Council going for liability order for payments they are already getting?

[Hacked_Off]

from what i know there are to seperate accounts, one for the arrears (which as far as i am aware are for my previous address) and the other account is for my current ct.

 

At my previous address there was a period of around 6 weeks were i had a temp job but i was only working 15 hours a week so the full ct benefit should of been applied. but there was the odd week were i did overtime so would of been liable. Oh and at the time i had a lot of trouble with the joke centre about the 1 month ct and hb benefit run on. This was stopped because of job centre incompetance. 27 jc phone calls later it was fixed, supposedly.

 

From what i have been told if i do not pay the amounts seperatly and exact amounts there system does not now wer eto place the payments and they automatically come off arrears. It is just not possible for me to pay in this way as i am paid twice a week (two jobs). This has been explained several times.

 

They were granted a liability order on my previous address. They said the amount that i recieved a demand for was not payed. I think the reason for this was because it was for £60 and pennys but because i didnt pay it exact the same problem has occured were the system doesnt know were to place the money. A liability order for pennys does seem unreasonable to me!

 

I have asked on several occasions for all information regarding the previos address and my current. This was also requested by TWO councillors. To date all i have recived is a one page inelligable breakdown.

 

rossendales turned up when i was out "with a view to seize goods" this again was for my previous address. They also left a walking possesion order for me to sign. They say i was informed of ths but i was not. Makes no sense to me that they would send part of the arrears to rottendales but still persue the rest seperatly. There was no court order or warrent supplied nor did i recieve any other information from rottendales nor was i given a chance to pay them before the alledged visits. The paperwork they left say they came round twice and have charged me for two visits. No paper work was posted to me for the alledged first visit. the council refused to take this back and combine with the rest of the arrears until my councillor got on to them. i have an e mail confirming they took it back and have combined my current and arrears to one account.

 

BUT when i rang up the girl on the phone said i should pay £76 a month for my current and £20 off the arrears. So the acounts hav not been combined. I asked for it in writing what i should be paying and when but i am yet to recieve this.

 

when i rang up she said she would have to go through the payments and transfer them to each account ie were it should be. Once she did that she said i still owed £21.57 off my current for the may payments. This was payed exactly the next day. Then two weeks later i recieve a letter telling me i still owe £31.57 off my current (on sat).

 

She said there systwem cannot cope with how i am paying twice a week and if i wantd to continue paying this way i would have to keep ringing once a month to have the payments transfered to were they should be. Which in turn would cost me an extra £5 on my phone to do! Talk about overcomplicating things.

Edited June 6, 2011 by Hacked_Off

[hallowitch]

did you receive a rent rebate for previous address did this stop when you moved

[hallowitch]

They were granted a liability order on my previous address. They said the amount that i received a demand for was not payed. I think the reason for this was because it was for £60 and pennys

 

now that i don't understand as they would add that (or more) to the liability order for there administration and court cost so exactly how much was the outstanding council tax

[Hacked_Off]

oh and i do remeber when i moved into my previous address there was a load of trouble over a hb overpayment for the address previous to that. They had over payed my previous landlord hb because in there own words "there was delay looking into my new claim". They tried to persue this amunt from me even tho not a penny of it went through me, it went straight to my landlord. In the end they admited fault and wrote it off. It would seem when they see my name they think werhey lets make lots of mistakes.

 

There was also another amount they tried to persue off me. This was from when i was 16 and moved in with my ex. They sent me a ct bill years later in both our names and told me as they couldnt find him i was liable for it all. I went to the CAB and they told me as i was 16 i wa snot liable for any of it and they should of known that! I had to go them with a birth cert to prove how old i was, despite them having all of my details anyway. The funny thing is when i wa sin there office handing in my birth certificate my ex was being seen to!! So there excuse of not being able to find him was a duff. Is aid to the girl i saw you know you say you cant find my ex? well there he is, over there!!!!! oh it was a sweet moment. lol

[Hacked_Off]

They were granted a liability order on my previous address. They said the amount that i received a demand for was not payed. I think the reason for this was because it was for £60 and pennys

 

now that i don't understand as they would add that (or more) to the liability order for there administration and court cost so exactly how much was the outstanding council tax

 

A demand was recived for payment of £60 and odds. I cant remeber the exact figure. i paid £60 a fw days later. So as it again wa snot paid exactly what they were demanding that amount went to my arrears account and there system shwed the demand had not been paid so they obtained a liability order and all the costs that go with it.

 

make sense?

[Hacked_Off]

Im going to sort through all my papers in abit so will post everything up

[Hacked_Off]

photo bucket playing up, i give up

Edited June 6, 2011 by Hacked_Off

[Hacked_Off]

grrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Edited June 6, 2011 by Hacked_Off
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

[Hacked_Off]

Well ive blanked the info off that one 4 times and its still showing so i give up.

 

The originl 60 demand i got was for 63.83 and if not paid the 125 would be need to be paid.

 

 

This was the £60 i was refering to. So for the sake of me paying £3.83 short this i what they got a liability order for.

Edited June 6, 2011 by Hacked_Off
for god sake photobucket¬!¬!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Hacked_Off]

meh

Edited June 6, 2011 by Hacked_Off

[Hacked_Off]

argghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh i give up

[knigget]

you need to takethose docs down and sanitize them Hacked off..your home address and all your personal details need to be removed before posting them..

[Hacked_Off]

you need to takethose docs down and sanitize them Hacked off..your home address and all your personal details need to be removed before posting them..

 

i have about 17 times!!! there blanked out on pb but not on here?!?!!?

[Vicki202]

Hacked off when you have been sending letters are they just through first class post ? if so this is why they are not replying they will say they have not received them my advice would be to send all letters via recorded delivery this way you no they are getting them. I no it costs a little more and i to had same with rottendales you here nothing for weeks upon weeks then out of the blue they are in your face if they are to turn up at the door start recording be straight to the point and blunt and they back off and there attitude also changes. I would also advise the formal complaints to council about the company and a separate one about the treatment from the council.

[Hacked_Off]

Dear Ms

 

Thank you for your email to Luciana Berger MP. Luciana has asked me to reply.

 

I understand that you were in contact with Cllr Tim Beaumont regarding this case, and he has kept Luciana fully informed throughout.

 

Luciana intends to contact Liverpool Direct regarding this matter, and will contact you as soon as we recieve a response.

 

Best wishes

 

Matt

[Hacked_Off]

[Hacked_Off]

[Hacked_Off]

[hallowitch]

sorry i didn't get time to help with your letter but it looks like you are on top of things

 

did you send the subject access request

[Hacked_Off]

 

again they say "these payments were due in addition..."

 

I keep on saying to them the offers im making are for the entire balance, which they accept then i get letters like this!!!!

[Hacked_Off]

 

again the total is wrong because its gone off the wrong account. And you can see the first payment of £60 which was for the first letter posted.

[Hacked_Off]

[Hacked_Off]

 

again "in addition" they must think im a millionaire

[Hacked_Off]

[Hacked_Off]