Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
    • Why the Nordic nation, despite its reputation for social equality, has so many billionaires.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dispatches: Britain on The Sick


doktorjohn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4290 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Re-classified as 'defective' or 'not fit for purpose' ? Perhaps the next initiative will be to terminate a foetus that does not come up to specification unless the parents can guarantee independent financial support and ensure that the abomination is kept locked away so as not to offend the rest of the 'master race'.

 

We can then focus attention on pensioners, after all they have served any useful purpose and are now surplus to requirement, and a financial burden, just queue in an orderly fashion at the local euthanasia centre when you get the official notification.

 

Rest assured it won't happen in the UK, after all, we are a caring compassionate people that look after the vulnerable in our society......Aren't we?

 

 

Sounds far fetched, but just give it time.

 

People are already accepting the cuts without batting an eye.

 

When the time comes for the big one, it won't be that much of a shock.

 

This is just a softening up process. A rehearsal if you like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Lib Dems are also for the chop, they've done their job in supporting the tories with the end of the welfare state, now it comes for the their payback re the Lords, their masters have shafted them.

 

Didn't glegg realise the Tories have allways been the enemy of the Wigs? The Conservatives fought the Liberals long before labour was even thought of.

 

Now the 2 enemies have united to destry the greatest thing this country created.

 

Nick glegg must take most of the blame he sold his party and his country for the chance to be in govenment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lib Dems are also for the chop, they've done their job in supporting the tories with the end of the welfare state, now it comes for the their payback re the Lords, their masters have shafted them.

 

Didn't clegg realise the Tories have always been the enemy of the Wigs? The Conservatives fought the Liberals long before labour was even thought of.

 

Now the 2 enemies have united to destroy the greatest thing this country created.

 

Nick clegg must take most of the blame he sold his party and his country for the chance to be in government.

 

One would hope at the next general election the voter of Sheffield Hallam constituency including Students give will give Nick Clegg and Lib Dems the kicking they deserve.

 

What will that leave us with,Tories and Labour and I dont hold any hope out with that lot too :???:

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I nearly voted for the Lib-Dems; to my mind the Tories have moved further to the right and New Labour had moved to fill the gap for a centre right party. By their policies manifesto etc. (before they dropped all their principals to join this evil administration) the lib-Dems seemed the party of the people. I can't see the labour party looking after the vulnerable either, seems the sick and disabled that aren't ex service have no chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I nearly voted for the Lib-Dems; to my mind the Tories have moved further to the right and New Labour had moved to fill the gap for a centre right party. By their policies manifesto etc. (before they dropped all their principals to join this evil administration) the lib-Dems seemed the party of the people. I can't see the labour party looking after the vulnerable either, seems the sick and disabled that aren't ex service have no chance.

 

It won't matter who is in power, the welfare state will be dismantled.

 

If you look back in recent history all parties have made cuts to the welfare state.

 

The big difference today is, they have a great excuse to make the cuts they really want to.

 

"We have to make cuts to get the economy back on track"

 

They're getting away with murder, and the majority of people are just accepting it.

 

Once its gone it won't come back. People need to wake up and see the big picture, before its too late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"We have to make cuts to get the economy back on track"
How they spend your money http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117387/Budget-2012-Everyone-statement-revealing-tax-goes-welfare.html

 

Take a look at the percentage deduction from pay for unemployment, and then look at the figures for overseas aid, they are identical.

If overseas aid was scrapped tomorrow and the cash used to offset the benefits bill for sickness and disability the costs would come down by 16.3% but no, this government would rather strip the lifeline from our citizens and extend it to the third world.

Edited by osdset

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus merging NI and income tax would remove any "right" to benefits including pensions, but so long as they can reduce the top rate for tax payers to 40% it will all be OK.

 

Looks like the only way for the old, sick and disabled will be prison or institutions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How they spend your money http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117387/Budget-2012-Everyone-statement-revealing-tax-goes-welfare.html

 

Take a look at the percentage deduction from pay for unemployment, and then look at the figures for overseas aid, they are identical.

If overseas aid was scrapped tomorrow and the cash used to offset the benefits bill for sickness and disability the costs would come down by 16.3% but no, this government would rather strip the lifeline from our citizens and extend it to the third world.

 

Good grief - if that is true it is terrible. 30% of all tax receipts go on welfare. I honestly didn't realise that it was that high.

I do agree that that figure has to come down. How I don't know, but it is far too high.

 

As for overseas aid. That must continue. If people here in the UK think that we are having it hard, what about those in other countries that are actually fighting for food?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for overseas aid. That must continue. If people here in the UK think that we are having it hard, what about those in other countries that are actually fighting for food?

 

Not really our problem is it, most of the aid get's siphoned away by corrupt governments anyway, if our economy can't support our own unemployed/sick/disabled, then it sure can't help support anyone Else's. We cannot afford overseas aid it should stop now.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good grief - if that is true it is terrible. 30% of all tax receipts go on welfare. I honestly didn't realise that it was that high...

 

Well, that'll depend what you call welfare. The 2011 public spending was:

 

£119bn Pensions

£121bn Healthcare

£62.2bn Welfare of which 8.4bn was Unemployment.

 

Which makes the Unemployment Benefit section of this example of welfare spending to be just 3% or thereabouts...

 

Here's the link.

Edited by RaeUK
Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought charity started at home...

 

Wrong way around, the cuts start at home, the charity goes abroad. Still, I suppose we could apply for overseas aid....

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus merging NI and income tax would remove any "right" to benefits including pensions, but so long as they can reduce the top rate for tax payers to 40% it will all be OK.

 

Looks like the only way for the old, sick and disabled will be prison or institutions.

 

I have been saying this for years now, but what do you expect?

 

If there is a section of the community that costs more than what they generate in income, is it any wonder that they are being sidelined?

 

If you were to run Great Britain as a company, what would you do with the 'stock' that does not perform at best and at worst, actually costs the company money?

 

That's how the politicians see it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really our problem is it, most of the aid get's siphoned away by corrupt governments anyway, if our economy can't support our own unemployed/sick/disabled, then it sure can't help support anyone Else's. We cannot afford overseas aid it should stop now.

 

And if every other country that provides aid was to think and do the same what would happen? It would be catastrophic!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that'll depend what you call welfare. The 2011 public spending was:

 

£119bn Pensions

£121bn Healthcare

£62.2bn Welfare of which 8.4bn was Unemployment.

 

Which makes the Unemployment Benefit section of this example of welfare spending to be just 3% or thereabouts...

 

Here's the link.

 

Pensions account for £119bn which equates to £11.90 per person who is over 65 years of age (10bn people)??????? Me thinks that figure is wrong!!

http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/key_issues/Key%20Issues%20The%20ageing%20population2007.pdf

 

I wonder where they get their figures from. As for the rest I have doubts that it is as cut and dried as you make out.

Edited by hensteeth
Link to post
Share on other sites

Pensions account for £119bn which equates to £11.90 per person who is over 65 years of age (10bn people)??????? Me thinks that figure is wrong!! ...

 

You are quite right - your figure is wrong! £119bn divided by 10m = £11,900

 

I'm not entirely convinced 10bn would fit on our islands. Standing room only ... :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good grief - if that is true it is terrible. 30% of all tax receipts go on welfare. I honestly didn't realise that it was that high.

I do agree that that figure has to come down. How I don't know, but it is far too high.?

 

I agree with you, and by far the biggest group of scroungers are pensioners, I think if they won't work anymore they should be uthanased. Same with the sick and disabled.

 

Its good to keep unemployment benefit though as that will keep a reserve number of workers to replace the ones that get sick or old and have to be put down.

 

Also housing takes a far bigger slice than it should, much of it being taken by those in work. That should be stopped to, and those workers put in work camps.

Edited by count orlok
Link to post
Share on other sites

And if every other country that provides aid was to think and do the same what would happen? It would be catastrophic!

 

Catastrophic, or to put it another way, survival of the fittest, which is the way the world is evolving anyway.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are quite right - your figure is wrong! £119bn divided by 10m = £11,900

 

I'm not entirely convinced 10bn would fit on our islands. Standing room only ... :-)

 

Ooops my maths are up the creek!! Sorry

 

Yes the figure should be £11900 for every person that is over 65 in this country. That's a lot of money! Well over £200 a week!!!! Which does make a mockery of what people are given to believe that pensioners are poor saying that they only receive the basic pension of £100 a week!

 

It's like giving the pensioners a wage equivalent to someone that works for nearly 40 hours a week before deductions on the NMW!!! Surely that can't be right?

 

If that is true, some pensioners must be on a good screw to get the average up to that figure.

 

Well according to the statistics, there are 10bn of them on the island already!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you, and by far the biggest group of scroungers are pensioners, I think if they won't work anymore they should be uthanased. Same with the sick and disabled.

 

Its good to keep unemployment benefit though as that will keep a reserve number of workers to replace the ones that get sick or old and have to be put down.

 

Also housing takes a far bigger slice than it should, much of it being taken by those in work. That should be stopped to, and those workers put in work camps.

 

They are as I have posted above. Surely the country can't afford to keep paying that out - and it's increasing each year - people and pensions!!

 

You do have a good point though with your views.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you, and by far the biggest group of scroungers are pensioners, I think if they won't work anymore they should be uthanased. Same with the sick and disabled.

 

Its good to keep unemployment benefit though as that will keep a reserve number of workers to replace the ones that get sick or old and have to be put down.

 

Also housing takes a far bigger slice than it should, much of it being taken by those in work. That should be stopped to, and those workers put in work camps.

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What isn't so humorous, is this time next year the world will be a very different place for the sick/disabled, with the introduction of Universal Credit, PIP(which ATOS and Capita will do the assessments for), mandatory revision before appeal, and the withdrawal of legal aid, there will be absolutely no hope of of fair treatment, and no chance of getting redress.

 

Universal Credit is a mine field on it's own, just one example:

Currently a sanction for not attending a WFI without good reason would be the loss of the WRAG component of ESA until re engagement.

 

Under Universal credit for failure to attend a Work Focused Interview, or carry out work related activity the proposed sanction is 100% of the total benefits paid for 1, 2 then 4 weeks.

 

The future is bleak all round I'm afraid.

Edited by osdset

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...