Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak actually nailed it in his boring speech yesterday  Starmers only offering is vote to be depressed  Just about sums up lefties  Humourless and Depresive🤣
    • Ah ok I will see if we receive it in the post tomorrow before I go to work. We want to see theirs so we know what documents they will list ? If their N265 is not received then best to send ours so that we do not miss the claimants deadline as per their draft directions.  What would happen if we did miss the deadline even by 1 day ? The claimant would use it against us in court ?  I scanned and posted in #159 the claimants continuation sheet attached to the N244 where they give a background of the case and reference e-mails etc. After this I will continue to work on the WS which is also causing me anxiety. This will also be used to object to their SJ application. I will advise tomorrow if anything else is received.  
    • Last September our 2019 plate Motorhome went to Brownhills of Newark for its annual habitation check/service. Whilst on there site for the day one of their drivers managed to drive it into a lamp post and put a 2m long scratch down the side of the body. They didn't own up to the damage, but luckily we noticed it before leaving the site, at which point the admitted fault and said they would fix it in house rather than go through the insurance. As they are an authorised Motor home repairer etc we agreed to this and a time frame of 3 weeks was given for the repair, which was booked in for late November. It could not be booked in sooner for the repair as we had a weekends away etc booked with the vehicle until mid November.  3 weeks, and a simple re-spray has now evolved to 18 weeks of them having the vehicle, due to the spray job having to be done 3 times, a window seal not been re-fitted correctly, leading to rain water pouring into the van and the replacement decals been applied wrong twice & having to be re-ordered from Elddis who originally built the camper. We finally got the vehicle back in late April, still minus 1 of the decals.   Back in March we had an email from Brownhills asking what compensation we would accept due to the delays in returning the vehicle to us (They have had it for 18 weeks instead of the initial 3 weeks which was agreed). Once we finally got the vehicle back we told them what we expected (Basically the value that the camper has depreciated by in the extra 15 weeks they have had it and which time we were unable to use it). They are now refusing to honour any compensation and are only offering us a free service for when this is due in September.   Legally where do we stand?  Obviously we are not taking it back to them for a service, given that last time they managed to crash it and its taken so long for them to make such a simple repair. We are considering legal action, but are not really sure under what grounds/legislation we could claim. Any advice would be much appreciated.
    • Usual alarmist tripe from the Guardian exposed🤣     Many of the ‘Climate Experts’ Surveyed by the Guardian in Recent Propaganda Blitz Turn Out to be Emotionally-Unstable Hysterics – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG Last week, the Guardian published a survey of 383 'climate experts' and – shock – many of them turned out to be... The Guardian last week published its survey of ‘climate experts’. The results are a predictable mush of fire-and-brimstone predictions and emotional incontinence. This stunt may have convinced those already aligned to the newspaper’s ideological agenda to redouble their characteristically shrill rhetoric, but encouraging scientists to speculate and emote about the future of the planet looks like an act of political desperation, not scientific communication.
    • Thanks all. Just by way of an update, I've emailed the supplemental WS to both the court and UKPC on Sunday evening.   Had the following autoreply from UKPC, so not sure if anyone would look at it before Thu, is it worth calling them to see if they have received it? Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you for your email. Please be advised that we aim to respond within 28 days. Please note that we cannot accept appeals against parking charges via this inbox and the opportunity to appeal this parking charge has expired. Many Thanks, Litigation Team UK Parking Control Ltd  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scared got letter from retail loss prevention


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI There,

 

I am a single mum and so scared I was out shopping with my daughter in Primark and she was playing up and got a phonecall on my mobile I had a pack of vests and socks which I forgot about had the money for them but because I was not thinking walkked out then security approached me and took my datails I told them this was my first and last time doing this but was not thinking. Now I have recieved a letter saying I have to pay £87.50 which I can not afford to pay now I am worried I will have to go to court so scared .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome.

Please try to calm down and have a read of others in a similar situation.

 

Just as a matter of interest, how long were you held?

Did they take you to a back office? did you have a choice?

 

These 'speculative' invoices have no legal standing (YET-if at all)

 

You will get lots of help but the main thing is. YOU WILL NOT GET A CRIMINAL RECORD

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was not held long just gave my address and date of birth then they gave me the information about RLP then I was escorted out as my daughter was playing up. I am just so scared as have not got the money to pay it as all my benefit money pays for my bills and my daughter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets get this straight. They will send you some letters demanding this that and the other then they will get a debt collector to chase you and they may even try the solicitor letter.

The only person that can force you to pay this invoice is a judge and RLP very rarely do court.

 

As I said, read around this forum and you will see just how seriously we at CAG regard this (NOT being the answer)

 

Do not even offer to pay them. You were not arrested-no crime-simple as

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's more, because the goods were recovered in a saleable condition, the shop did not suffer any loss. The security man was doing the job he was paid to do, so he didn't spend any time away from his normal job.

 

I suspect that the security man saw exactly what had happened and saw you as an easy target for an RLP speculative invoice.

 

Ignore the first letter, but if they continue to write, send them a single line reply to their next letter, literally "I deny any liability to you or your client.". That is best sent second class, but get a certificate of posting (free from the post office) to show that you sent the letter. Don't add anything else to the letter.

 

Don't provide any further information (eg excuses or reasons)

 

Don't talk to them on the phone (I don't think that they do call) - don't go through their "security" process if they do call, just tell them that you will deal with the matter in writing only.

 

In my eyes, as well as dealing with thieves, the security people are there to remind forgetful shoppers who have forgotten to pay or are distracted of what they have done, not to treat them like this. They need re-educating. The way that shops are laid out encourages you to wonder around looking for your remaining purchases and it is all too easy to forget that you have picked up some items that you are considering purchasing and then get distracted and leave the store. When I did that, fortunately I wasn't stopped and just returned the items (I had decided not to buy them) to the shelves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chrissy

 

Write a Formal Letter of Complaint, explain what happened, that you are totally innocent (you got distracted by the phone call and you had monies to pay for the goods on you) and this is a case of an over zealous security guard.

As the guys have said, try not to worry.

 

Send it to:-

 

Paul Marchant, Chief Executive

[email protected]

 

Some tips:- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1242161/How--write-letter-complaint.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Chrissy

 

Dx100 – Instructions on uploading pdfs

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having sent letter stating deny no liability now I have a letter stating that they have considered all the issues raised and have attatched a Defence to civil claim form. and that if I reject all the alternatives that their client will be entititled to issue a Claim in the county court. Worried now . I can not afford to pay £87.50 and the goods were returned straight away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Don't worry about this new letter. You have written stating your case so in my opinion, you should now ignore their letters.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far, RLP has invited you to make a contribution to their funds ()maybe their Christmas party and you have declined. They can't issued any claim through the courts and their clients haven't either.

 

At the moment there is nothing to provide a defense to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

I have received another letter today titled " Claiments Offer to Settle Claim Pursuant to Part 36 Civil Procedure Rules 1998 " Says the claiment is willing to make a offer of £70 .00 in full but I still can not afford this . Do I still ignore the letters worried again that they will take me to court when it was a mistake as stated in my thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Your client is fully aware of my version of events, the CCTV backs this up. I am currently considering making a claim against your client and I am happy to include RLP if you continue to represent them. At the moment I am willing to accept an offer of £200 from your client" ... just a thought

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, since you've told them you deny any liability, I'd continue to ignore RLP. They send these letters quoting legal procedures to try to intimidate you into believing that they have some sort of legal authority; they have not. If they want to waste stamps, let them.

 

I agree. If you had formally admitted theft to Police/Court, then they might sometimes have a basis to recover some damages. But you did not admit a theft, you did not commit a theft and you have not been convicted of a theft. So they would find it virtually impossible to win a civil claim against you. This is just speculative bullying by computer-generated form letter, ignore it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...