Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is essentially a shared area where there is some private parking but there is also customer parking for a shop that is labelled as customer parking with a time limit of 30 mins.  A friend of mine also received a similar notice around the same time so I assume they are just trying it.  The photo evidence doesn't really show anything as it is pitch black and shows an entry and exit less than the 30 minutes allowed in the customer parking spaces.  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  WWW.MONEYCLAIM.GOV.UK / Civil National Business Centre If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS) Name of the Claimant :            Claimants Solicitors: BW Legal   Date of issue – 02/5/24   Date for AOS - 20/5/24 (submitted 16/5/24) Date to submit Defence - 3/6/24   What is the claim for – The Claim is for £170.00 due from the Defendant for an unpaid parking charge following a contractual breach which occurred on Sin the private car park/land at The Collective London Nw10 6Ff by the driver of registration mark, The private car park/land was lawfully occupied by the Claimant. The displayed terms and conditions offered the driver a contractual licence, were accepted upon entry by the driver, and subsequently breached. Driver's breach: Non-Permit Holder Despite demands, the parking charge remains unpaid. The Claim also includes £70.00 recovery costs as set out in the terms and conditions and in the ATA AoS Code of Practice. What is the value of the claim? 255.00 Amount Claimed 170.00 court fees 25.00 legal rep fees 50.00 Total Amount 255.00 Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN? No Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform? No   The Collective Parking Claim Form Redacted.pdf
    • From their website. https://www.hp.com/gb-en/shop/faq.aspx?p=terms-and-conditions#consumer-customers 12. Effects of cancellation / withdrawal If you cancel your purchase in the timeframes outlined in section 10 (Your right to change your mind after shipment) above you will receive a full refund including the costs of delivery (where applicable) within 14 days from the date of cancellation, except as set out below. We will provide the refund using the same means of payment as you used for the initial transaction, unless you have expressly agreed otherwise.   Was it a change of mind, or faulty return?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can anyone advise on Muck Hall response please? Thanks!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4380 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Is this correct? I just want rid of them so bad, they have been a huge pain in the ass during my repayment plan

Dear Blossom

Unfortunately Mackenzie Hall will not offer any settlement on your account

 

The interest and the value repayable that Quick Quid charges is clearly stated before the loan is agreed.

We are more than happy to keep you on your current arrangement of £61.33 per month until the balance is paid in full

Your next installment is due by 01/06/2012

Once the account is fully paid your credit file will be updated as Paid in Full

Kind Regards

To whom it may concern,

 

I am writing with regards to a Final Settlement Offer.

 

After making my agreed instalment payment of £62 in June, My offer is that I make no more payments until 31st July 2012. I would then make a final payment on that date of £139 and then ask that my account is closed and the debt is marked as settled in full on my credit file.

 

My calculations are as follows -

 

The original loan was for £400 plus £50 in interest. By July I will have paid £311 from this debt with £139 remaining. The rest (£425) outstanding is purely unlawful interest charges which I have been advised by the Citizens Advice Bureau are unenforceable in any Court Of Law.

 

To clarify, I would ask that you accept my final settlement offer of £139 on or before 31st July 2012, and ensure that it is marked on my credit file as settled in full.

 

Please confirm by return email.

 

Thank you.

 

Blossom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask them why they are going against OFT guidance which states that they have to take your financial situation into account. Ask them why they are intent on putting you into further hardship when if the case ever went before a court, a judge would more than likely lessen the amount you are paying.

 

Also ask why they arent providing you a breakdown of charges on the account.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I CANNOT believe in this economic climate that they think people have £425 to spare on interest charges. £425!!!!! I think I'm flogging a dead horse with this and they are going to stick to their guns, and my blood is boiling. I only had the confidence to email them and challenge the charges thanks to the people on this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, look at it this way. If i loaned you £100 then a few weeks later i said you now owe me £500 because you werent able to pay it on time and needed an extension of 4 weeks. What would you say to me? It's no different to how the PDL's work. They just try to exploit various loopholes in law to try and justify charging a massive amount for a very tiny amount of credit.

 

It's just sad that the proposed amendmant to change the law so the FSA can clamp down hard on PDL's, is looking like it wont be passed next week in parliament. For some reason, a LOT of MP's are refusing to vote for it, and indeed, the Conservative led goverment was paid/donated a LOT of money by the owner of a group of PDL's last election.

 

If MP's had a grip on reality, you would never see these extortionate charges/interest amounts being added to a short term loan, and people like yourself that took out the loan because you needed to make ends meet would easily be able to repay the loan and get on with your life.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if all hope looks lost, its best to keep a dialogue open. You never know what may happen, plus if it ever dos get to court, you can still contest it in front of a judge. If you lose the case for whatever reason, you'll be in no different of a position than you are now, as the judge will still take into account how much you can afford and when, and the PDL/DCA cannot change the amount of frequency as it has been court ordered.

 

Remember, courts etc are neutral and investigate both sides before making a judgement on the issue.

 

Now im not saying it will get to court, as the PDL might buckle and give you what you want, but its better to give you the full details, to alleviate any stress you may have,.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

... My reply ... Have I shot myself in the foot???? Thanks

 

 

Thanks for your reply,

 

I understand that I defaulted on the loan, and I take full responsiblity for paying back what I borrowed plus the interest. £425 in interest charges is extortionate and, as stated before, unenforceable in a court of law. I have been advised by Citizens Advice Bereau that I am within my rights to challenge these charges, and also as I have never received a breakdown of all the charges I may immediately make a complaint to the Office Of Fair Trading and to Alan Stewart or Sam Gardiner of East Ayrshire Trading Standards. I shall also be sending them copies of my bank statements showing the high amount of bank charges accrued from Quick Quid trying to debit my account after having been informed that there was no money in the account for them to take, and asked not to do so. So on top of the high bank charges I was charged for them trying to raid my account (illegally) £425 in interest on the loan is extremely unfair.

 

I would like to re emphasise that I take responsibilty for paying back the amount borrowed, plus interest. And I have kept to the repayment agreement so far on time.

 

I ask again that you accept my previous offer and put an end to the matter.

 

Please respond by return email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I just accept defeat on this ...? Advice gratefully received ...

Dear Blossom

This is the breakdown of your balance as supplied by Quick Quid:

Original Principle Balance: £400.00

Check Amount: £300.00

Late Fees: £36.00

Total: £736.00

You have paid to us: £249.00

Outstanding Balance: £487.00

I have consulted my management in regards to settlements your account.

It seems you may have been misinformed regarding legal proceedings. We use a companies called Colemans Solicitors and Stirling Park when considering any legal action.

In regards to Settlements:

They will only consider settlement offers of 80% and above

This would mean a minimum payment at this point to close the account would be £389.60

Kind regards

Mackenzie Hall

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blossom

 

I am about to undertake the same route as you are going down. I am going to propose exactly the same (the original loan plus the original 1 month interest) and will let you know how I get on. I have asked for a breakdown and will be emailing them with my offer next week. Don't give up. I note they said to you an i quote;

 

The interest and the value repayable that Quick Quid charges is clearly stated before the loan is agreed.

 

and that is what you are proposing to pay them am i right? The interest and value repayable at the time you accepted the loan, you are disputing the disgusting rollover charges etc etc. I have paid wonga £826 on a £926 loan - they say i still owe them over £1200! Payday UK i borrowed £410, have paid them back £580 and they still want £400 from me

 

Suzyem

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...