Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New london taxi probs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4209 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

i discovered this forum and just need advice re buying a duff taxi.

 

vehicle is 2 months old,

faulty steering box,

which being a safety issue,

vosa inolved,

vehicle off the road,

and tfl suspended 313 taxi drivers licence plates.

 

My questions are: if a manufacturer goes broke and i have 4yrs of finance left to pay on vehicle,

can i legally back the vehicle, informing the finance company, blackhorse, that the vehicle is not fit for purpose, so cancel aggreement?.

 

this being a last resort!...And can i request a suspension of monthly payments until vehicle is repaired ?.

 

The vehicle is supplied on dealers preferences plan, which means lower payments initially over 4yrs term, with ballon at the end

,trade in for new cab, or walk away.

 

Any advice will be very much appreciated, as i have had to rent replacement cab @ £600 month, to be able to keep working,

 

and this is gonna stretch finances if it carries on,

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi taxi driver.

 

Is this company finance or personal finance?

 

If you are generally happy with the car, your less costliest way forward might be to get a quote from a garage to change the rack and then approach the finance company, it is there vehicle and they are the responsible persons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Conniff,Personal finance,unable to get a replacement box,because the manufacturer has no replacement available!.they are working on a fix,but unable to give a date for this.Can i legally get finance suspended until vehicle is roadworthy again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not certain if this is the best forum, but have moved you here as it's not really about the car, more about the finance.

 

Clicking on your email link will bring you here.

 

Any hope of getting the payments reduced or suspended while the problem is sorted is very slim. This car belongs to the finance company so you should write to them by recorded mail and ask them what there intentions are with regard their not roadworthy car.

The car problem is their problem more than it is yours.

Do you realise that after you have paid at least 50% you can just hand the car back to them (VT). As long as the car is in satisfactory condition, there should be nothing further to pay.

 

They won't be able to use it's present problem as a 'not satisfactory' excuse and ask you for more money as 'they' bought the car in this condition in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Taxidriver,

I work for The London Taxi Company so will need to watch what im saying on this forum but will try to help you as best as I can. With regards to a payment holiday from Blackhorse Finance (BF) until vehicle reworked, I find it extremely unlikely that they would entertain this notion but it cant do any harm to call them and ask for advise on the situation you are now in.

The way I see it is that you have 2 options. The first being that you sit tight, keep paying finance on vehicle, keep renting replacement and once LTC have reworked your vehicle and it is back on the road you can then present them with an expenses claim for re-imbursement. Second option is that you contact BF telling them that the vehicle is not fit for purpose and you wish to hand vehicle back to manufacturer and cancel finance. BF will reject this straight away but it will set the ball rolling as they will then contact LTC to let them know your intentions.

There is a real danger of the company going into administration unless additional finance is secured and since the company has being loss making since 2007 with a diminishing market share, who will put in additional funds?? There are 400+ vehicles now off the road throughout the UK that need reworked as well as several hundred stock vehicles. The rework will not be an easy/quick fix as I think the only way they will be able to fix vehicles is by replacing the steering boxes with a new box from a new supplier.

I think it's fairly obvious that we do not have the money to do this and it looks like a lot of drivers are going to be left with duff cab's that they will have to fork out to repair themselves, lose out on the 3yr/100k mls warranty and have a greatly reduced trade-in value. If you need any more advise then pop a note on forum and will try to get back to you.

Edited by Conniff
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

This all about China again. China does have quality problems with a lot of their products and seeking a cheaper alternative to what has already proved to be satisfactory shouldn't necessisarily start with a Chinese supplier. As with all things, the easiest way to cut cost is to reduce quality something the Chinese are famous for.

 

The fingers are quite rightly being pointed at Geeley who has flown in some high level people though they have consequently tried to down play it.

 

 

Are you all being kept fully up to date by Manganese ? And though the Chinese might indicate differently, they won't be too bothered about this and if they are the governing power, they will either want a bigger stake in Manganese or to take a controling share for financial assistance with a problem that they themselves created.

 

If you haven't already, you should seek urgent meetings with others affected and the Black Cab association.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Manganese Bronze, the maker of London's black cabs, has called in administrators PricewaterhouseCoopers after failing to secure new funding.

The appointment follows the suspension of its shares earlier this month, after a fault with the vehicle's steering box led to over 400 of them being recalled.

Manganese Bronze, which is based in Coventry, had been trying to secure a loan from Chinese shareholder Geely.

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20031436

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And now the Chinese are rubbing hands again, there is another stupid company we have messed up, we buy for £2 and make big profit on sacking all english worker and taking company to china.

 

 

The quality of Chinese goods will always comes back to bight you on the bum.

Edited by MARTIN3030
Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a foregone conclusion.

We see this happening a lot and Geely will now be in a position to cherry pick.

Why would they pump big money in when they know if they wait they will get what they want for a token amount.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ado1975,managed to talk to finance co.early this morning,and they have agreed to suspend payments until cab repaired and back on the road!! :) However,with all the bad news today,still in limbo.Spoke to my accountant,and if it all goes pear shaped,apparently,i can state"manufacturer/finace company joint liability,"for vehicle being unroadworthy,wipe the finace off as a loss,and i ask them to take cab back.I hope it does not come to this situation,for both our sakes.Managed,to hire another cab(tx1),@ £165wk,not an ideal situation,but can now go to work:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There will be a cure for the problem, any decent engineer will be able to fit a different steering system in place of the existing one, it's who pays for it that now matters.

 

This is not strictly true Conniff. A black cab has to be able to steer through a 25 foot circle which is not an easy thing to do. In theory though by retrofitting an earlier version should fix the issuethough it is not exactly clear what the issue is. Something must have changed dramaticaly that this is not possible.

 

I think and know your theory is correct though. You only have to look at the Saab debacle to see what is going on.

 

European manufactuers have to cut costs and along come the Chinese Angels with a bite. They lead everyone up the Garden path and then pull the plug at the last minute and consequently buy the company for a song.

 

Fortunately the yanks have woken up to this over Saab.

 

The issue should not be difficult to fix but it's the money/cashflow that restricts it. If involved with a Chinese co then rule of thumb is keep them at arms length. They are more slippry than a thames eel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...