Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

URGENT! Employment Tribunal Claim POC


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4337 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok so this is what i have so far can somebody let me know if this ok? or if i have missed anything significant?

 

Thanks

 

 

 

 

-------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

Statement of Loss

 

 

 

-------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

1 Basic Award

Calculated as 1 week pay per year of service. Last Monthly pay of £xxx.xx multiplied by 12 months divided by 52 weeks multiplied by 2 weeks.

 

 

£000

2 Loss of Earnings

Calculated actual loss of earnings from the period 11 April 2012 – 5 November 2012. Last monthly Payment of £xxx.xx multiplied by 12 months divided by 365 days multiplied by number of days during period between dismissallink3.gif and tribunal (208 days). Including unpaid notice.

 

 

 

£0,000

3 Diminution of future prospects

 

Calculated as one year’s salary for starting position of 3rd Officer.

Lowest starting salary taken from Prospects.ac.uk – UKs official graduate

careers website. http://www.prospects.ac.uk/merchant_...cer_salary.htm

£00,000

4 Injury to feelings

Failure to discuss or investigate restrictions of illness, and then make judgement on the condition and capability of the claimant without due regard to health or injury to the claimant and his feelings.

 

£0,000

5 Loss of Statutory Rights

Calculated as £300 per year for the period of 2 years to receive full statutory rights.

 

£600

6 Serious failure to follow ACAS code.

15% uplift due to serious failure to comply with ACAS code and guidelines.

 

£0,000

TOTAL

 

£00,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not put the failiure to follow ACAS guidelines uplift at 25% if it is a 'serious' failure to follow?

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they didnt follow it at all? they had one meeting and dismissed with immediate effect. I read somewhere that the tribunal awards between 10 - 25% uplift. so i was just estimating in the middle. The other i didnt know how to assess was injury to feelings is there any definite way of determining a figure, I put down £2000 as a general amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 25% normally for breach of the ACAS code. If I'm being honest I would not include that as the tribunal will make up their own mind on this. It's worth bringing it up in your statement but not you schedule of loss as this should be what you have lost.

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm being honest I would not include that as the tribunal will make up their own mind on this.

 

I really think it should go in. If we glance at a precedent of a schedule of loss from a reliable source, we can see that the ACAS uplift is included in the text of schedule:

 

 

Claimant's schedule of loss -- unfair dismissal

 

IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

CASE NO: [iNSERT CASE NUMBER]

BETWEEN:

[iNSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT]

(Claimant)

and

[iNSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT]

(Respondent)

CLAIMANT'S SCHEDULE OF LOSS

 

1. DETAILS

Net weekly basic pay:

£[insert amount]

Contractual notice period:

[insert number] [weeks] OR [months]

Statutory notice period:

[insert number] weeks]

Claimant's date of birth:

[insert date]

Period of service:

[insert date] to [insert date]

Complete years of continuous service:

[insert number] year(s)

Age at effective date of termination:

[insert number] years

Gross weekly pay:

£[insert amount]

 

2. BASIC AWARD

[RELEVANT MULTIPLIER] X [NUMBER OF COMPLETE YEARS' SERVICE] X £[WEEK'S PAY (subject to statutory maximum)]:

Basic award: £ [insert amount]

 

Less

 

 

Amount received as statutory redundancy pay:

£ [insert amount]

 

Total basic award:

 

£ [insert amount]

 

3. COMPENSATORY AWARD

Loss to date of tribunal hearing

 

 

3.1 Loss of basic salary to date of tribunal ([insert number of weeks from effective date of termination] x £[insert net weekly basic pay]):

£[insert amount]

 

3.2 Loss of statutory rights:

£[300]

 

3.3 Loss of [bonus/commission] to date of tribunal:

£[insert amount]

 

3.4 Loss of pension benefit to date of tribunal [specify details]:

£[insert amount]

 

3.5 Loss of [insert details of other benefits] to date of tribunal:

£[insert amount]

 

3.6 Expenses incurred to date of tribunal: [specify details ]

£[insert amount]

 

3.7 [Loss of long notice period:]

£[insert amount -- no more than two weeks' net pay]

 

Losses to date of tribunal (past loss):

£[insert amount]

 

Less

 

 

3.8 Ex gratia payment:

£[insert amount]

 

3.9 Sums obtained through mitigation to date of tribunal: [set out relevant details of each job that employee has had, eg: two weeks' temporary shop work [insert dates] at £200 net per week: £400, three weeks' part-time work at estate agency [insert dates] at £50 net per week: £150 etc]

£[insert total amount earned by way of mitigation to date of tribunal]

 

Total past loss:

 

£[insert amount]

Future loss

 

 

3.10 Future loss of earnings ([insert period] x £[insert net weekly basic pay]):

£[insert amount]

 

3.11 Future loss of pension: [insert details, ie number of weeks at £x per week]

£[insert amount]

 

3.12 Future loss of [insert details of other benefits]:[insert details, ie number of weeks at £x per week]

£[insert amount]

 

3.13 Future expenses: [insert details]

£[insert amount]

 

Future losses:

£[insert amount]

 

Less

 

 

3.14 Future mitigation: [insert details and net pay of any new job. If work is only temporary, give details, including end date]

£[insert amount/details]

 

Total future loss:

 

£[insert amount]

Total loss and adjustments

 

 

3.15 [uplift in compensatory award due to Respondent's unreasonable failure to comply with Acas Code [insert percentage up to 25]% x [Total past loss] + [Total future loss]]:

Total compensatory award after adjustment for uplift: £[insert amount]

 

3.16 [Add award for failure to provide written statement of particulars of employment (either two or four weeks' pay:]

£[insert amount]

 

Less

 

 

3.17 [Deduction for any enhanced redundancy payment in excess of the basic award:]

£[insert amount]

 

COMPENSATORY AWARD GRAND TOTAL:

 

£[insert amount]

3.18 Grossing up for effect of taxation: [insert details]

 

 

[3.19 Statutory cap:]

[£[insert statutory maximum amount]]

 

Of course the above schedule is merely a standard precedent and thus some of the above heads of claim may not apply; and conversley the OP could have additional heads of claim (not least the discrim element) that are not listed above.

 

And, I think the OP has not applied the uplift in their schedule correctly. I note in the OP's schedule point 3 seems to be a 'future loss', and the precedent suggests the uplift does not apply to this head .......without looking into this more right now, that is how I read the above.....

 

Che

Edited by elche

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...