Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I submitted a N9B and I scanned it here.  I just found the n244 form. No, I have not filled that out. Does that mean that they will rule in Erudio's favour now? My court case is on Tue so if I fill the form in now and send it both to the court and Drydens they will not accept it I fear.  I had no idea that I had to fill in another form as I already submitted my defence and Drydens have not addressed the Remediation issues so I thought my defence still stands, They just provided evidence they sent the deferral letters and the default letter but that's not proof I got them.  Not sure what to do now... DEFENCESARAHSWOES00001.PDF
    • twill be even better tonight and already the KP is predicted further south than last night. incredible pictures from canada and australia on glendale . so big to me it was out of view to ne camera. gonna try a drone tonight too. dx
    • n244 is the imp one please we need everything inc exhibits but not statements. dx
    • the first dn was void as it only gave 14 days not accounting for postage time so you didnt get it with 14 days remaining hence the 2019 one. pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] .............. there is not harm in filing our DN late SB defence now too. alternative whereby claimant intimates SB date=defaulted date and that has been registered months after the last payment . 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on dd/mm/yyyy.  2.The date last payment made was the dd/mm/yyyy   3.The Default Notice was issued dd/mm/yyyy and served several months after the initial breach thus the cause of action delayed by X months and the Limitations period prolonged to 6 years and X months which in effect allows the creditor to stop time running and the creditor having effective control of when a limitation period begins or even starts to run.  4.Therefore the Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any true cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.  5.The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £x or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car insurance claim HELP


nikkipn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Could someone please try and help me understand claims procedure as I am getting pushed from pillar to post by both insurance companies. OK here is my problem. My partner is covered by her fully comp insurance to drive any car with the owners permission. While our car was in the garage for it's mot renewal we borrowed my mothers car for a couple of days, thinking, as my partner is covered by our insurance to drive any car this would not be a problem. Whilst out in the car we hit ice and ended up rolling the car onto it's roof, luckily we both received minor injuries. The police and ambulance were called and we were taken to hospital for treatment. My mother called her insurance to report the accident and to get the car recovered within 4hrs of the accident happening, but due to shock and waiting for a ref number from the police it was 6 days later before my partner got round to contacting her insurance company. Now while trying to make a claim we get told by our insurance company that it is my mother who should submit the claim from her insurers and my mothers insurers are saying it is down to our insures to make the claim. We have contacted both insurance companies 3 or 4 times and neither will help us sort this out. Please anyone out there can someone shed some light on what we should do as this is really getting me down and my mother who is disabled is left without a car

 

Thank you in advance for any help offered Nikki

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think only third party insurance would be in place so you cannot claim for damages to the car, only for third party damages i.e. another car.

 

Correct. Driving other cars extension is third party liability only cover. To be covered for the damage to the mothers car, you would have needed to be added as additional drivers on the mothers policy. If you did not do this, then the mothers Insurers will not be able to consider any claim.

 

The only thing you will be covered for under the partners policy if they were driving, is damage to a third party or their property. So if the car hit any third party or their property, your partners Insurers will only look at that.

 

So you are not covered for damage to the car under either policy and you will have to pay for the repairs to the car out of your own pockets. Next time you borrow a car, either get the car owner to add you to their Insurance or arrange separate temporary Insurance. Do not rely on any third party only driving other cars extension.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct. Driving other cars extension is third party liability only cover. To be covered for the damage to the mothers car, you would have needed to be added as additional drivers on the mothers policy. If you did not do this, then the mothers Insurers will not be able to consider any claim.

 

The only thing you will be covered for under the partners policy if they were driving, is damage to a third party or their property. So if the car hit any third party or their property, your partners Insurers will only look at that.

 

So you are not covered for damage to the car under either policy and you will have to pay for the repairs to the car out of your own pockets. Next time you borrow a car, either get the car owner to add you to their Insurance or arrange separate temporary Insurance. Do not rely on any third party only driving other cars extension.

Thank you both for you're swift reply. Usually my mother has any driver over 25 on her insurance, but for some reason when renewing her policy earlier this year she forgot to have it added. Have learned a massive lesson from this and thankyou once again for the swift replies Nikki
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...