Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Interview Under Caution for Carers Allowance Claim - Advice Please


John200700
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

This is my first thread and hoping for some advise please.

 

My wife has been receiving carers allowance for our son for about six years now but she started work in January 2011 but we failed to notify the DWP. This is entirely my fault as I am the one who looks after the finances and should have realised we had to notify them.

 

We informed the DWP of the change of circumstances on Wednesday of this week and were given a local number to ring, the person we spoke to is a fraud investigator and advised her that a letter had already been sent this week to invite her to an IUC. We did not receive the letter until yesterday.

 

We know we have made a huge mistake and the overpayment is between £4000-£4500.

 

My wife's really upset and scared as to what might happen, she works in a school and loves her job and we have read that a criminal prosecution is possible, a conviction would result in her losing her job.

 

Can you give any advice in regards to the IUC,

Do we need a solicitor?

Can I attend with her?

What would be the likely outcome?

What should she say or not say?

 

Many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can get a solicitor, but given the fact that you admit the error, it probably is not necessary at this point. Yes you can attend with her, but she will have to answer the questions. What the outcome will be is hard to say, but in my experience, being completely truthful, and very sorry can go a long way. She will obviously have the overpayment. A decision on more than that will take some time. Then there are options of them giving an administrative penalty (30% of the oevrpayment on top) and/or a caution, or going ahead with a prosecution. If they offer an adminitrative penalty or caution, then jump on it - as she admits guilt anyway, this will mean no prosecution.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can get a solicitor, but given the fact that you admit the error, it probably is not necessary at this point. Yes you can attend with her, but she will have to answer the questions. What the outcome will be is hard to say, but in my experience, being completely truthful, and very sorry can go a long way. She will obviously have the overpayment. A decision on more than that will take some time. Then there are options of them giving an administrative penalty (30% of the oevrpayment on top) and/or a caution, or going ahead with a prosecution. If they offer an adminitrative penalty or caution, then jump on it - as she admits guilt anyway, this will mean no prosecution.

 

Thanks for the advice, I think an offer of a penalty or caution would be great, do you think they offer that at the interview? Also I've heard that the DWP normally always prosecute if the overpayment is over £2000, is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that you may be part of the case, I am unsure if the fraud investigator will allow you to sit in the interview with your wife: you might want to phone them and ask.

 

If you are willing to admit that it was your fault, and your wife will corroborate, then I would hazard a guess that ultimately it will be you that they will want to speak to. However, they will want to establish a) the intent (i.e. was this an accident, or did you intend to defraud the state) and b) did your wife collude with you in failing to promptly inform the secretary of state about a change of circumstances. If she has signed her name, then that it why she is being interviewed first. During the interview, they will probably show her the paperwork that she signed, and ask her what she knew about her responsibility to report any changes of circumstances.

 

Thus, if I were the investigator, I would want to know why it took you twenty one months to inform them of a change of circumstances, and what prompted the disclosure last Wednesday. (I should note I am a layperson, but some helpful CFIS/ex-CFIS investigators do post on here, and if they don't reply to this thread, then you should maybe have a look around because they tend to have some very useful things to say.)

 

If you disclosed the change of circumstances unprompted and completely of your own freewill, then this will count in your favour. As for prosecutions over £2000, what happens -- I believe -- is that they have to be forwarded to the prosecutors for consideration, but this does not mean that you will automatically get prosecuted. I know someone who used to work in (or very close to) this field, and they told me that people get very hung up about the £2000 threshold, but what the investigators really look for is intent: people are prosecuted for receiving £0 overpayment, if they were seriously 'at it'. Similarly, people are not prosecuted for bigger overpayments over the £2000 threshold. So it's possible that you will be prosecuted, but not necessarily probable at this early stage.

 

So take one step at a time. You need to be very clear on: why the overpayment occurred; what was the trigger that made you realise you were being overpaid and were not entitled to the money; what your wife knew about the situation and her legal responsibilities; why did it take you so long to realise that you should have informed the state about her new job.

 

Oh, it's just me, but I would probably seek legal advice from a solicitor experienced in social security law. I would email round all the solicitors in your area (using yell) specifically asking if they had any lawyers experienced in this area. Often the offer free half hour consultation, and may well have experience with the prosecutions in your area. They can also enquire as to the evidence held against you, and help you decide whether or not to attend the interview or provide a statement that you read out as opposed to subjecting yourself to interrogation. As Estellyn says, you are holding your hands up and admitting your mistake (I think) but I myself am paranoid and I would want to explore all my options. It can't hurt.

Edited by Stan Lee
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice, I think an offer of a penalty or caution would be great, do you think they offer that at the interview? Also I've heard that the DWP normally always prosecute if the overpayment is over £2000, is that correct?

 

No they don't offer anything at the interview, and its best not to mention it there. You need to be prepared that this whole process can take months and months.

 

I think £2000 is a guide, but there are people with higher overpayments who don't get prosecuted.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, one thing you might want to check: I was under the impression that cautions were no longer being issued:

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/newsroom/press-releases/2012/may-2012/dwp045-12.shtml

 

Thanks, did not know cautions had been taken away.

  • Confused 1

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, did not know cautions had been taken away.

 

From the guidance I've read it's only if all of the offence has taken place since April 2012, so in this case as the work started in Jan 2011 a caution is still possible, but doubtful if the o/p is more than £2000.

 

I also agree with Stan Lee that if the husband attends the IUC & takes the blame the investigator may suspend the interview & ask him to leave as he might have to be invited for a seperate IUC at a later date.

Edited by jabba jones
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your advice.

 

Any prosecution may result in my wife losing her job and therefore hindering any repayment, do you think they would take that into consideration?

 

Hoping to get a call back from a local solicitors who have agreed to help and attend the interview.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My advice and i will be shouted down. Is not to go to the interview.!"!!!!!!. if you do go make sure you take a solicitor who is CLUED UP. You are not breaking the law if you refuse to go but if you do say nothing.

that has been my misatake. in 2010 i recieved a letter asking me to go for an IUC. same as your wife i have a disabled son and work as a TA in a school. Off i went as happy as larry!!. Wow was i mistaken. interview was great, guys really jovial and kind, sympahised with me etc. i admitted to being stupid and not knowing carers allowance was linked to earnings, said how silly i was not to have read letters properly. they laughed and agreed. i discovered how much i owed a stagering £20,000 i was gobbed smacked but have being paid it back. well thats it i thought but no i was wrong i recieved a letter from DWP telling me that they were prosecuting me for "dishonestly failed to give aprompt notification....contary to section111a (1a) .... i wrote numerous letters to every one even to david cameron in the hope someone would see sense but no. so to cut a long story short i am in court tomorrow for benefit fraud. i have no legal representative as i do not qualify for legal aid. my husbands hours at work have been cut do we can just about afford to live, everything is up to the max so i cannot afford a solicitor. my son has been ill all week so i'm going to have to take him,and to top it all i have the period from hell. Some times i wonder if there is a god . Any way here goes for tomorrow my life cant gate any worse. and please dont ask me how i have to bath my Son. disabled facility grants Well thats another matter. Some one pass the GIN BOTTLE. please !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

£20,000,

 

I only a TA and my husband an Engineer. we only earn 30,000 a year between us, dont own our own house. I paying it back at £80.00 a month and this is a struggle. we are so far in debt and not for luxury items either. sam, our disabled son is doubly inconitnent, his feeding tube leakes frequently. my fuel bills are astranomical as i'm always washing. he needs a new matress every 3 months and quilts and sheets and clothes. the list is endless. but i would not be with out him. i dont have a bathroom big enough to bath him in so i sponge bath him every day and at weekends take him to local sports center for a shower. no body told us that DFG for children were not means tested so we never applied till this year when now we have a ramp to get him into the house and application has been made to get a downstairs washroom. Apparently i am entiled to direct payments for help. nobody told me !!!!

 

What really gets to me is that they are really good at taking things off you that you are not allowed BUT DONT TELLL YOU WHAT YOU ARE !!!!!!!!

 

Even though davis cameron had a disabled son, I can guarantee his life was nothing like mine.!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

£20,000,

 

I only a TA and my husband an Engineer. we only earn 30,000 a year between us, dont own our own house. I paying it back at £80.00 a month and this is a struggle. we are so far in debt and not for luxury items either. sam, our disabled son is doubly inconitnent, his feeding tube leakes frequently. my fuel bills are astranomical as i'm always washing. he needs a new matress every 3 months and quilts and sheets and clothes. the list is endless. but i would not be with out him. i dont have a bathroom big enough to bath him in so i sponge bath him every day and at weekends take him to local sports center for a shower. no body told us that DFG for children were not means tested so we never applied till this year when now we have a ramp to get him into the house and application has been made to get a downstairs washroom. Apparently i am entiled to direct payments for help. nobody told me !!!!

 

What really gets to me is that they are really good at taking things off you that you are not allowed BUT DONT TELLL YOU WHAT YOU ARE !!!!!!!!

 

Even though davis cameron had a disabled son, I can guarantee his life was nothing like mine.!!!!!!!!

 

Write down the amount of care your son takes and what you've said here, take it with you tomorrow. I think there are duty solicitors at court?? I'm not at all sure about that though. But if there are hand all your notes over, if you write it down tonight it's all there for tomorrow without you trying to tell them everything in an emotional state tomorrow. Get to court early to prepare. Can you take someone with you for support?

Sadly, they are making examples of benefit fraud cases, pity they are picking out people who generally just got in a mess rather than more of the ones that are deliberately milking the system. I think there is a threshold amount for who they take to court too, no questions asked if you go over that limit then you're in court.

I went to court a couple of weeks ago for a £8250 overpayment, I pleaded guilty, I didn't do it knowingly but yes I could see that I should have given details of student loans and therefore I had received money when I shouldn't have. My circumstances were put forward and I was very lucky to get a 2 year conditional discharge.

Take your son with you, let the magistrates see what you have to deal with every day, they're human and hopefully they will be lenient once you explain how your life is.

Good luck will be thinking of you xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

my fuel bills are astranomical as i'm always washing. he needs a new matress every 3 months and quilts and sheets and clothes. the list is endless

 

I think there are schemes (non-income assessed) if you or your child have a disability and you use a lot of water due to being disabled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Writing this while waiting Hospital transport to take me back to hospital

 

On the way to court yesterday morning i sufferred severee bleeding from the lower area and i mean severe bleding. i was taken immediatedly to A & E put on a drip and given drugs to slow/stop bleeding.

 

Due to my sons condition and i am his prime carer are was alowed to return home late last night under the provision i supervised and did not move.

 

My husband rang the court office and told them i was in A&E. He rang later to find out when it was ajourned to to discover a warrent has been issued for my arrest, apparrelt the message never got to court. So here i am awaiting an ambulance and a possible operation and have a warrent out for my arrest.

 

Should have robbed a bank

Link to post
Share on other sites

Writing this while waiting Hospital transport to take me back to hospital

 

On the way to court yesterday morning i sufferred severee bleeding from the lower area and i mean severe bleding. i was taken immediatedly to A & E put on a drip and given drugs to slow/stop bleeding.

 

Due to my sons condition and i am his prime carer are was alowed to return home late last night under the provision i supervised and did not move.

 

My husband rang the court office and told them i was in A&E. He rang later to find out when it was ajourned to to discover a warrent has been issued for my arrest, apparrelt the message never got to court. So here i am awaiting an ambulance and a possible operation and have a warrent out for my arrest.

 

Should have robbed a bank

 

Oh my word!! You need to make sure you get evidence you were in A and E, I bet the court will insist on it. Hopefully they have stood down the warrant. Take it easy and get yourself better, make sure you get a doctors letter explaining what happened, was this brought on by all the stress? Would be good if the doctor could spell that out in the letter too.

 

I hope you are better soon, thinking of you xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...