Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
    • why do you need adobe...use a pdf online website. all for now...no get reading up and do not miss your defence filing date no matter what. post it up in good time no!!    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4244 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,first post so be gental.

 

ok parked outside my local wilkinson`s the other day to get some paint for a diy job, it was in a "loading only" bay where i normaly park when i`m popping in to pick somthing up quick, been parking there for years with not a problem.

was in the shop for about 10 min`s, when i came out found a ticket on my car for “Parked in a loading place during restricted hours without loading” .

 

the ticket states that the car was observed parked there at 12:10 and the ticket was issued at 12:15.

 

there is a sign stating loading only, but the road markings are suposed to say "loading only" according to this:

http://keycases.parkingandtrafficappeals.gov.uk/docs/LOADADJ.pdf

have been worn away.

 

thay have rejected my informal challenge, and if i appeal i have to pay the full fine if i lose.

 

Qestion is, is it worth appealing?

 

(sorry having trouble uploding pic`s, keeps saying "not a valid image file")

Link to post
Share on other sites

From your Jane Packer link:

 

SPRAKE - V - TESTER

This was a case where a motorist went into a shop, bought six champagne glasses packed into a parcel about a foot each way and returned and put it in his car. There was an exemption in the local order for the loading and unloading of goods. The High Court rejected the argument that anyone putting into his car something bought from a shop was covered by the exemption.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From your Jane Packer link:

 

SPRAKE - V - TESTER

This was a case where a motorist went into a shop, bought six champagne glasses packed into a parcel about a foot each way and returned and put it in his car. There was an exemption in the local order for the loading and unloading of goods. The High Court rejected the argument that anyone putting into his car something bought from a shop was covered by the exemption.

 

thanks michael, but what does "about a foot each way" mean exactly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

got the photos on at last!!

 

looking here:

 

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/parking-ticket-appeals#before

 

under this:

 

No4 There has been a procedural impropriety by the council.

 

In plain English: The council made an administrative error.

 

This applies when councils have failed to include all the required information on their tickets or 'Notice to Owner' letters, which renders the charge invalid. If you've been unfairly fined, this is a useful tactic to ensure your appeal wins.

 

According to the sexily named Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions General Regulations (2007), there's a list of information that must be contained and accurate on a civil Penalty Charge Notice. See the full list (there's a slightly different list for posted tickets).

 

In all cases, a council must respond within 56 days of receiving your formal appeal, otherwise the penalty is unenforceable.

 

 

as it states on the ticket “Parked in a loading place during restricted hours without loading” and there is no sign giving a restricting time ie 10 mins only.

 

anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

more info from above

 

According to The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions General Regulations (2007), the following must be contained on a Penalty Charge Notice written out by a Civil Enforcement Officer:

 

The date it is served.

The name of the enforcement authority.

The registration of the vehicle.

The date and the time the alleged contravention occurred.

Why the ticket has been issued.

The amount of the penalty charge.

That the penalty charge must be paid within 28 days.

That if the penalty charge is paid within 14 days the fine will be reduced.

How to pay the charge.

If the charge is not paid within 28 days, a 'Notice to Owner' form will be sent to the vehicle owner.

That you can appeal within the first 28 days and how you need to make the appeal, including the address (and email and fax if appropriate) that appeals should be sent to.

The grounds under which you can make an appeal.

That if your formal appeal is made on time but is rejected, that you can appeal to an adjudicator.

Edited by wsdot7
hilight
Link to post
Share on other sites

as it states on the ticket “Parked in a loading place during restricted hours without loading” and there is no sign giving a restricting time ie 10 mins only.

 

anyone?

If there are no restriction times on the sign, then the hours of restriction are 24/7, therefore the the PCN states the correct contravention
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any wider pictures that show the whole bay ?

we can see another sign further down, we can not see if the loading bay is terminated before this sign.

The worn markings alone are cause for formal appeal to adjudicator once they have rubber stamped the NTO appeal with the failed stamp.

However we need to see the full bay and its markings, it has to comply to very strict standards and must be terminated from the other restrictions.

As well as WRITE not e-mail to the council to DEMAND ( not request) the traffic regulation order for the bay in question, it is not a freedom of information request, make this clear, it is a request for the TRO in effect on that street, it is a public document and must be provided upon request.

With a bit of luck they wont have one as they are expensive and time consuming to re-new.

Expert on Parking matters, Banned by MSE ! along with other parking experts on orders of the BPA !

here to SAVE you money !

Link to post
Share on other sites

As well as WRITE not e-mail to the council to DEMAND ( not request) the traffic regulation order for the bay in question, it is not a freedom of information request, make this clear, it is a request for the TRO in effect on that street, it is a public document and must be provided upon request.

.

 

AIUI the regulations only require that the TRO be available to view on request by any interested party at their offices

 

Whilst a lot of councils will send/email a copy on request, they are not obliged to do so

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...