Jump to content


caught in Primark and cautioned by Police - now RLP after money - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My girl friend was at Primark, she got caught stealing. Was taken to a room by Security and since she didnt have a photographic evidence with her , police were called who cautioned her, she signed a letter by the police.

 

Primark sent separate details to the RLP and said they will make their recovery from there.

 

Question is:

- What to expect from the RLP?

- How much money should she pay to the RLP.

 

She had apologized and vowed never ever to steal again. this was her first time and she regrets it fully. But now I need to help her out. I have no experience of dealing with RLP before.

 

At Primakr she made a formal apology to the security in the presence of the Police . Is the RLP still going to come after her?

 

The things she took, they were not damaged other then the price tags , I think she took off the tags off one of the products.

 

Is Primark going to take unnecessary action against her if she refuses to deal with RLP?

 

 

 

Also , will she be able to shop at Manchester store?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Answers:

 

- What to expect from the RLP?

 

Lots of letters full of faux legalese. You can either send a simple denial of liability, and then ignore them, or just ignore them from the outset. Do not phone RLP in any circumstances.

 

- How much money should she pay to the RLP?

 

Nothing, zilch, nada, zero, zip.

 

 

She has been dealt with by the police, who are the correct people to deal with thieves. There is no place for any other process such as RLP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Scarlet,

 

Question that comes to mind is that Police cautioned her and she signed some letter.

 

Now I read on this website that RLP will be acting on behalf of their client, Primark. Does that mean that Primark can go back to the police and ask them to come after my girlfriend because she refused to give the amount that RLP charged, or refused to respond to RLP in anyway.

 

Also, what is Primark's role in this while thing? they have banned her from going into any Primark stores plus asked for a verbal apology in the presence of the Police. Girlfriend apologized. Will Primark still continue to haunt her through RLP and Police?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does that mean that Primark can go back to the police and ask them to come after my girlfriend because she refused to give the amount that RLP charged, or refused to respond to RLP in anyway.

 

RLP has no official connection with the criminal justice system. They are just a company that sends out speculative invoices.

 

Also, what is Primark's role in this while thing? they have banned her from going into any Primark stores plus asked for a verbal apology in the presence of the Police. Girlfriend apologized. Will Primark still continue to haunt her through RLP and Police?

 

It sounds as if the police will take no further action. RLP will send lots of aggressive demands and silly letters, but they can be ignored.

 

If you are worried, go and see CAB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks yet again Scarlet. Question now is :

 

- Can Primark take any further action against my GF, for failure to pay any costs?

- I was reading on the CAB website, if one admits and accepts caution given by the police , then one has admitted to their folly.

- Does that mean its now easy for Primark to make a Criminal case in the court?

 

 

I read in another thread that retailer can bring on criminal charges. Does it make a strong court case for them specially when a police caution has been given and theft admitted and apologized for , by the person?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks yet again Scarlet. Question now is :

 

- Can Primark take any further action against my GF, for failure to pay any costs? - no

- I was reading on the CAB website, if one admits and accepts caution given by the police , then one has admitted to their folly. - still does not give RLP any powers to demand anything.

- Does that mean its now easy for Primark to make a Criminal case in the court? - no

 

I read in another thread that retailer can bring on criminal charges.

Does it make a strong court case for them specially when a police caution has been given

and theft admitted and apologized for ,

by the person?

 

if primark have not comented or written

 

i'd very much doubt it

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dx100, sorry I didnt understand when you wrote : Primark have not commented or written?

 

Do you mean they will first write to my GF if they want to prosecute? if they decide to do that after RPL fails to collect any money from us, then wouldnt they get a chance to add in more costs and legal fees?

 

Please can you clarify what you meant by the comment.. many thanks ... really really appreciate all this help and advise ..

Also. is there a set timeframe within which Primark can make a court case if and only if they decide to? I believe they have sufficient CCTV footage against my GF , so just confirming .

 

 

In the current situation, can we safely assume that after being cautioned by the Police, and totally ignoring the RLP or writing to them the simple line that we are not liable for any costs to them or "their client" , The matter came to an end.

 

 

GF told me she scratched the bar code on a few items and took the tag off one of them. though none of the products were damaged and were fully recovered by them. Does the scratching of the barcode and taking off the tag equate to "damaged goods"?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

if primrk wanted to prosecute they would have done it already

 

RLP are NOTHING to do with them

 

they prob dont even know about it.

 

you need to type in primark in our search top right

 

and have a read

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate,if primark dont have anything to do with rpl, then why did they hand over a print out of intent for civil recovery with rpl's logo on the letter?

 

 

Also , please can someone advise me on , whether we should send them a letter with the following text :

 

"Having now had an opportunity to take advice, my position is that any liability to you or any company you claim to represent is denied.

No further correspondence will be entered into with you."

 

Given that Primark does have CCTV footage that they can use against us and GF was cautioned by Police .. will the above letter sent to RPL be applicable to our situation?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Repetetive question, repetetive answer:

 

You can either send a simple denial of liability, and then ignore them, or just ignore them from the outset.

 

RLP may issue shop security staff with forms with either their logo or the retailer's, or both. It doesn't make their demands any more legitimate.

 

Read some of the other threads on this forum- the answers to your questions are there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Having now had an opportunity to take advice, my position is that any liability to you or any company you claim to represent is denied.

No further correspondence will be entered into with you."

 

Given that Primark does have CCTV footage that they can use against us and GF was cautioned by Police .. will the above letter sent to RPL be applicable to our situation?

 

In the Oxford case there was no denial that shoplifting took place just that damages were not recoverable under civil law, the Judge whilst having some sympathy with the retailer, agreed.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much All,

 

Just a quick update , I called the CAB and they said the Caution will be seen on GF's CRB records for at least 5 years. After which time it will be deemed as spent. Its such a heavy price to pay for a first time offender. She's been crying nonstop since yesterday ..

 

Also I asked the CAB, whether Primark can take this matter any further. They said no they will not. They called the Police on the spot and she was Cautioned. That was the end of the matter as far as Primark are concerned.

 

Regards RLP , they said what many friends here said , Ignore them completely and reference was given of the Oxford case.

 

I asked if the Caution can be contested in anyway. They said no, because the offence was admitted to.

 

So now that everything is in perspective GF's worry is around her CRB and the Caution .. Can it hinder her holiday travel to international countries? Obviously looks like she wont be getting it easy way in obtaining a job because most employers do a CRB check anyways and the minute they will find out they will simply refuse her application . Am I right in thinking that she is in quite a trouble now? also what happens after 5 years when the Caution becomes "spent" .. is this going to mark her forever ?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

and now the question of being banned. GF's own family and I , we shop heavily at Primark , now with Christmas approaching GF wont be able to join us for shopping.

Anyone knows how long this ban is enforced for?

 

I called up the HeadOffice of Primark to ask for company procedure and they said only the manager of the concerned store can decide if he wants to ban forever or for a certain timeframe .. they said they dont have a company policy of any sort on that.

 

Would it be wise to call the manager of the store and make a request to reduce the ban from a lifetime to maybe a few months?

 

 

Also, say after 2-3 months if GF does go with me to Primark , will they recognize her? I have read here on the forums that the security guards are the key people who are trained to recognize faces , if supposing they recognize her , will it have serious consequences for her? Primark HO people said they use a security company to hire guards and security services .. if the guards change after a while , will it still be equally risky for GF to visit Primark?

 

She is regretting this whole incident extremely and obviously will behave well in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I have a quick question please. GF was cautioned by Police after being caught shoplifting by Primark.

 

Some people told me Caution is a serious issue specially when one is taken to the Police Station and taken a picture of and finger printed.

 

In her case she was asked to sign a form at the Primark premises and administered a caution. After checking her passport and ID she was asked to leave.

 

She was told she was being cautioned for theft . While she was caught shoplifting. Does the wording of the offence make a difference?

 

What is the difference between both these types of caution procedures? Is she is serious trouble with respect to her CRB checks and employability for the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I have a quick question please. GF was cautioned by Police after being caught shoplifting by Primark.

 

Some people told me Caution is a serious issue specially when one is taken to the Police Station and taken a picture of and finger printed.

 

In her case she was asked to sign a form at the Primark premises and administered a caution. After checking her passport and ID she was asked to leave.

 

She was told she was being cautioned for theft . While she was caught shoplifting. Does the wording of the offence make a difference?

 

What is the difference between both these types of caution procedures? Is she is serious trouble with respect to her CRB checks and employability for the future.

I thought that cautions were only done at a police station, usually by a reasonably senior officer. If your GF was not taken to the police station then this might have just been a warning ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

 

keep to one thread on this please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that cautions were only done at a police station, usually by a reasonably senior officer. If your GF was not taken to the police station then this might have just been a warning ...

 

Sorry Dx, I thought it was a separate topic .. apologies for inconvenience caused.

 

 

Grumpy, GF called police station this morning and asked if they could tell her what exactly she signed , as in , the name of the form .. but Police didnt ask for any details to check up and simply said it was a caution and for any further questions she should contact her solicitor ! Its very strange though. Is there any other authority that she can call and ask what exactly is on her record?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Folks, need your advise.

 

Seriously thinking of giving the store manager a ring and apologize for what happened and request that the ban be reduced.

 

You reckon that would work at all?

 

EErr..Nope

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok , I am in a bit of a struggle here .. so GF hasnt stopped crying and panicking since the Primark issue happened, today I have asked her what is worrying her so much , the issue is more or less over.

 

 

Now i am even more worried about what to do .. already she's got a caution on her record (after being caught at Primark ) , as a result she will be turned down in many jobs in her field. What are the chances of her getting in trouble again? somebody please help and advise me , this is getting to my nerves now.

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

please someone advice me , I am feeling anxious about this whole thing now ..

 

 

Will Citizens Advice Bureau be able to advice on this?

 

I dont know if I should even be asking them about this knowing that she is guilty..

Free solicitors advice?

 

I have trailed over the internet and cant find much info

 

.. Seriously wondering now,

can police convict her for a previous offence,

 

 

anything else I can do to seek advice and read more on the topic?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd stop worrying about all of it

 

nothing is going to happen

 

and i doubt [unless the same staff are on duty]

 

that she'll get any problems in using the store.

 

all they could do is just ask her to leave.

 

i think the police 'perhaps' being involved before is a white herring because of the worrying.

 

forget it all and get on with your lives!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Dx , really really appreciate your advice. I guess its natural to get shaken specially when one has never before fallen in trouble of any kind ..

 

 

We have even been thinking of going to the retailer and returning them the stuff she picked. But then someone mentioned if we do that, we are inviting trouble and dropping axe on our own feet.

 

 

anyways, you are right, we need to calm down. Just out of curiosity, someone shoplifts and then leaves the store without being caught. Can they be checked by Police at a later date?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...