Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Dental fine / costs, please help


katrina123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4346 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi, popped into local NHS dentist to ask if i could get treated / check up and if it would cost me, they said it would

be for free as i was on ESA, so they asked for proof, i took esa proof, they signed me up, then i had some treatment, over 2 visits, at no charge.

 

Few weeks later recieved letter from nhs, routine check unable, so please send proof of esa and fill in questionnaire.

totally forgot about this, was going to go to dentist to sort it out. then i get another letter from nhs, ie pentalty charge notice and fine, totalling a sum of over £300! if dont pay, debt recovery, county court, more charges.

 

So i go to my dentist with my paperwork, they say if im on esa its fine, there should be no costs and thats its between me and the nhs as dentist did not charge me, so i need to proov to them now. So im now so stressed and already got mental health problems and awaiting urgent psychiatrist help and on some strong medication...i dont how to deal with this.

 

I cant afford this cost, i only went to dentist as they said it was free to me.

 

looking at my esa paperwork and nhs letters, i think it might be to do with income based esa or contribution based.

around the same time of dental treatment i was switched from one to another, i believe from contribution to income, but the switch over date was just after dental treatment, but surely the dentist would have checked this? i took some ESA paperwork with me to dentist and they inspected it and gave me the go ahead for free treatment.

 

the dentist has assured me, all esa claiments do not have to pay, twice now.

 

do i need to go to cab?

debt advisor?

 

i dont know how to deal with this. i simply can not afford this Fee, i am in debt and cant even afford rent and food, im overdrawn, and on esa, unfit to work, no savings.

 

can anyone advise please? thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you're on contribution based only, it's not free. It's free on income based. Regardless of whether you receive the full amount of income based for your situation, or a few pounds a week.

 

Sort of true. It is then dependent on income rather than the benefit as you can apply for certain forms that wave or reduce costs.

 

http://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/1125.aspx

 

http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcosts/Pages/Prescriptioncosts.aspx

 

Would you have qualified under the schemes?

 

Now how long ago was this treatment?

 

Plus are you sure that you were on solely Contribution based as you can actually be on both types at the same time.

 

There's also rules on refunds which is why I've asked how long.

 

Sorry I'm tired atm so somebody would need to check up the exact rules and times etc once you figured out the above.

 

I'm going to report this thread to the site team for direction as although you are on benefits this is a mixed one whilst the above is important once that's determined this then becomes a debt issue.

 

They're pretty handy with this sort of thing.

 

There should be no enforcement action like debt collectors because you will be classed as vulnerable.

 

The other thing here is the penalty fine and also have you ever received an actual bill? Look about your paper work and double check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to remember reading an email at work wher they now conduct 100% checks on people who claim free prescriptions and state they are in receipt of income based/related benefits.

If you don't suuply the proof that you are in receipt of the correct rate of benefit then the person may incur a penalty.

Have you tried contacting the department that issued the penalty notice? You may be entitled to request a reconsideration of the decision and provide the relevant proof to show that you were entitled to the free treatment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the problem may be that you were not on income based at the time you had the treatment but were later but I would suggest that the Dentist saw the information you provided so probably shares responsibility as should have understood and read the letter properly and told you that you were not covered....I am not sure if it counts that you sound as if you could have claimed income AND contribution based simultaneously as it does not raise income but gives you the additional benefits and was not subject to time limit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou all.

Cab are helping me, CAB contacted NHS, and it was suggested by NHS that I appeal this charge/fine, by getting a letter to support my case from my GP, stating im not well, with mental health difficulties and so therefore was unable to determine the diff between the diff types of ESA and what dental fees were relevant in my case when dealing with dentist,

 

dentist still seems to think i shouldnt have to pay,

 

so im going to send various esa paperwork /letters to NHS, explain the situation, proove my illnesses/treatments,

along with doctors letter. send it all off to NHS, see if they can reconsider.

 

just wondering, what do i need to tell doctor to write exactly? situations like this, i thikn the wording is important,

just want to make sure my gp writes a suitable letter in my favour. I think this letter will cost me too, GP charges for stuff

like this i believe.

 

no mention of low income scheme or refund avaible to me.

 

 

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...