not planning to get off.. He is planning to plead guilty because he is drinking and driving.. For that do we need a solicitor or just go and plead??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on personal experience of facing a ban for driving offences once or twice (although not for drink driving), I would add the following.

 

He should be prepared to apologise to the magistrates for the offence and explain how the mistake was made. He should leave the magistrates in no doubt that it was a mistake and that it will not be repeated. He should be able to explain how a ban will impact him - they will ask this anyway.

 

Standing up and saying this in court will be a tough thing to do and he will probably be nervous. Personally, sitting in the public gallery for the preceeding cases settles my nerves a bit and allows me to get a feel for what sort of mood the magistrates are in.

 

In my experience, they are helpful and supportive - their purpose is to get to the truth and they will help with questions and support for that purpose. The Clerk to the Court is a "good guy". You will need to find him to "log in" when you get there.

 

It is entirely likely that he will get 12 months. Being able to say his piece will reduce the risk that he gets something more severe due to the "judges lottery".

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL - I did mean 12 months ban and not jail...

 

I was handed down a judgment once for non payment of fines...

"You are sentenced to prison for 42 days...

long pause...

suspended"

 

I will remember that moment for the rest of my life. Needless to say, the fine got paid as agreed...

 

Good luck with it. And please let us know how you got on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

2 small things since I don't think it's been mentioned:

 

1) Make sure he goes suited and booted.

2) He doesn't drive by himself to the court, the ban takes effect immediately and he won't be able to drive home.

Apologies for the formatting in my posts, I do put paragraphs in but the forum removes them for some reason :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those figures say that no legal rep is required. No matter how educated in the law, they can't get you off drink driving. The only thing open could be a technicality, do your think all the procedure was done correctly ?

Get off on a technicality!? Sorry to be so blunt but if you "do the crime then do the time" I don't believe it should be imprisoment but should be harsh such as a year's ban and the points do stay on your licence for 11 years. If people were "getting off" all the time then there going to think that weren't so bad and won't worry about doing it next time. It's not as if there's not enough advertisement about drink driving. I wont get done because I drink zero if I'm going to drive and if I do drink won't drive at all, no matter what quantity. Your judgement is impaired and you are a risk to the public. Do let us know how he got on yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get off on a technicality!? Sorry to be so blunt but if you "do the crime then do the time" I don't believe it should be imprisoment but should be harsh such as a year's ban and the points do stay on your licence for 11 years. If people were "getting off" all the time then there going to think that weren't so bad and won't worry about doing it next time. It's not as if there's not enough advertisement about drink driving. I wont get done because I drink zero if I'm going to drive and if I do drink won't drive at all, no matter what quantity. Your judgement is impaired and you are a risk to the public. Do let us know how he got on yesterday.

 

Nobody here is arguing that!

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody here is arguing that!

 

Agreed.

 

@rippedofflondon

But the point of 'technicallities' is there is a set formula and procedure to be followed - just as rules for the motorist.

Step outside the rules knowingly and the motorist has little to complain about.

So the same must apply to the 'other side' who are equally bound to 'get it right within the rules for them'.

 

Otherwise UK would descend into the totally corrupt systems that sadly prevail where I live, where "you can buy anything" from any minor official, traffic cop, judge and upwards. (In fact to be a Judge require no great legal experience and some just buy their appointment - not cheap, but the opportunities for gain are endless and the list of hopeful applicants grows, just like to be a traffic cop with a basic salary of £100/month in one of the most expensive capital cities in the World (Speaks volumes!!).

 

I know which system I prefer - keep to the rules and technicallities and avoid corrupt summary justice.

 

For all that upsets me now with the country I grew up in, the lack of everyday corruption and sticking to 'rules' is something I miss and we should treasure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

sorry for not updating the result asap. but actually i updated it as soon as we got the verdict but it is not showing on the comments.

he got 6 months ban and 420£ fine including court fee and all..:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi crem. i am not sure how they gave it. he pleaded guilty and gave the reason for his driving in such a state. we took the hospitalisation sheet of my mom and my own medical report.

It is actually 8 months but he took a safety course so it is 6mnths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi crem. i am not sure how they gave it. he pleaded guilty and gave the reason for his driving in such a state. we took the hospitalisation sheet of my mom and my own medical report.

It is actually 8 months but he took a safety course so it is 6mnths.

 

Are you sure? Minimum tariff is 12 month ban but if offered the rehab course it reduces it down to 9 (on completion).

 

I have never heard of an 8 month ban for D&D.

 

Please Note

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's unusual, but if the court finds special reasons not to impose the full 12 month ban it can choose to impose a shorter one, or even no ban at all. Special reasons must relate to the offence itself and not to the offender (so hardship that would be caused by a ban can't be a special reason) but beyond that the court has a fair amount of latitude to decide what is a special reason. Common examples would be spiked drinks or other inadvertent consumption of alcohol, an unexpected reaction to medication, driving a very short distance, especially if there was little risk of coming into contact with other road users, or driving because of a genuine emergency. A sympathetic bench might consider going to comfort a hysterical mother in law who's just lost her father to be a genuine emergency, and knock a bit off the ban for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good stuff - he did the right thing holding hands up and apologising for it - always the best approach in these circumstances and hopefully a lesson learnt. The only safe approach when driving is NO alcohol at all, but I am sure he knows this now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...