Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is there anything you can do after repossession?


SBucks
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3937 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've jus found out that my best friends house was repossessed yesterday.

 

I'm still waiting to get to the bottom of the issue but the following is what I know:

Mortgage is with Skipptons

He has missed the last 4 consecutive payments

He had missed payments before and caught up

He has missed payments, been to court and was grated a stay order if he payed a set amount which he did

His mortgage payments were £600 but after the court stay order they increased them to £800 (not sure why yet)

He had plenty of notice that this was going to happen but dug his head in the sand, didn't ask for help, didn't speak to the Mortgage company and tried to resolve his issues with beer

He is currently unemployed (own farming business recently failed)

He has just got divorced but has joint custody of his 18 month old daughter for 3 days/2 nights per week

All of his possessions are still in his house and there is a notice on the door saying he has 7 days from yesterday to contact them to arrange removal of his possessions

Council have said there is nothing they can do for him as the child care allowance for his daughter is not in his name

 

 

Couple of key questions:

If he grants me authority to speak to his mortgage company do you think there is any hope of getting him back in his house if I pay the outstanding arrears?

Has anyone ever managed to get back in their home after the house has been repossessed?

 

I'm pretty savvy with financial matters but this is an area that I really don't know much about (and I hope that I never have to learn for myself! - off to touch some wood).

 

Any suggestions or ideas would be very much appreciated!

 

Thanks

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're a nice friend - it's a shame he didn't approach you for help beforehand. Maybe if he gets into difficulties in the future he will know where to turn straight away.

 

Yes, if you clear the arrears in total, he stands a good chance of getting back into the house. This is a negotiation that has to take place with the mortgagee though, it is not a court issue. Courts have very limited powers to allow people back into their houses once possession has taken place (limited, not none at all). So your first step would be to get him to give the mortgagee permission to discuss his account with you (if you are going to do it on the phone, it is best if he is present, speaks to them first, tells them that he wants them to discuss it with you, and then hands the phone over). You will need to prove/show where you got the money from, and show how he is going to manage to pay going forward (you said he is unemployed - if he hasn't already done so he'll need to claim statutory mortgage interest from the DWP - and perhaps ask the mortgagee to change the mortgage from repayment to interest only if it isn't on IO already). They will make a decision based on the information you give them. Most of the time they are often willing to give the mortgagor another chance as all they really want is their money. You may find that the arrears are higher than your friend told you - if so, and you can't afford to repay all of it, then even a 50% reduction should allow them to consider the offer, with the current instalment plus something towards the arrears thereafter to clear them as quickly as possible - at this stage they do not have to consider the case law that the courts have to consider which would mean that the arrears could be paid off over the remaining term of the loan.

 

Do that, and if it's not successful come back and post up what they said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you for your reply.

 

Here is an update on the situation:

We have spoken to the mortgage company and they were adamant that they would not give the property back even if the arrears were paid.

 

I spoke to three people regarding this decision the final one being a senior manager who eventually said that it could be done if certain criteria was met (I explained that without the house my friend has nothing to lose by going bankrupt, while this did not phase the lady on the phone I further explained that the property is in negative equity to at least £35,000 so do think carefully before being inflexible!)

 

Terms of possession:

£7000 areas paid

Proof of employment (signed contract)

Permission to contact new employer

Mortgage to increase to cover costs

 

Following this I then took the unpleasant task of informing his parents to let them know what had happened (they put the deposit down for the house) and further explain his predicament including all other know debts (Circa. £30K).

 

While myself and his parents are/were prepared to cover the arrears and I could sort the employment issue out we made the decision that the house was not worth saving due to the negative equity aspect. We had a valuation done by the people who sold the house to my friend (it was a new build) and they came back with £130K Vs the £152K he bought it for.

 

Our next move is to get his property out of the flat and get him a job. We will then go through the process of making him bankrupt and once he is on his feet again he can make the decision on whether he honours his moral obligation to replay certain debt.

 

Question:

The agents dealing with his flat/repossession have given us until the 1st Dec to arrange a time to get his possessions back (they "had no one free to assist" us entry last week) - However they have stated that no one is allowed inside the property or on the drive way and we are to provide a list of what he wants to remove and they will remove it.

We want EVERYTHING out of there, do we have this right?

 

If so can anyone advise us what statue we should reference?

 

Many thanks

Mark

 

PS. On a positive note, my friend is now on day 6 of being 'dry' and is attending AA meetings every evening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

 

Here is an update on the situation:

We have spoken to the mortgage company and they were adamant that they would not give the property back even if the arrears were paid.

 

I spoke to three people regarding this decision the final one being a senior manager who eventually said that it could be done if certain criteria was met (I explained that without the house my friend has nothing to lose by going bankrupt, while this did not phase the lady on the phone I further explained that the property is in negative equity to at least £35,000 so do think carefully before being inflexible!)

 

Terms of possession:

£7000 areas paid

Proof of employment (signed contract)

Permission to contact new employer

Mortgage to increase to cover costs

 

Following this I then took the unpleasant task of informing his parents to let them know what had happened (they put the deposit down for the house) and further explain his predicament including all other know debts (Circa. £30K).

 

While myself and his parents are/were prepared to cover the arrears and I could sort the employment issue out we made the decision that the house was not worth saving due to the negative equity aspect. We had a valuation done by the people who sold the house to my friend (it was a new build) and they came back with £130K Vs the £152K he bought it for.

 

Our next move is to get his property out of the flat and get him a job. We will then go through the process of making him bankrupt and once he is on his feet again he can make the decision on whether he honours his moral obligation to replay certain debt.

 

Question:

The agents dealing with his flat/repossession have given us until the 1st Dec to arrange a time to get his possessions back (they "had no one free to assist" us entry last week) - However they have stated that no one is allowed inside the property or on the drive way and we are to provide a list of what he wants to remove and they will remove it.

We want EVERYTHING out of there, do we have this right?

 

If so can anyone advise us what statue we should reference?

 

Many thanks

Mark

 

PS. On a positive note, my friend is now on day 6 of being 'dry' and is attending AA meetings every evening.

 

He has the right to take ALL of his belongings - there is no statute covering this. Just ensure that he has sufficient assistance to enable him to remove everything on the appointment day. They cannot prevent him from removing all his stuff on that day. They can, however, prevent more than one person going into the house at a time (they do this because they are afraid that once someone is back inside, they will close the door and squat - this, of course, is completely ridiculous now - and should be pointed out to them - as squatting is now a criminal offence and the police can be called and the person(s) removed forthwith).

 

In any case, ensure you have ample people who can help from the path/roadside to load the stuff into the van whilst someone is inside filling boxes and bringing them to the door. The mortgagee may be more prepared to allow professional movers to come in to pack up everything and remove it, so you might wish to consider speaking to them about that and pointing out that professional movers are not likely to want to squat!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi,

I thought I should add an update to this post to close the chapter so to speak.

 

He did lose the house.

He did get all of his possessions back thanks to us knowing our legal position (as detailed in this thread).

They have not chased him for any of his outstanding debts but this is probably due to them not knowing where he lives.

He did get a job working for me but due to various factors (the main one being a possessive girlfriend who he ended up putting before his job) it only lasted 5 months and with it the best opportunity he will ever have for a well paid job (he would have done £40-£50K in his first year)

He still owes me £1000's and he isn't even keeping up with the £50/Wk he agreed to pay - I probably see him once per month if I'm lucky, the rest of the time he is in the pub or working on a farm

 

 

Anyway, on his behalf I would like to thank everyone who gave their time to respond to the thread.

 

Regards

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but the information given here was incorrect.

Once a property is repossessed the issue of arrears no longer counts. Im sorry your friend lost there place but I hope it means they can move on with their life.

 

You're wrong, and your statement has added absolutely nothing to the thread in terms of usefulness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Daniella

 

It's very, very rare for someone to get their home back following a lawful possession order being granted by the courts and then executed by bauliffs. As indicated in post #2, which quite clearly states in this person's friend's case, getting back into the property relied on negotiations with the mortgagee. Getting his belongings back was another matter - and he was perfectly entitled to everything he owned within the property - and quite rightly was able to get those things.

 

OP, you were a lovely friend and it's a shame your mate couldn't be bothered to see what he was throwing away by not taking the help you offered him and sticking to whatever terms were agreed. Unfortunately for some people things get so bad they can't see the good, so you may find that once your mate is finished licking his wounds, he might want to make amends. One can only hope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...