Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yup, for goodness sake she needs to stop paying right now, DCA's are powerless, as .  Is it showing on their credit file? Best to use Check my file. All of the above advice is excellent, definitely SAR the loan company as soon as possible.
    • Hi all, I am wandering if this is appealable. It has already been through a challenge on the Islington website and the it was rejected. Basically there was a suspended bay sign on a post on Gee st which was obscured by a Pizza van. The suspension was for 3 bays outside 47 Gee st. I parked outside/between 47 & 55 Gee st. I paid via the phone system using a sign a few meters away from my car. When I got back to the car there was a PCN stuck to the windscreen which I had to dry out before I could read it due to rain getting into the plastic sticky holder.  I then appealed using the Islington website which was then rejected the next day. I have attached a pdf of images that I took and also which the parking officer took. There are two spaces in front of the van, one of which had a generator on it the other was a disabled space. I would count those as 3 bays? In the first image circled in red is the parking sign I read. In the 2nd image is the suspension notice obscured by the van. I would have had to stand in the middle of the road to read this, in fact that's where I was standing when I took the photo. I have pasted the appeal and rejection below. Many thanks for looking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is my appeal statement: As you can see from the image attached (image 1) I actually paid £18.50 to park my car in Gee st. I parked the car at what I thought was outside 55 Gee st as seen in image 2 attached. When I read the PCN issued it stated there was a parking suspension. There was no suspension notice on the sign that I used to call the payment service outside number 55 Gee st. I looked for a suspension notice and eventually found one which was obscured by a large van and generator parked outside 47 Gee st. As seen in images 3 and 4 attached. I am guessing the parking suspension was to allow the Van to park and sell Pizza during the Clerkenwell design week. I was not obstructing the use or parking of the van, in fact the van was obstructing the suspension notice which meant I could not read or see it without prior knowledge it was there. I would have had to stand in the road to see it endangering myself as I had to to take images to illustrate the hidden notice. As there was no intention to avoid a parking charge and the fact the sign was not easily visible I would hope this challenge can be accepted. Many thanks.   This is the text from the rejection: Thank you for contacting us about the above Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). The PCN was issued because the vehicle was parked in a suspended bay or space. I note from your correspondence that there was no suspension notice on the sign that you used to call the payment serve outside number 55 Gee Street. I acknowledge your comments, however, your vehicle was parked in a bay which had been suspended. The regulations require the suspension warning to be clearly visible. It is a large bright yellow sign and is erected by the parking bay on the nearest parking plate to the area that is to be suspended. Parking is then not permitted in the bay for any reason or period of time, however brief. The signs relating to this suspension were sited in accordance with the regulations. Upon reviewing the Civil Enforcement Officer's (CEO's) images and notes, I am satisfied that sufficient signage was in place and that it meets statutory requirements. Whilst I note that the signage may have been obstructed by a large van and generator at the time, please note, it is the responsibility of the motorist to locate and check the time plate each time they park. This will ensure that any changes to the status of the bay are noted. I acknowledge that your vehicle possessed a RingGo session at the time, however, this does not authorize parking within a suspended bay. Suspension restrictions are established to facilitate specific activities like filming or construction, therefore, we anticipate the vehicle owner to relocate the vehicle from the suspended area until the specified date and time when the suspension concludes. Leaving a vehicle unattended for any period of time within a suspended bay, effectively renders the vehicle parked in contravention and a Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO) may issue a PCN. Finally, the vehicle was left parked approximately 5 metres away from the closest time plate notice. It is the responsibility of the driver to ensure they park in a suitable parking place and check all signs and road markings prior to leaving their vehicle parked in contravention. It remains the driver's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is parked legally at all times. With that being said, I would have to inform you, your appeal has been rejected at this stage. Please see the below images as taken by the CEO whilst issuing the PCN: You should now choose one of the following options: Pay the penalty charge. We will accept the discounted amount of £65.00 in settlement of this matter, provided it is received by 10 June 2024. After that date, the full penalty charge of £130.00 will be payable. Or Wait for a Notice to Owner (NtO) to be issued to the registered keeper of the vehicle, who is legally responsible for paying the penalty charge. Any further correspondence received prior to the NtO being issued may not be responded to. The NtO gives the recipient the right to make formal representations against the penalty charge. If we reject those representations, there will be the right of appeal to the Environment and Traffic Adjudicator.   Gee st pdf.pdf
    • Nationwide Building Society has launched an 18 month fixed-rate account paying 5.5%.View the full article
    • Well done.   Please let us know how it goes or come back with any questions. HB
    • Incorrect as the debt will have been legally assigned to the DCA and they are therefore now the legal creditor. Read up on debt assignment.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Credit Overpayment


petehend
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Tax Credit Overpayment

Here’s how the story goes.

On the 3rd February 2004 as instructed my wife contacted the Tax Credit Team (TCT) to inform them that she had changed Job and informed them her salary had dropped from +£25K to approx £10K and my own salary remained the same. Simple phone call thanked for update and informed we would here in due course of changes to our Tax Credit and Working Tax Credit.

 

On the 6th February 2004 we received a payment for Tax Credits £5,917, on noticing this payment my wife immediately contacted the Tax Credit Team (TCT) to inform them that we believed that there was an error and that we didn’t believe that we were due this payment. The TCT advisor informed us that due to large drop in my wife’s salary this was the reason for the additional payment. Once again my wife asked them to check and again confirmed it was correct.

 

On the 11th February 2004 we received another payment for £127.12. On noticing this payment within days we once again we contacted the TCT and queried why we were receiving this payment. Once again the TCT advisor informed us that it was due to my wife’s salary changing and we would receive a payment of £127.12 every week. Sam again my wife stated that we didn’t believe we were due this and mentioned again receiving the £5,917 on the 6th February and again informed this was correct.

After seeking advice from other people we worked with over their payment in line with similar joint salaries, everyone agreed that it looked as though we were being paid too much. Near the end of February 2004 we again phoned the TCT and advised them that after reviewing online tax credit wards we believed there to be an error in our award.

 

In March 2004 we received a call from the TCT informing us that “They” had made an error when my wife initially contacted them at the start of Feb 2004 to inform them of the changes in my wife’s salary. They stated that when they input this new information Mr Henderson’s income was not included. This meant that the award was calculated using an income of £10K instead of £30K. They advised that due to this being their fault they would not seek to request the over payment be repaid immediately bit instead would recover it by reducing our payments in the forth coming years.

Being slightly naive to the Code of Practice rules etc and understanding that we had been overpaid we didn’t query this further. In July 2008 after 4 years of receiving no Tax Credit we sent a letter to the TCT asking as to whether the overpayment could be cancelled as we believed that we had not made any mistakes and had carried out our responsibilities as requested in informing the TCT of changes to our circumstances and informing them immediately of the overpayment.

 

We received a letter from the Tax Credit Office on the 20th October 2008. In the letter they confirmed that the overpayment arose on the 3rd February 2004 when we informed them of the changes in my wife’s annual income. They stated that when they updated their records they did not include my salary. This meant that our award was calculated only on my wife’s salary and as such a lump sum was paid in to my wife’s account. The stated “We are sorry about this mistake”.

 

In the letter they stated that they had been unable to find any evidence that my wife had made calls from around the 7th or 8th February 2004 querying the payment. The letter stated that the officer had listened to a call on the 26th February 2004 during which we queried the payment and were advised that payment was not correct and not to spend the money. The letter then stated “This means that I cannot write of the overpayment

As stated previously we had contacted the TCT 3 or 4 occasions from receiving the first large payment informing them that we believed an error had been made and on each occasion were told this was not correct. When the letter we received in 2008 stated that on the 26th February 2004 when we contacted them they told us it was an error and the payment was not correct. We cannot remember the date but we believe it was some time in March 2004 before we were contacted by the TCT to tell us of the error. This is backed us by us receiving six weekly payment s of £127, the first being 11 Feb 2004, taking us through to 17th Feb 2004.

The letter we received from the Tax Credit Office in response to our query in 2008 was factually inaccurate with errors in dates, etc. Once again we were naïve and accepted as Gospel that we had not right of appeal on their decision.

 

It is now 2012 and with changes to the Tax Credits we get a letter stating that we no longer qualify for Tax Credits due to our salaries and therefore they are asking us to settle up the remainder of the overpayment.

Initial Overpayment: £6,726

Paid Back: £3,983

Remainder to Pay: £2,743

 

8 Years on and being more world wisely I have started to investigate a bit further.

 

In reviewing the Citizens Advise Bureau Advice Guide on the subject as to whether an overpayment should be paid back. They state that if the HMRC have met all their responsibilities and I haven’t met mine they will ask for full repayment.

 

The Tax Credit Office’s responsibilities

 

When the Tax Credit Office deals with your tax credits claim, they aim to:

 

  • Give you the correct advice based on the information you give them.

Failed – They informed us we were due larger amount after supplying them information. Admitted they made error in letter from Tax Credit office.

 

  • offer you support - for example, if you want them to explain your award notice to you, they’ll talk you through it in detail

Failed - After phoning during all Feb 2004 informed our award was correct even after us detailing we thought it was an error.

 

  • accurately record and use the information you give them when you make or renew your claim, to work out your tax credits and pay you the correct amount

Failed – as stated above and confirmed in letter received from Tax Credit Office in 2008.

 

  • Send you an award notice including the information you’ve given them about your family and your income - if you tell them that there is a mistake or something missing on your award notice, they’ll put it right and send you a corrected award notice.

Failed - took six weeks to eventually agree they had made a mistake.

 

  • accurately record what you’ve told them about a change in your circumstances, and send you a new award notice within 30 days

Didn’t receive a new reward notice, payment made in to our account 3 Days after informing them of change.

 

 

Your responsibilities

 

When you make or renew your tax credits claim, the Tax Credit Office expects you to:

 

  • give them accurate, complete and up to date information

Have always checked yearly tax credit summary and awards, not applicable in this occasion as between years.

 

  • tell them about any changes in your circumstances throughout the year so they have accurate and up to date information

As soon as my wife changed job informed the TCT Team. Also as soon as overpayment was noticed phoned to inform the TCT and continued to do so until overpayment was recognised.

 

  • Reduce the chance of building up an overpayment by telling them about any changes in your income as soon as possible.

As above

 

  • reporting any errors on your award notice within 30 days

Not applicable as didn’t receive award notice until it was sorted.

 

 

  • Checking your payments match the amount on the award notice and reporting any errors.

Although we didn’t receive an award after informing them of change informed them within days of payment being received in account and continued to contact the TCT until they agreed an error on their behalf had taken place.

 

In reviewing the Citizens Advise Bureau Advice Guide on the subject states that if you have met all your responsibilities but the HMRC haven’t met theirs you won’t be asked to pay back all the overpayment.

 

 

Sorry about going on in so much detail but thought the more information would allow for some advice to be given.

 

Short of it is that we believe that we met all our responsibilities and the Tax Credit Office did not meet their responsibilities and admitted it was their error in a written letter from them in 2008 I therefore believe that we have a case to not pay back all our overpayment.

 

Due you think it is reasonable to ask the Tax Credit office to right of the remainder of the overpayment and if so what is the best way to approach this subject with the Tax Credit Office?

Is it worth while contacting the Citizen Advice Bureau for some specialised advice?

 

Any helps or thoughts on my situation would be greatly appreciated.

 

Regards

Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never known them not to send an amended award letter within days of me notifying them of a change, & they will have records of sending one, even if you didn't receive it. So I would be asking them for a SAR, which will show up that they didn't issue that award.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jadeybags,

 

Firstly thanks for your reply and please accept my apologies if I now ask stupid questions as I am unfamiliar with some of the terminology.

 

I have hyperlinked in to the SAR and the letter template letter appears to relate to a Bank complaint, is the idea I should re-word and send on to the Tax Credit Office?

 

When you say "So I would be asking them for a SARlink3.gif, which will show up that they didn't issue that award", what do mean by "they didn't issue the award?

 

In getting this information how will this help?

 

Kind Regards

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think getting every communication will help any more than having a letter from the Tax Credit Office admitting the mistake was on their part. As mentioned previously in the letter they admit it was us who communicated the change and then communicated to them the error in the payments. Therefore under their own code of practice does this mean that we have a case to have all or some of the overpayment cancelled?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just a quick update. Wrote letter to tax credit office stating all points above and detailing that as I had met all my obligations and they has failed on theirs I didn't believe that I should have to repay any amount. At the end of the long letter I thought let's give it a go and then stated that as the fault was purely theirs that I didn't believe that I should have repaid any amount and therefore the tax credit owed me for the years they did not pay me should be refunded.

 

Three and a Half months later I have received a letter from the Tax Credit team informing me that they agree the fault was purely their own and we will not have to repay and that they agree that they should be paying us for the missed year and will be sending a settlement figure of £3,900.

 

Hopefully my case gives others hope in their dealing with the Tax Credit FxxK up that in most cases has been the fault of the Tax Credit Teams. Keep fighting the Fight

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi can I ask does anyone know - this is sort of similar to what happened to me. hmrc have been overpaying me to the tune of £180 a week. I wrote three times to tell them that my childcare had stopped and that I was no longer eligible and didn't hear anything. Then I assumed that the money must be child tax credit or working tax credit - both of which I was eligible for. I suffer from mental health problems and find it difficult to keep track of my finances so to be honest I didn't realise that I was being overpaid.

 

I know that sounds strange but the money came in very unpredictably - sometimes they would pay too much, sometimes too little, and I never knew how much I was supposed to be getting plus I'm not very organised at checking my statements. I managed not to notice that I was in receipt of child benefit for 9 years but that's another story. I think maybe I have some kind of number dyslexia with bank statements!

 

Anyway, when I did realise I wrote to them and they demanded repayment. I don't have anything like that kind of money (£7k odd). Will I still be made to pay it back? At the moment I am appealing on the basis that it is their incompetence not mine, but they are making me pay it back whilst they consider my appeal. I really can't afford to do that. What is more, they are asking me to go through affordability and asking for details of my new partner's income, which he is refusing to give. This is putting huge strain on our relationship and at this rate he will probably walk out (he already has to pay the higher rate child benefit charge even though it's not his child). The irony of that is that they will have to pay me the full tax credits if he walks out - around £13k per annum last time I checked! At the moment they pay me nothing because I am living with him, even though it's not his child and he doesn't give me money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...