Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
    • Well, not quite the trouncing they deserve, and Andy Street suffering - despite distancing himself from the poops and being a good mayor (and despite the rather ridiculous muslim voter labour boycott across regions - did they really want the tories to stay in power?) - But not bad at all The Reformatory goons managed two council seats didn't it - out of over 300 they tried for ..     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northern Rock, Selling and Charges on the property


Gimbal
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm posting this here as i dont know what to do.

In approx 2005 myself and my (soon to be ex) wife re-mortgaged our house with Northern Rock and had the 'Together Loan'

After this there was an additional loan that was taken out and secured on the property.

 

since then, we went our separate ways and due to the financial mess i was left with, I went bankrupt. This included my share of the together loan.

 

I agreed with the 2 lenders that had loans secured on the house that i would stay in the house and carry on making these payments.

 

I have been doing this for several years now (since Jan 2008) and everything has been fine.

 

My wife wasnt contributing to this as it was agreed that she would walk away from the house and as long as i kept up the payments, it was mine, but her name has had to remain on the deeds because Northern Rock refused to remove it.

 

the payments have become too much to afford every month and now myself, new partner and our 22 month old son have arranged to move.

 

we are trying to get into a new build house that will cost us considerably less every month.

I'm desparate to not get into the same financial mess that i was in before.

We have arranged to part exchange the house and they have offered us full market value (2 independent valuations) which would cover both secured loans.

 

Because of the mess that my wife was in, she entered into a debt management plan and because the full payments wernt being made to the unsecured together loan, northern rock placed a charge on the house.

 

They did this without informing me or my trustee (the insolvency service) but it still went through the courts.

 

Now Northern Rock are blocking the sale because there will not be enough money to cover the whole amount (including the together loan) as they say that the charge effectively makes it secured.

 

There will NEVER be an extra £60k in the house to pay this off (60 because the £30k has to come out of my wifes share of the house and not mine)

 

Apparently there is an option to lift the charge and let the sale go ahead but they wont even consider this unless i can prove i'm in 'financial hardship'.

 

They went through a very basic income/expenditure and deemed us able to afford the payments.

 

sale blocked.

 

we gave them more accurate figures.....still the same.

because we have both been bankrupt (me and my new partner) our bank balances will always be in the black at the end of the month as we are not allowed to go overdrawn.

so how can we prove we are in financial trouble?

 

I went through a comprehensive income/expenditure with the nation debt helpline that shows we are living well beyond our means (getting by with help from parents) and I have posted this and emailed it to Northern Rock but still nothing.

 

Is there anything i can do?

 

This is killing me knowing that I am sliding further and further towards where i have fought so hard to get away from.

I've tried reasoning with them, telling them that i'll be repaying all the secured money and my wife will continue to make payents on the rest through her management plan.

 

NR suggested (in so many words) that i could default on my mortgage payments and they might be able to look at things again.

I cant do that as it would affect my (already shakey) credit rating and I'd never be able to get the mortgage for the new house.

 

Please help me.

 

I feel like i've been treated really unfairly and that as my (admittedly complicated) circumstances dont fit in with the procedures that they keep harping on about, I'm being left to slip into financial meltdown.

I was even asked about the amount I had put in the expenditure for prescriptions. "Do i really need them?"

Yes, I bloody do.

 

I just wan this to be resolved and to pay back the money i borrowed and return to living within my means.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...